Tissue prostanoids as biomarkers for chemoprevention of colorectal neoplasia: correlation between prostanoid synthesis and clinical response in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Recent studies indicate that sulindac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), lowers mucosal prostanoid levels and regresses colorectal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). To determine whether they are biomarkers for sulindac-mediated chemoprevention of colorectal adenomas, levels of 5 prostanoids [prostaglandin (PG) D2, PGE2, PGF2alpha, thromboxane B2, and 6-keto-PGF1alpha] in the normal-appearing rectal mucosa from 7 FAP patients with a history of subtotal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis and 4 FAP patients without surgery, were measured in the absence or presence of exogenously added arachidonic acid before the initiation and at the end of 3 months of sulindac treatment. The addition of arachidonic acid resulted in a uniform increase in the levels of all 5 prostanoids although this increase was selectively attenuated in patients with ileorectal anastomosis who took sulindac. In the latter patients, arachidonic acid also augmented the inhibition of prostanoid synthesis by sulindac. In contrast, sulindac failed to attenuate the increase in prostanoid levels resulting from arachidonic acid in patients without previous surgery. Importantly, when measured in the presence of arachidonic acid, the reduction in the levels of all 5 prostanoids due to sulindac was statistically correlated with a reduction in the size and number of adenomas in the two groups of patients combined. These results suggest that tissue prostanoids measured in the presence of arachidonic acid may serve as sensitive and reliable biomarkers in monitoring the clinical responsiveness of FAP patients undergoing chemoprevention for colorectal neoplasia with NSAIDs.

Rectal epithelial apoptosis in familial adenomatous polyposis patients treated with sulindac.

BACKGROUND: Sulindac regresses colorectal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), although the mechanism of polyp regression is unclear. AIMS: To determine whether differences occur in alteration of rectal epithelial apoptotic index and expression of apoptosis related proteins in FAP patients treated with sulindac compared with placebo. PATIENTS: Twenty one FAP patients; 12 had not undergone colectomy. METHODS: Patients with FAP were treated with sulindac 150 mg orally twice a day for three months (n=10) or placebo (n=11). Colorectal polyp number was determined and biopsies of the normal rectal mucosa were performed before and after three months of treatment. Response to treatment and alteration of the apoptotic ratio (index in base of crypt divided by index in surface epithelium) were evaluated. Bcl-2, bax, p21/WAF-1, and p53 proteins were assessed semiquantitatively by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Significant decreases in polyp number and in the apoptotic ratio were seen in patients treated with sulindac compared with controls. The mean percentage change in polyp number from baseline was -46% in the sulindac group and +13% in the placebo group (p=0.005). Mean percentage change in the apoptotic ratio was -8% and +25% in the sulindac and placebo treated patients, respectively (p=0.004). No differences in expression or compartmentalisation of apoptosis related proteins were noted between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sulindac regression of colorectal adenomas is accompanied by alteration of the rectal epithelial apoptotic ratio with relative increase in apoptosis in surface cells compared with the deeper crypt. The utility of the apoptotic ratio as an intermediate biomarker for colorectal tumorigenesis deserves further study.

Size-dependent increase in prostanoid levels in adenomas of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Recent studies indicate that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have a chemopreventive effect against colorectal neoplasia. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibit cyclooxygenases, principal enzymes that mediate the formation of prostanoids. To determine whether prostanoids are involved in the pathogenesis of colorectal adenomas, we compared the levels of five major stable metabolic products of the cyclooxygenase pathway in the normal-appearing mucosa and in adenomas of patients with familial adenomatosis polyposis. Of 12 patients tested, 6 had elevated levels of at least one prostanoid in the adenomas. More importantly, the relative levels of three prostanoids [prostaglandin (PG)D2, PGE2, and 6-keto-PGF1alpha] were elevated in adenomas compared to normal-appearing mucosa from the same patients, and the resulting ratios were correlated with the size of the adenoma. These results suggest a role for prostanoids in progression of colorectal polyposis in familial adenomatosis polyposis patients.

Prostaglandin levels in human colorectal mucosa: effects of sulindac in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Recent evidence suggests that nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may prevent colorectal cancer. The mechanism of action of NSAIDs in chemoprevention is unknown but may be linked to their effect on mucosal prostaglandin levels. Levels of five major prostaglandin metabolites were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in biopsy specimens of flat rectal mucosa from four patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) before and after sulindac therapy and from five healthy individuals. The prostaglandin present at highest concentration in rectal mucosa from FAP and control subjects was prostaglandin E2. The concentration of thromboxane B2 alone was significantly elevated in FAP patients compared to controls (P = 0.016). In FAP patients treated with sulindac, all prostaglandin metabolite levels were significantly reduced compared to pretreatment levels (P < 0.05) except prostaglandin D2 (P = 0.07). Prostaglandins D2, E2, F2alpha, and 6-keto-F1alpha levels also were significantly reduced in FAP patients on sulindac compared to healthy controls (P < 0.05). However, interpatient heterogeneity of response to sulindac was evident with changes ranging from +19% to -89%, and the patient with the greatest reductions after sulindac developed colorectal cancer after 35 months of therapy. Sulindac treatment, at drug doses shown to regress colorectal adenomas in FAP patients, has heterogeneous effects on the level of major prostaglandins in their rectal mucosa and may not prevent colorectal cancer due to uncoupling of prostaglandin levels and carcinogenesis.

