Subject(s)
Celiac Disease/diagnosis , GTP-Binding Proteins/immunology , Gliadin/immunology , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Transglutaminases/immunology , Adult , Celiac Disease/genetics , Celiac Disease/immunology , Cohort Studies , HLA-DQ Antigens/genetics , Humans , Prospective Studies , Protein Glutamine gamma Glutamyltransferase 2 , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this exploratory trial was to establish if the probiotic Bifidobacterium natren life start (NLS) strain strain may affect the clinical course and pathophysiological features of patients with untreated celiac disease (CD). Positive findings would be helpful in directing future studies. METHODS: Twenty-two adult patients having 2 positives CD-specific tests were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive 2 capsules before meals for 3 weeks of either Bifidobacterium infantis natren life start strain super strain (Lifestart 2) (2×10(9) colony-forming units per capsule) (n = 12) or placebo (n = 10), whereas they also consumed at least 12 g of gluten/day. A biopsy at the end of the trial confirmed CD in all cases. The primary outcome was intestinal permeability changes. Secondary endpoints were changes in symptoms and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, and in immunologic indicators of inflammation. RESULTS: The abnormal baseline intestinal permeability was not significantly affected by either treatment. In contrast to patients on placebo, those randomized to B. infantis experienced a significant improvement in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (P = 0.0035 for indigestion; P = 0.0483 for constipation; P = 0.0586 for reflux). Final/baseline IgA tTG and IgA DGP antibody concentration ratios were lower in the B. infantis arm (P = 0.055 for IgA tTG and P = 0.181 for IgA DGP). Final serum macrophage inflammatory protein-1ß increased significantly (P < 0.04) only in patients receiving B. infantis. The administration of B. infantis was safe. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that B. infantis may alleviate symptoms in untreated CD. The probiotic produced some immunologic changes but did not modify abnormal intestinal permeability. Further studies are necessary to confirm and/or expand these observations.
Subject(s)
Bifidobacterium/growth & development , Celiac Disease/therapy , Intestines/microbiology , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Argentina , Autoantibodies/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Biopsy , Celiac Disease/blood , Celiac Disease/complications , Celiac Disease/diagnosis , Celiac Disease/immunology , Celiac Disease/microbiology , Cells, Cultured , Chemokine CCL4/blood , Combined Modality Therapy , Diet, Gluten-Free , Double-Blind Method , Female , GTP-Binding Proteins , Gliadin/immunology , Humans , Intestinal Absorption , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Intestines/immunology , Intestines/pathology , Lactulose/urine , Male , Mannitol/urine , Middle Aged , Peptide Fragments/immunology , Permeability , Protein Glutamine gamma Glutamyltransferase 2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Transglutaminases/immunology , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCCION: Aunque la enfermedad celíaca (EC) se asocia comúnmente a diarrea crónica, 10% de los casos pueden presentarse con constipación crónica (CC). No hay estudios que exploren la prevalencia de EC o marcadores potenciales de la sensibilidad al gluten (SG) en pacientes que consultan por CC.OBJETIVO: Determinar la prevalencia de marcadores potenciales de SG y EC en pacientes con CC que consultan a un centro terciario de referencia.METODOS: Estudio exploratorio prospectivo. Se evaluó a 121 pacientes adultos consecutivos con diagnóstico de CC funcional (67,8%) o SII-C (criterios de Roma III) con anticuerpos contra péptidos deamidados de gliadina IgA e IgG y anti-transglutaminasa tisular (DGP/tTGscreen valor corte=20). Los casos seropositivos fueron analizados con IgA tTG y todos los DGP/tTG Screen casos positivos se sometieron a biopsias endoscópicas de duodeno. La prevalencia se comparó con la de 518 sujetos (endoscopía digestiva alta por síntomas no relacionados primariamente con EC) y con la estimada para la población urbana del Gran La Plata. Se consideró diagnóstico de EC a la presencia de una enteropatía Marsh Illa o mayor en los casos seropositivos. Se consideró SG a los casos seropositivos sin enteropatía ni autoanticuerpos (IgA tTG).RESULTADOS: 10 pacientes (8,3%) y 46 sujetos del grupo control (8,9%) con CC tuvieron resultados positivos DGP/tTG Screen. 3 pacientes seropositivos con CC y 14 controles presentaron biopsia compatible con EC. Se estimó una prevalencia de 2,5% para los pacientes con CC y 2,7% para los controles. La prueba de IgA tTG fue positiva en 5 de los 10 pacientes con CC (incluidos los 2 casos diagnosticados con EC) y en 13 controles (100% y 92% de sensibilidad, respectivamente), 5 pacientes con CC fueron considerados como SG.CONCLUSIONES: Este estudio fue el primero en determinar la prevalencia en EC y SG en pacientes con CC, la cual resultó casi cuatro veces mayor que la estimada para la población general de Argentina (1/133).
