Does Preoperative Testosterone Administration Decrease Complications in Distal Hypospadias Repair With Urethroplasty?

PURPOSE: Testosterone administration prior to hypospadias repair is common practice among pediatric urologists; however, its impact on surgical outcomes remains controversial. We hypothesize that testosterone administration prior to distal hypospadias repair with urethroplasty significantly decreases postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried our hypospadias database for primary distal hypospadias repairs with urethroplasty from 2015 to 2021. Patients undergoing repair without urethroplasty were excluded. We collected information on patient age, procedure type, testosterone administration status, initial visit and intraoperative glans width, urethroplasty length, and postoperative complications. To determine the role of testosterone administration on incidence of complications, a logistic regression adjusting for initial visit glans width, urethroplasty length, and age was performed. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients underwent distal hypospadias repair with urethroplasty. One hundred thirty-three patients received testosterone and 235 did not. Initial visit glans width was significantly larger in the no-testosterone vs testosterone group (14.5 mm vs 13.1 mm, P = .001). Testosterone patients had significantly larger glans width at the time of surgery (17.1 mm vs 14.6 mm [no-testosterone group], P = .001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis after controlling for age at surgery, preoperative glans width, testosterone status, and urethroplasty length, testosterone administration did show significant association with reduced odds of postoperative complications (OR 0.4, P = .039). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review of patients shows that on multivariable analysis there is significant association between testosterone administration and decreased incidence of complications in patients undergoing distal hypospadias repair with urethroplasty. Future studies on testosterone administration should focus on specific cohorts of patients with hypospadias as benefits of testosterone may be more evident in some subgroups than others.

Caudal anesthesia is not associated with post-operative complications following distal hypospadias repair.

INTRODUCTION: The use of caudal anesthesia at the time of hypospadias repair remains controversial as some prior studies have reported increased postoperative complication rates associated with caudal nerve block. However, these results have been called into question due to confounding factors and heterogeneous study groups. OBJECTIVE: Given the importance of identifying true risk factors associated with increased hypospadias complication rate, we examined our experience with caudal anesthesia limiting our analysis to distal repairs. We hypothesized that caudal anesthesia would not be associated with increased postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional hypospadias database from June 2007 to January 2021. All boys who underwent single-stage distal hypospadias repair with either caudal or penile block with minimum 1 month follow up were included. Records were reviewed to determine the type of local anesthesia, type of hypospadias repair, all complications, and time to complication. Association between any complication and local anesthesia type was evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for age at surgery and type of repair. A sub-analysis was performed for complications occurring ≤30 days. RESULTS: Overall, 1008 boys, 832 (82.5%) who received caudal and 176 (17.5%) penile block, were included. Median age at surgery was 8.1 months and median follow up was 13 months. Overall complication rate was 16.4% with 13.8% of patients requiring repeat operation. Median time to complication was 10.59 months and was significantly shorter in the caudal group (8.45 vs. 25.2 months). Caudal anesthesia was associated with higher likelihood of complication on univariate analysis; however, this was not true on multivariate analysis when controlling for age and type of repair. Caudal anesthesia was not associated with increased likelihood of complication within 30 days. DISCUSSION: Since the association between caudal anesthesia and hypospadias complications was first suggested, several studies have tried to answer this question with variable results. Our findings add to the evidence that there is no association between caudal anesthesia and increased hypospadias complications in either the short or long term. The major strengths of our study are a large, homogenous study population, robust follow up and inclusion of data from 14 surgeons over 14 years. Limitations include the study's retrospective nature as well as lack of standardized follow up protocol throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for possible confounders, caudal nerve block was not associated with increased risk of postoperative complications following distal hypospadias repair.

Does ketorolac administration at the time of hypospadias surgery increase unplanned encounters in the immediate postoperative period?

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVE: The opioid crisis has raised concerns for long-term sequela of routine administration of opioids to patients, particularly in the pediatric population. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use is limited in hypospadias surgery due to concerns for post-operative bleeding, particularly with ketorolac. We hypothesize that ketorolac administration at the time of hypospadias repair is not associated with increased bleeding or immediate adverse events. METHODS: A retrospective single institution study included all patients undergoing hypospadias surgery from 2018 to 2021. Outcomes measured include peri-operative ketorolac administration, opioid prescriptions, and unplanned encounters (i.e., emergency department or office visits). Comparative statistics using non-parametric and binary/categorical tests and a logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: 1044 patients were included, among whom there were 562 distal, 278 proximal and 204 hypospadias complication repairs. Ketorolac was administered to 396 (37.9%) patients and its utilization increased during the study period [Summary Figure]. Patients receiving ketorolac were older (p = 0.002) and were prescribed opioids less often after surgery (2.0% vs 5.2%, p = 0.009). There was no difference in unplanned encounters across repair types (p = 0.1). Multivariate logistic regression showed ketorolac use was not associated with an increased likelihood of an unplanned encounter. DISCUSSION: The use of NSAIDs post-operatively has traditionally been limited due to concerns about bleeding risks, however the present study displayed no significant increases in unplanned patient encounters either in the ED or outpatient clinic after ketorolac administration. Our study has several limitations including its retrospective and single-institutional design, difficulties of pain assessment in pediatric population, and possibility of under estimation of unplanned encounters due to limited access to patients' records outside of our institution. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ketorolac is not associated with an increase in unplanned encounters in children undergoing hypospadias repair. It should be considered a safe agent for perioperative analgesia to decrease opioid utilization. Further studies will evaluate long-term surgical outcomes in children receiving ketorolac after hypospadias repair.

Quantifying Glans Width Changes in Response to Preoperative Androgen Stimulation in Patients Undergoing Hypospadias Repair.

PURPOSE: Testosterone (T) administration prior to hypospadias surgery to increase glans size remains controversial. Understanding T's effect on glans width (GW) is essential to understanding its potential impact on surgical outcomes. We hypothesized that preoperative T in prepubertal boys significantly increases GW at the time of hypospadias surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our single institutional database was queried to identify patients who underwent hypospadias surgery from 2016 to 2020, in which data for T administration and GW were available. Descriptive, nonparametric and categorical statistics were performed as indicated. RESULTS: A total of 579 patients were eligible for analysis. Median age at surgery was 0.9 years (IQR 0.6-1.6). A total of 247/579 patients (42.7%) received T. The median GW at surgery was 15 mm (IQR 13-17). When comparing patients who had T administered to those who did not, we found a significant difference in GW at surgery (16 mm vs 14 mm, p <0.001). The median change in GW from the office to surgery was 4 mm for those receiving T vs 0 mm for those not receiving T (p <0.001). We identified a greater change in GW from preoperative to intraoperative measurements in patients who received 2 doses of T vs 1 dose (4 mm vs 2 mm, p <0.001). A histogram plot revealed the distribution of GW change at surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In our prospectively collected cohort of patients undergoing hypospadias surgery, we were able to quantitate the change in GW from preoperative T. Two doses of T resulted in a significant increase in GW vs 1 dose.