Percutaneous Management of Coronary Button Kinking After Emergency Aortic Root Replacement.

Surgical management of type A acute aortic dissection by the Bentall procedure involves attachment of the native coronary arteries to a synthetic valved-graft conduit (mechanical or biological aortic valve). In patients with normal anatomy and with careful surgical technique, formation of coronary buttons has been successful, and anastomotic complications after this procedure are rare. However, we describe the development of postoperative myocardial ischemia in a 46-year-old man caused by coronary button kinking after the Bentall procedure and reflect how one may avoid returning to the operating theater and still achieve a good outcome.

The effect of perhexiline on myocardial protection during coronary artery surgery: a two-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Perhexiline is thought to modulate metabolism by inhibiting mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1, reducing fatty acid uptake and increasing carbohydrate utilization. This study assessed whether preoperative perhexiline improves markers of myocardial protection in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery and analysed its effect on the myocardial metabolome. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients at two centres were randomized to receive either oral perhexiline or placebo for at least 5 days prior to surgery. The primary outcome was a low cardiac output episode in the first 6 h. All pre-specified analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle with a statistical power of 90% to detect a relative risk of 0.5 and a conventional one-sided α-value of 0.025. A subset of pre-ischaemic left ventricular biopsies was analysed using mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. RESULTS: Over a 3-year period, 286 patients were randomized, received the intervention and were included in the analysis. The incidence rate of a low cardiac output episode in the perhexiline arm was 36.7% (51/139) vs 34.7% (51/147) in the control arm [odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-1.50, P = 0.74]. Perhexiline was associated with a reduction in the cardiac index at 6 h [difference in means 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.31, P = 0.001] and an increase in inotropic support in the first 12 h (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.89, P = 0.015). There were no significant differences in myocardial injury with troponin-T or electrocardiogram, reoperation, renal dysfunction or length of stay. No difference in the preischaemic left ventricular metabolism was identified between groups on metabolomics analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative perhexiline does not improve myocardial protection in patients undergoing coronary surgery and in fact reduced perioperative cardiac output, increasing the need for inotropic support. Perhexiline has no significant effect on the mass spectrometry-visible polar myocardial metabolome in vivo in humans, supporting the suggestion that it acts via a pathway that is independent of myocardial carnitine palmitoyltransferase inhibition and may explain the lack of clinical benefit observed following surgery. CLINICALTRIALSGOV ID: NCT00845364.

Prospective peer review of regional percutaneous interventional procedures: a tool for quality control and revalidation.

AIMS: Current quality measures of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures are based on the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). This crude marker ignores the many clinical nuances that make for sound decision making in PCI. We have established a prospective peer review audit tool to determine the quality of PCI within our cardiac network, which consists of five PCI hospitals serving a population of 1.4 million people in Sussex, UK. METHODS AND RESULTS: Analysis of 10% of all PCI cases selected at random each month by a non-clinical audit manager is made by a rotating panel of two PCI operators and one cardiac surgeon. Each PCI case is assessed for anatomical suitability, lesion severity, strategic appropriateness and final outcome. Panel findings were reported back to the operator and the audit manager. A total of 326 cases were assessed by the review committee. Results were disseminated to individual operators. Coronary anatomy and lesion severity were considered appropriate for PCI in 94.2% and 96.0% of cases, respectively. Appropriateness of strategy was confirmed in 86.2% and the outcome considered satisfactory in 90.8%. A total of 242 subsequent cases were analysed to assess practice trends. This analysis demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in clinical decision making with respect to appropriateness of strategy (from 86.2% to 92.6%; p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective peer review of percutaneous coronary intervention cases by a rotating regional committee is valuable in ensuring procedural quality.

Recurrent strokes caused by a malpositioned pacemaker lead.

This case report illustrates the case of a patient who developed recurrent strokes after a pace maker lead was inserted into his left ventricle. It was removed successfully by the cardiothoracic surgeons but he remained very dependent functionally. This case highlights the importance of always reviewing the electrocardiogram and chest radiograph after the insertion of a pacemaker as late diagnosis of this complication can leave the patient with significant morbidity.

The efficacy of intraoperative atrial radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation during concomitant cardiac surgery-the Surgical Atrial Fibrillation Suppression (SAFS) Study.

INTRODUCTION: Studies assessing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) performed at the time of concomitant cardiac surgery have reported high success rates. The efficacy of this treatment has primarily been determined by a single electrocardiogram (ECG) or 24-h Holter monitor at follow-up. We sought to assess the true efficacy of this procedure using prolonged cardiac rhythm monitoring. METHODS: One hundred patients with paroxysmal (n = 47) and persistent AF (n = 53) requiring cardiac surgery were enrolled. Patients were clinically reviewed 6 weeks post-operatively and were monitored with 7-day Holter with full disclosure, 6 months post-surgery. A cohort of 50 patients also underwent 7 day Holter monitoring preoperatively. AF recurrence was defined as >30 s of AF. RESULTS: At 6 months, 75% of patients were in sinus rhythm according to a single ECG. However, only 62% of patients were free from AF on 7-day Holter; all AF episodes in these patients were asymptomatic. The procedure resulted in a significant decrease in AF burden from 56.2% at baseline to 27.5% at 6 months follow-up, (p < 0.001). Predictors of AF recurrence were (1) pre-operative AF duration; (2) persistent compared with paroxysmal AF; (3) increasing left atrial diameter and (4) requirement for mitral valve surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical RFA for the treatment of AF, during concomitant cardiac surgery, is a successful procedure and significantly reduces AF burden. However, 13% of patients have asymptomatic AF episodes only identified with continuous monitoring. This has important implications for post-operative anti-arrhythmic and anticoagulant management and for the definition of surgical AF ablation success.

Antithrombotic therapy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: ACTION Registry survey results.

AIMS: A variety of antithrombotic regimens have been described for the early postoperative period after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study reviews antithrombotic practice for patients undergoing bioprosthetic AVR with or without coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) amongst the centers participating in the ACTION (Anticoagulation Treatment Influence on Postoperative Patients) Registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: An antithrombotic therapy questionnaire was answered by the 49 centers participating in the ACTION Registry located in Europe, Middle East, Canada and Asia. The 43% of centers prescribe vitamin K antagonist (VKA), 20% prescribe VKA and acetyl salicylic acid (ASA), 33% prescribe only ASA and 4% do not prescribe any therapy after bioprosthetic AVR. For patients undergoing bioprosthetic AVR and CABG 39% of the centers prescribe VKA and ASA, 37% prescribe VKA and 24% prescribe ASA. After the first three postoperative months following bioprosthetic AVR, 61% of the centers prescribe only ASA, while 39% do not prescribe any therapy. Patients with bioprosthetic AVR and CABG receive ASA in 90% centers, in 2% centers VKA and ASA, and 8% centers do not prescribe any antithrombotic. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that, despite guidelines published by several professional societies, medical practice for the prevention of thrombotic events early after bioprosthetic AVR varies widely among cardiac surgical centers.