INTRODUCTION: Celiac disease (CD) diagnosis is strongly associated with the presence of chronic diarrhea, but up to 10% of newly diagnosed cases may complain of chronic constipation (CC). No studies have explored the prevalence of CD or potential markers of gluten sensitivity among patients consulting for CC.OBJECTIVE: TO determine the prevalence of potential markers of gluten sensitivity and CD in a series of consecutive patients with chronic constipation attending a tertiary referral center.METHODS: An exploratory study was conducted at Gastroenterology Hospital of Buenos Aires. 121 adult consecutive patients with diagnosis of chronic constipation (67.8%) or IBS-C (Rome III criteria) were assessed for antibodies to deamidatedgliadin peptides IgA and IgG and tissue transglutaminase (DGP/tTG Screen cut-off: 20 U/mL). Seropositive cases were tested (IgA tTG) and all DGP/tTG Screen positive cases underwent duodenal biopsies. Prevalece was compared with that obtained from a control population of 518 subjects (upper endoscopy due to symptoms not primarily related to CD). Type Illa Marshs enteropathy or greater in seropositive cases was considered as CD diagnosis.RESULTS: 10 patients (8.3%) and 46 controls (8.9%) with CC had a positive DGP/tTGScreen test. 3 seropositive patients with CC and 14 controls had a CD compatible biopsy. The IgA tTG test was positive in 5 of the 10 patients with CC (including those 3 cases finally diagnosed with CD) and in 13 from control population (100% and 92% sensitivity, respectively). 5 patients with CC were considered as gluten sensitive (serology positive, but no enteropathy).CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to determine a higher prevalence of CD and gluten sensitivity in patients complaining of CC. This prevalence was almost four times greater than that estimated for the general Argentinean population (1/133).
Subject(s)
Celiac Disease , Constipation , Glutens/adverse effects , Argentina , Public HealthABSTRACT
INTRODUCCION: Aunque la enfermedad celíaca (EC) se asocia comúnmente a diarrea crónica, 10% de los casos pueden presentarse con constipación crónica (CC). No hay estudios que exploren la prevalencia de EC o marcadores potenciales de la sensibilidad al gluten (SG) en pacientes que consultan por CC.OBJETIVO: Determinar la prevalencia de marcadores potenciales de SG y EC en pacientes con CC que consultan a un centro terciario de referencia.METODOS: Estudio exploratorio prospectivo. Se evaluó a 121 pacientes adultos consecutivos con diagnóstico de CC funcional (67,8%) o SII-C (criterios de Roma III) con anticuerpos contra péptidos deamidados de gliadina IgA e IgG y anti-transglutaminasa tisular (DGP/tTGscreen valor corte=20). Los casos seropositivos fueron analizados con IgA tTG y todos los DGP/tTG Screen casos positivos se sometieron a biopsias endoscópicas de duodeno. La prevalencia se comparó con la de 518 sujetos (endoscopía digestiva alta por síntomas no relacionados primariamente con EC) y con la estimada para la población urbana del Gran La Plata. Se consideró diagnóstico de EC a la presencia de una enteropatía Marsh Illa o mayor en los casos seropositivos. Se consideró SG a los casos seropositivos sin enteropatía ni autoanticuerpos (IgA tTG).RESULTADOS: 10 pacientes (8,3%) y 46 sujetos del grupo control (8,9%) con CC tuvieron resultados positivos DGP/tTG Screen. 3 pacientes seropositivos con CC y 14 controles presentaron biopsia compatible con EC. Se estimó una prevalencia de 2,5% para los pacientes con CC y 2,7% para los controles. La prueba de IgA tTG fue positiva en 5 de los 10 pacientes con CC (incluidos los 2 casos diagnosticados con EC) y en 13 controles (100% y 92% de sensibilidad, respectivamente), 5 pacientes con CC fueron considerados como SG.CONCLUSIONES: Este estudio fue el primero en determinar la prevalencia en EC y SG en pacientes con CC, la cual resultó casi cuatro veces mayor que la estimada para la población general de Argentina (1/133).
