Endockscope: using mobile technology to create global point of service endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent advances and the widespread availability of smartphones have ushered in a new wave of innovations in healthcare. We present our initial experience with Endockscope, a new docking system that optimizes the coupling of the iPhone 4S with modern endoscopes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the United States Air Force resolution target, we compared the image resolution (line pairs/mm) of a flexible cystoscope coupled to the Endockscope+iPhone to the Storz high definition (HD) camera (H3-Z Versatile). We then used the Munsell ColorChecker chart to compare the color resolution with a 0° laparoscope. Furthermore, 12 expert endoscopists blindly compared and evaluated images from a porcine model using a cystoscope and ureteroscope for both systems. Finally, we also compared the cost (average of two company listed prices) and weight (lb) of the two systems. RESULTS: Overall, the image resolution allowed by the Endockscope was identical to the traditional HD camera (4.49 vs 4.49 lp/mm). Red (ΔE=9.26 vs 9.69) demonstrated better color resolution for iPhone, but green (ΔE=7.76 vs 10.95), and blue (ΔE=12.35 vs 14.66) revealed better color resolution with the Storz HD camera. Expert reviews of cystoscopic images acquired with the HD camera were superior in image, color, and overall quality (P=0.002, 0.042, and 0.003). In contrast, the ureteroscopic reviews yielded no statistical difference in image, color, and overall (P=1, 0.203, and 0.120) quality. The overall cost of the Endockscope+iPhone was $154 compared with $46,623 for a standard HD system. The weight of the mobile-coupled system was 0.47 lb and 1.01 lb for the Storz HD camera. CONCLUSION: Endockscope demonstrated feasibility of coupling endoscopes to a smartphone. The lighter and inexpensive Endockscope acquired images of the same resolution and acceptable color resolution. When evaluated by expert endoscopists, the quality of the images overall were equivalent for flexible ureteroscopy and somewhat inferior, but still acceptable for flexible cystoscopy.

Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator--role as an assessment tool?

PURPOSE: Virtual reality simulators are often used for surgical skill training since they facilitate deliberate practice in a controlled, low stakes environment. However, to be considered for assessment purposes rigorous construct and criterion validity must be demonstrated. We performed face, content, construct and concurrent validity testing of the dV-Trainer™ robotic surgical simulator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urology residents, fellows and attending surgeons were enrolled in this institutional review board approved study. After a brief introduction to the dV-Trainer each subject completed 3 repetitions each of 4 virtual reality tasks on it, including pegboard ring transfer, matchboard object transfer, needle threading of rings, and the ring and rail task. One week later subjects completed 4 similar tasks using the da Vinci® robot. Subjects were assessed on total task time and total errors using the built-in scoring algorithm and manual scoring for the dV-Trainer and the da Vinci robot, respectively. RESULTS: Seven experienced and 13 novice robotic surgeons were included in the study. Experienced surgeons were defined by greater than 50 hours of clinical robotic console time. Of novice robotic surgeons 77% ranked the dV-Trainer as a realistic training platform and 71% of experienced robotic surgeons ranked it as useful for resident training. Experienced robotic surgeons outperformed novices in many dV-Trainer and da Vinci robot exercises, particularly in the number of errors. On pooled data analysis dV-Trainer total task time and total errors correlated with da Vinci robot total task time and total errors (p = 0.026 and 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the face, content, construct and concurrent validity of the dV-Trainer, which may have a potential role as an assessment tool.

Are multiple cryoprobes additive or synergistic in renal cryotherapy?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between multiple cryoprobes was investigated to determine whether they work in an additive or synergistic fashion in an in vivo animal model because 1.47 mm (17-gauge) cryoprobes have been introduced to the armamentarium for renal cryotherapy. METHODS: Laparoscopic-guided percutaneous cryoablation was performed in both renal poles of 3 pigs using 3 IceRod cryoprobes. These 12 cryolesions were compared with 12 cryolesions using a single IceRod cryoprobe. Each cycle consisted of two 10-minute freeze cycles separated by a 5-minute thaw. The iceball volume was measured using intraoperative ultrasonography. The kidneys were harvested, and cryolesion surface area was calculated. The lesions were fixed and excised to obtain a volume measurement. Statistical analysis was used to compare the single probe results multiplied by 3 to the multiple probe group for iceball volume, cryolesion surface area, and cryolesion volume. RESULTS: The iceball volume for the first freeze cycle for the single cryoprobe multiplied by 3 was 8.55 cm3 compared with 9.79 cm3 for the multiple cryoprobe group (P=.44) and 10.01 cm3 versus 16.58 cm3 for the second freeze (P=.03). The cryolesion volume for the single cryoprobe multiplied by 3 was 11.29 cm3 versus 14.75 cm3 for the multiple cyroprobe group (P=.06). The gross cryolesion surface area for the single cryoprobe multiplied by 3 was 13.14 cm2 versus 13.89 cm2 for the multiple probe group (P=.52). CONCLUSION: The cryolesion created by 3 simultaneously activated 1.47-mm probes appears to be larger than that of an additive effect. The lesions were significantly larger as measured by ultrasonography and nearly so (P=.06) as measured by the gross cryolesion volume.