The use and interpretation of commercial APC gene testing for familial adenomatous polyposis.

BACKGROUND: The use of commercially available tests for genes linked to familial cancer has aroused concern about the impact of these tests on patients. Familial adenomatous polyposis is an autosomal dominant disease caused by a germ-line mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene that causes colorectal cancer if prophylactic colectomy is not performed. We evaluated the clinical use of commercial APC gene testing. METHODS: We assessed indications for APC gene testing, whether informed consent was obtained and genetic counseling was offered before testing, and the interpretation of the results through telephone interviews with physicians and genetic counselors in a nationwide sample of 177 patients from 125 families who underwent testing during 1995. RESULTS: Of the 177 patients tested, 83.0 percent had clinical features of familial adenomatous polyposis or were at risk for the disease-both valid indications for being tested. The appropriate strategy for presymptomatic testing was used in 79.4 percent (50 of 63 patients). Only 18.6 percent (33 of 177) received genetic counseling before the test, and only 16.9 percent (28 of 166) provided written informed consent. In 31.6 percent of the cases the physicians misinterpreted the test results. Among the patients with unconventional indications for testing, the rate of positive results was only 2.3 percent (1 of 44). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent genetic tests for familial adenomatous polyposis often received inadequate counseling and would have been given incorrectly interpreted results. Physicians should be prepared to offer genetic counseling if they order genetic tests.

Ornithine decarboxylase and polyamines in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), due to germ-line mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene, is characterized by development of colorectal adenomas and ultimately colorectal cancer. The usefulness of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity and polyamine levels in normal-appearing colorectal mucosa to stratify risk for colorectal neoplasia by discriminating presymptomatic individuals with germ-line APC mutation (genotype-positive) from genotype-negative family controls was evaluated in 36 at-risk subjects undergoing endoscopic and genetic screening for FAP. ODC activity and levels of putrescine, spermidine, and spermine were significantly higher in presymptomatic genotype-positive patients compared to genotype-negative persons (P = 0.029, <0.001, 0.002, and <0.001, respectively). Moreover, a putrescine level with a cutoff point of 1.5 nmol/mg protein was the most accurate single discriminator of risk status. ODC activity and polyamine levels are significantly elevated in gene carriers of FAP before the development of polyposis, suggesting a role for these compounds in tumorigenesis of FAP. These assays may be useful in evaluating at-risk members of FAP families in which mutation of the APC gene cannot be found.

Sulindac induced regression of colorectal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: evaluation of predictive factors.

BACKGROUND: Sulindac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, causes regression of colorectal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) but the response is variable. Specific clinical factors predictive of sulindac induced regression have not been studied. METHODS: 22 patients with FAP were given sulindac 150 mg orally twice a day. Polyp number and size were determined before treatment and at three months. The relation of nine clinical factors to polyp regression (per cent of baseline polyp number after treatment) was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: After three months of sulindac, polyp number had decreased to 45 per cent of baseline and polyp size to 50 per cent of baseline (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Univariate analysis showed greater polyp regression in older patients (p = 0.004), those with previous colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (p = 0.001), and patients without identifiable mutation of the APC gene responsible for FAP (p = 0.05). With multivariate regression analysis, response to sulindac treatment was associated with previous subtotal colectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Sulindac treatment seems effective in producing regression of colorectal adenomas of FAP patients with previous subtotal colectomy regardless of baseline polyp number and size. Changed sulindac metabolism, reduced area of the target mucosa, or changed epithelial characteristics after ileorectal anastomosis may explain these findings.

Treatment of colonic and rectal adenomas with sulindac in familial adenomatous polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Familial adenomatous polyposis is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by the formation of hundreds of colorectal adenomas and eventual colorectal cancer. Administration of the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug sulindac has been followed by regression of polyps in patients with this disorder, but no controlled trial of this drug in patients who have not had surgery has been reported. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 22 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, including 18 who had not undergone colectomy. The patients received sulindac at a dose of 150 mg orally twice a day for nine months or identical-appearing placebo tablets. The number and size of the polyps were evaluated every three months for one year. RESULTS: A statistically significant decrease in the mean number of polyps and their mean diameter occurred in patients treated with sulindac, as compared with those given placebo. When treatment was stopped at nine months, the number of polyps had decreased to 44 percent of base-line values and the diameter of the polyps to 35 percent of base-line values (P = 0.014 and P < 0.001, respectively, for the comparison with the changes in the group given placebo). No patient had complete resolution of polyps. Three months after treatment with sulindac was stopped, both the number and the size of the polyps increased in sulindac-treated patients but remained significantly lower than the values at base line. No side effects from sulindac were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Sulindac reduces the number and size of colorectal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, but its effect is incomplete, and it is unlikely to replace colectomy as primary therapy.