INTRODUCTION: Celiac disease (CD) diagnosis is strongly associated with the presence of chronic diarrhea, but up to 10% of newly diagnosed cases may complain of chronic constipation (CC). No studies have explored the prevalence of CD or potential markers of gluten sensitivity among patients consulting for CC.OBJECTIVE: TO determine the prevalence of potential markers of gluten sensitivity and CD in a series of consecutive patients with chronic constipation attending a tertiary referral center.METHODS: An exploratory study was conducted at Gastroenterology Hospital of Buenos Aires. 121 adult consecutive patients with diagnosis of chronic constipation (67.8%) or IBS-C (Rome III criteria) were assessed for antibodies to deamidatedgliadin peptides IgA and IgG and tissue transglutaminase (DGP/tTG Screen cut-off: 20 U/mL). Seropositive cases were tested (IgA tTG) and all DGP/tTG Screen positive cases underwent duodenal biopsies. Prevalece was compared with that obtained from a control population of 518 subjects (upper endoscopy due to symptoms not primarily related to CD). Type Illa Marshs enteropathy or greater in seropositive cases was considered as CD diagnosis.RESULTS: 10 patients (8.3%) and 46 controls (8.9%) with CC had a positive DGP/tTGScreen test. 3 seropositive patients with CC and 14 controls had a CD compatible biopsy. The IgA tTG test was positive in 5 of the 10 patients with CC (including those 3 cases finally diagnosed with CD) and in 13 from control population (100% and 92% sensitivity, respectively). 5 patients with CC were considered as gluten sensitive (serology positive, but no enteropathy).CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to determine a higher prevalence of CD and gluten sensitivity in patients complaining of CC. This prevalence was almost four times greater than that estimated for the general Argentinean population (1/133).
Subject(s)
Celiac Disease , Constipation , Glutens/adverse effects , Public Health , ArgentinaABSTRACT
AIM: To establish the diagnostic performance of several serological tests, individually and in combination, for diagnosing celiac disease (CD) in patients with different pretest probabilities, and to explore potential serological algorithms to reduce the necessity for biopsy. METHODS: We prospectively performed duodenal biopsy and serology in 679 adults who had either high risk (n = 161) or low risk (n = 518) for CD. Blood samples were tested using six assays (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) that detected antibodies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP). RESULTS: CD prevalence was 39.1% in the high-risk population and 3.3% in the low-risk group. In high-risk patients, all individual assays had a high diagnostic efficacy [area under receiving operator characteristic curves (AU ROC): 0.968 to 0.999]. In contrast, assays had a lower diagnostic efficacy (AU ROC: 0.835 to 0.972) in the low-risk group. Using assay combinations, it would be possible to reach or rule out diagnosis of CD without biopsy in 92% of cases in both pretest populations. We observed that the new DGP/tTG Screen assay resulted in a surplus compared to more conventional assays in any clinical situation. CONCLUSION: The DGP/tTG Screen assay could be considered as the best initial test for CD. Combinations of two tests, including a DGP/tTG Screen, might be able to diagnose CD accurately in different clinical scenarios making biopsy avoidable in a high proportion of subjects.
