ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether once-daily Concerta extended-release (XR) methylphenidate (MPH) is associated with: (1) better compliance; (2) decreased likelihood of accidents/injuries; and (3) lower health-care resource use over a 1-year period than 3-times-daily immediate-release (IR) MPH in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: Multivariate regression analyses were performed using an administrative database. Inclusion criteria were: (1) an age of 6-12 years at the date of first prescription for XR/IR MPH (index date); (2) patient-level data available for least 6 months before and 12 months after the index date; (3) no ADHD medications in the 6-month prior period; and (4) no XR MPH use by the IR MPH group. RESULTS: IR MPH: n=344, mean age 9.55 years, 76% male; XR MPH: n=1431, mean age 9.78 years, 75% male. XR MPH patients were less likely to discontinue, less likely to switch, and more likely to persist (i.e., no gaps >14 days) with therapy (p <0.0001). Children receiving XR MPH were less likely to experience an accident or injury (OR=0.58, 95% CI 0.353-0.945). Use of XR MPH was associated with significantly fewer emergency room visits and general practitioner visits per patient, on average, over 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the use of XR MPH with its simplified dosing regimen for children with ADHD.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Methylphenidate/administration & dosage , Patient Compliance , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control , Child , Databases, Factual , Delayed-Action Preparations , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic-induced weight gain occurs in a substantial percentage of treated persons. There remains a paucity of naturalistic data that describe relative weight-gain liability with the available novel atypical antipsychotics (NAPs). This investigation describes comparative NAP-induced weight gain in a prospective naturalistic cohort of persons with schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. METHODS: The Canadian National Outcomes Measurement Study in Schizophrenia (CNOMSS) is an ongoing prospective, longitudinal, naturalistic study involving 32 academic and community sites across Canada. Persons with DSM-IV-defined schizophrenia, schizophreniform or schizoaffective disorder, and psychosis not otherwise specified were consecutively enrolled. The overarching objectives of this initiative were to collect and compare global effectiveness, tolerability, safety, and humanistic outcomes in persons receiving commercially available NAPs in Canada. This analysis reports only weight change with the respective NAPs. Other outcomes were reported in separate companion papers. RESULTS: A spectrum of weight-gain liability was noted with quetiapine (QUE) (mean 7.55 kg, SD 9.20; P = 0.28), olanzapine (OLZ) (mean 3.72 kg, SD 0.56; P = 0.15), and risperidone (RIS) (mean 1.62 kg, SD 7.72; P = 0.43). Categorically defined weight gain (that is, over 7% of baseline weight) was observed in 55.6% of QUE patients, 24.1% of OLZ patients, and 23.7% of RIS patients. Adjusting for demographic and disease-specific confounding factors, QUE patients had greater odds of gaining over 7% of their baseline weight compared with RIS patients (odds ratio [OR] 3.62; 95% CI, 1.02 to 12.83; P = 0.05). No statistical difference was detected between OLZ patients and RIS patients for over 7% of baseline weight (OR 1.54; 95% CI, 0.63 to 3.75; P = 0.12) or over 10% weight gain (OR 1.44; 95% CI, 0.50 to 4.13; P = 0.58). CONCLUSION: Clinicians are reminded to monitor anthropometric and metabolic parameters in all NAP-treated persons. Clinically significant differences in weight gain liability exist among the available NAPs.
