Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Water Res X ; 1: 100013, 2018 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31193912

ABSTRACT

Current groundwater treatment facilities, mostly relying on aeration-filtration configurations, aim at the removal of iron (Fe), ammonia (NH4 +) and manganese (Mn). However, recently water companies expressed the ambition to also reduce arsenic (As) concentrations in these rapid sand filters. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the Fe oxidation state entering a biological filter bed on As removal. By varying supernatant water level, either Fe(II) or Fe(III) in the form of hydrous ferric oxides (HFO) could be stimulated to enter the filter bed at alkaline groundwater pH (7.6). The experimental pilot column filters showed that once the As(III) oxidation stabilised in the top layer of the filter sand, As removal reached its maximum (±75% at 120 cm supernatant level and 1.5 m/h filtration velocity). The increase in supernatant level from 5 to 120 cm resulted in additional HFO production prior to rapid filtration (1.5, 5 and 10 m/h), i.e. homogeneous Fe(II) oxidation and flocculation, and subsequently, HFO ending up deeper into the filter bed (120 cm filter depth). At a low supernatant water level of 5 cm, Fe(II) oxidised heterogeneously and was removed within the top 20 cm of the filter bed. Consequently, filters with high supernatant levels removed As to lower levels (by 20%) than in filters with low supernatant water levels. The benefits of Fe(II) oxidation prior to filtration for As removal was confirmed by comparing Fe(III) to Fe(II) additions in the supernatant water or in the filter bed. Overall it is concluded that in biological groundwater filters, the combination of a higher supernatant level and/or Fe(III) addition with biological As(III) oxidation in the top of the filter bed promotes As removal.

2.
Water Res ; 37(16): 3867-74, 2003 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12909104

ABSTRACT

In order to achieve stable groundwater levels, an equilibrium between the use of groundwater for drinking water production and natural or artificial groundwater recharge by infiltration is needed. Local governments usually require that the composition of the water used for artificial recharge is similar to the surface water that is naturally present in the specific recharge area. In this paper, electrodialysis (ED) and nanofiltration were evaluated as possible treatment technologies for surface water from a canal in Flanders, the North of Belgium, in view of infiltration at critical places on heathlands. Both methods were evaluated on the basis of a comparison between the water composition after treatment and the composition of local surface waters. The treatment generally consists of a tuning of pH and the removal of contaminants originating from industrial and agricultural activity, e.g., nitrates and pesticides. Further evaluation of the influence of the composition of the water on the characteristics of the artificial recharge, however, was not envisaged. In a case study of water from the canal Schoten-Dessel, satisfactory concentration reductions of Cl(-), SO(4)(2-), NO(3)(-), HCO(3)(-), Na(+), Mg(2+), K(+) and Ca(2+) were obtained by ultrafiltration pretreatment followed by ED. Nanofiltration with UTC-20, N30F, Desal 51 HL, UTC-60 and Desal 5 DL membranes resulted in an insufficient removal level, especially for the monovalent ions.


Subject(s)
Waste Disposal, Fluid/methods , Water Purification/methods , Electrochemistry , Filtration , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Soil , Water Movements , Water Pollutants/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...