Ice burn: protecting the flank during renal cryotherapy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Cryoablation is a viable minimally invasive strategy for the treatment of small renal masses. One of the most common postoperative complaints is pain or paresthesia at the cryoprobe insertion site. The use of a 14-gauge angiocatheter to insulate the flank during renal cryotherapy was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six Yorkshire swine underwent laparoscopy-guided percutaneous cryoablation of the upper and lower poles of both kidneys with a 1.47 mm (17 gauge) cryoneedle. Treatment consisted of a double 10-minute freeze separated by a 5-minute active thaw. Trials were randomized to placement of the cryoneedle directly through the flank or through a 14-gauge angiocatheter as an insulating sheath. Temperatures were recorded adjacent to the cryoneedle at two depths in the flank with a Multi-Point Thermal Sensor. RESULTS: Twelve trials were completed each with a bare and sheathed cryoneedle. The coldest temperature observed was -26 degrees C for the bare cryoneedle and -21 degrees C for the sheathed cryoneedle. At the outer sensor, there was a 4.1 degrees C increase in mean temperature for freeze 1, and 6.2 degrees C increase in mean temperature for freeze 2 with sheath use. At the inner sensor, there was a 3.0 degrees C increase in mean temperature for freeze 1, and 9.4 degrees C increase in mean temperature for freeze 2 with sheath use. There was a trend toward statistical significance of sheath insulation at the outer (p = 0.07) and inner (p = 0.08) temperature sensors. CONCLUSIONS: A 14-gauge angiocatheter may provide some insulation and thereby might help protect against "ice burn" during renal cryotherapy.

In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo isotherms for renal cryotherapy.

PURPOSE: Preoperative planning for renal cryotherapy is based on isotherms established in gel. We replicated gel isotherms and correlated them with ex vivo and in vivo isotherms in a porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PERC-17 CryoProbes (1.7 mm) and IceRods (1.47 mm) underwent trials in gel, ex vivo and in vivo porcine kidneys. Temperatures were recorded at 13 predetermined locations with multipoint thermal sensors. RESULTS: At the cryoprobe temperatures were not significantly different along the probe in any medium for either system (p = 0.0947 to 0.9609). However, away from the probe ex vivo and in vivo trials showed warmer temperatures toward the cryoprobe tip for each system (p = 0.0003 to 0.2141). Mean +/- SE temperature 5 mm distal to the cryoprobe tip in vivo was 19.2C +/- 16.1C for CryoProbes and 27.3C +/- 11.2C for IceRods. Temperatures were consistently colder with CryoProbes than with IceRods in gel (p <0.00005), ex vivo (p <0.00005) and in vivo (p = 0.0014). At almost all sites temperatures were significantly colder in gel and in ex vivo kidney than in in vivo kidney for CryoProbes (p = 0.0107 and 0.0008, respectively) and for IceRods (each p <0.00005). CONCLUSIONS: Gel and ex vivo isotherms do not predict the in vivo pattern of freezing. Thus, they should not be used for preoperative planning. The cryoprobe should be passed 5 mm beyond the tumor border to achieve suitably cold temperatures. Multipoint thermal sensor probes are recommended to record actual temperature during renal cryotherapy.

Impact of pneumoperitoneum on renal cryotherapy.

PURPOSE: Pneumoperitoneum is known to decrease blood flow to the kidney during laparoscopy. We investigated if this change in blood flow would increase the size of the cryolesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve Yorkshire swine underwent laparoscopy-guided percutaneous cryoablation of the upper and lower pole of each kidney at four randomized pneumoperitoneum pressures (10, 15, 20, and 25 mm Hg). Cryolesions were made with a 1.47-mm IceRod (Galil Medical, Plymouth Meeting, PA). Each site underwent two 10-minute freeze cycles separated by a 5-minute active thaw with pressurized helium gas. At the conclusion of each freeze cycle, the iceball volume was measured with intraoperative ultrasound. After completion of the four cryolesions, the kidneys were harvested, and the cryolesion surface area was calculated. The lesions were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and then excised with a 1-mm margin to obtain a volume measurement using fluid displacement. RESULTS: Iceball volume was 3.41, 2.85, 3.44, and 2.36 cm(3) for freeze cycle 1 (p = 0.16) and 3.67, 3.34, 4.88, 3.95 cm(3) for freeze cycle 2 (p = 0.20) at 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm Hg, respectively. Cryolesion volume by fluid displacement was 4.06, 3.77, 3.97, and 3.93 cm(3) (p = 0.86) and cryolesion surface area was 4.55, 4.38, 4.39, and 4.20 cm(2) (p = 0.71) at 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm Hg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, pneumoperitoneum pressure between 10 and 25 mm Hg did not affect iceball size as measured by intraoperative ultrasound, cryolesion volume by fluid displacement, or cryolesion surface.