ABSTRACT
A 63-year-old male presented with a painful skin lesion on the left side of the neck and upper chest approximately two months prior to presentation. Diffuse erythematous to purplish-colored sclerotic patches were observed. He had been treated with intravenous antibiotics for two weeks for cellulitis, but the lesion did not improve. Punch biopsy, and neck computed tomography (CT) with contrast enhancement were performed to differentiate between cellulitis and scleroderma. Histopathological examination revealed infiltration of pleomorphic and poorly differentiated tumor cells extending into thickened collagen bundles, and mitotic activity. Based on histologic and radiologic findings, the patient was suspected to have poorly differentiated carcinoma, and further evaluation of the origin of the carcinoma was performed. A subareolar mass on the left breast was observed on chest CT, and a needle biopsy was performed; results were consistent with findings from the skin biopsy. Finally, the patient was diagnosed with carcinoma en cuirasse, a subtype of cutaneous metastasis of breast cancer, was transferred to oncology, and underwent palliative chemotherapy.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Treatment with filler injections using a microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFRF) device is a promising modality with proven efficacy for acne scar treatment. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and histologic differences of intradermal injection of a filler (poly-d, l-lactic acid, PDLA) using an MFRF device for the treatment of acne scars. METHODS: Patients with acne scars on both cheeks were included. Poly-d, l-lactic acid was injected via the MFRF device every 4 weeks for a total of 4 sessions. Patients were evaluated using the grading system for acne scars before each session, as well as personal satisfaction. For histologic evaluation, 2 patients (who consented) underwent a skin biopsy from the upper arm before and after the same single session. RESULTS: After the final session, the acne scar grading (échelle d'évaluation clinique des cicatrices d'acné) scale and visual analog scale for evaluation of satisfaction showed improvement compared with initial assessment (36.99% and 79.65% respectively [p < .001, respectively]). For histologic evaluation, biodegradation of PDLA materials and increase in collagen and elastic fibers were observed after 5 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: Intradermal injection of PDLA using the MFRF device could be used as an effective treatment with fewer side effects in acne scar patients with Fitzpatrick skin type III-IV.
