ABSTRACT
AIM: The prevalence of diabetes has been increasing over the past few decades. The objective of this study is to assess the time trends in diabetes between 1994 and 2017 in Jordan. METHODS: Surveys were conducted in 1994, 2004, 2009 and 2017 by the same investigators using generally similar methods. Fasting blood glucose was measured in all surveys. Variables were obtained using structured questionnaires designed specifically for the surveys. Crude and age-specific diabetes prevalence rates were derived for each sex, together with overall, crude and age-standardized prevalence rates. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes in men aged ≥ 25 years increased from 14.2% in 1994 to 18.3% in 2004, 26.8% in 2009 and 32.4% in 2017. The corresponding prevalence rates in women were 12.3%, 16.9%, 18.8%, and 18.1%, respectively. The overall age-standardized prevalence rate increased from 13.0% in 1994 to 17.1% in 2004, 22.2% in 2009 and 23.7% in 2017. Known diabetes in the 2017 survey accounted for 82.6% of people with diabetes. A HbA1c of < 59 mmol/mol (7.5%) was observed in 41.4% of participants with known diabetes. CONCLUSION: The results showed a high prevalence of diabetes in Jordan among people aged ≥ 25 years. Prevalence increased from 1994 to 2009, but slowed thereafter. The increase was greater in men than in women. Previously diagnosed diabetes accounted for a high percentage of people with diabetes in all surveys and was highest in 2017 survey, suggesting that the national strategy against diabetes has brought some benefits. Efforts should be made to improve glycaemic control in people with diabetes.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Health Surveys , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Jordan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Despite their reported benefits in terms of glycaemic control, insulin analogues are expensive for patients in developing countries. This study in Jordan aimed to compare the effectiveness and adverse events of premixed human insulin (BHI30) versus premixed insulin analogue (BIAsp30) in patients with type 2 diabetes. In a retrospective cohort study from October 2012 to March 2013, outcomes (HbA1c, weight, hypoglycaemia and lipohypertrophy) were compared at baseline and 6 months after treatment in 628 patients. BHI30 produced a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c than did BIAsp30. This difference in HbA1c remained significant after controlling for the effects of age, sex, duration of diabetes, body mass index and hypoglycaemia (ß-coefficient was -0.18 in favour of BHI30). Weight gain and mild hypoglycaemia was significantly higher with BHI30 than with BIAsp30. BHI30 achieved better reduction in HbA1c compared with BIAsp30, with less cost, slightly more weight gain and greater reported mild hypoglycaemia.
Subject(s)
Biphasic Insulins/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin Aspart/therapeutic use , Insulin, Isophane/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Aged , Biphasic Insulins/economics , Developing Countries , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/economics , Insulin/economics , Insulin Aspart/economics , Insulin, Isophane/economics , Jordan , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent worldwide and has been linked to many diseases. The aims of the present study were to assess the vitamin D status of Jordanians at the national level and to identify groups of the population at high risk for vitamin D deficiency. METHODS: Vitamin D status was assessed in a national sample of 5,640 subjects aged ≥7 years. The study involved interviews, laboratory measurements of 25(OH)D and others, and physical measurements. The present report deals, exclusively, with subjects aged >18 years. RESULTS: The prevalence of low vitamin D status [25(OH)D <30 ng/ml] was 37.3% in females compared to 5.1% in males. Dress style in females was independently related to low vitamin D status; women wearing 'Hijab' (adjusted OR = 1.7, p = 0.004) or 'Niqab' (adjusted OR = 1.5, p = 0.061) were at a higher risk for low vitamin D status than were western-dressed women. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of low vitamin D status in females in contrast with a low prevalence in males, together with a higher prevalence in women wearing Hijab or Neqab, calls for action to increase the population's awareness and to develop strategies to reduce this risk among women, particularly those wearing dress styles that cover most or all of their skin.