Technical and Conceptual Review on the L5-S1 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Surgery (OLIF51).

Lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) has been gaining popularity among the spine surgeons dealing with degenerative spinal diseases while LLIF on L5-S1 is still challenging for its technical and anatomical difficulty. OLIF51 procedure achieves effective anterior interbody fusion based on less invasive anterior interbody fusion via bifurcation of great vessels using specially designed retractors. The technique also achieves seamless anterior interbody fusion when combined with OLIF25. A thorough understanding of the procedures and anatomical features is mandatory to avoid perioperative complications.

Neutral hip position for the oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach increases the retroperitoneal oblique corridor.

BACKGROUND: The prepsoas lateral approach for spinal fusion, oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), is considered one of the minimally invasive spinal fusion methods and is gaining popularity due to improved outcomes with copious supporting evidence. To date, no publication has studied the various positions of the left hip in actual patients which might affect the retroperitoneal oblique corridor (ROC). The study aimed to find the relevancy of the left hip position and the size of ROC. METHODS: We recruited 40 consecutive patients who needed diagnostic MRI from the out-patient clinic. MRI scan from L2 to L5 was performed in the supine, right lateral decubitus with hip flexion, and right lateral decubitus with hip in a neutral position. The retroperitoneal oblique corridor (ROC) was measured at the intervertebral disc level and compared. RESULTS: ROC of the hip in neutral position was significantly larger than hip flexion in all levels (p < 0.05); there was no significant difference in the ROC among levels (p = 0.22). ROC seems to be largest at L2/3 followed by L3/4 and L4/5 respectively in all positions. CONCLUSIONS: The retroperitoneal oblique corridors of L2 to L5 were significantly increased when the hip is in the neutral position, while the psoas cross-sectional area and anterior thickness were minimized in this position. Surgeons might benefit from a neutral position of the left hip in the oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) procedure. In conclusion, the retroperitoneal oblique corridors of L2 to L5 were significantly increased when the hip is in the neutral position, while the psoas cross-sectional area and anterior thickness were minimized in this position. Surgeons might benefit from a neutral position of the left hip in the oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedure.

Iliolumbar Vein: Anatomy and Surgical Importance During Lateral Transpsoas and Oblique Approaches to Lumbar Spine.

OBJECTIVE: Safe surgical approaches to the anterolateral lumbar spine require a good working knowledge of the anatomy and anatomic variations of this region. As the iliolumbar vein is in the vicinity of both oblique and lateral transpsoas approaches to the lower lumbar spine, the following study was performed to better elucidate its anatomy, variations, and position during such surgical procedures. METHODS: Fifteen (30 sides) fresh frozen adult cadavers underwent dissection of the iliolumbar vein (ILV). The origin, course, variants, relations, and morphometrics of each vein were documented. Fluoroscopy of the vessels was performed. Lastly, anterior oblique and lateral transpsoas approaches to the lumbar spine were carried out in order to evaluate for potential ILV injury. RESULTS: An ILV was found on all but 2 sides (93.3%). It arose as a common trunk from the common iliac vein on 14 sides. Left ILVs tended to have a more distal origin than right ILVs. ILVs had a mean length of 3.7 cm and a mean width of 0.9 cm and were significantly larger on right versus left sides (P < 0.05). Left-sided ILVs tended to have more branches than right-sided veins. The majority of vertical branches of the ILV traveled anterior to the ventral rami of the lumbar spinal nerves, most commonly L4. The ILV and, in particular, its vertical branches coursed next to the L4 and L5 vertebrae. CONCLUSIONS: The ILV should be considered during both oblique and lateral transpsoas approaches to the lumbar spine.

Salvage Strategy for Failed Spinal Fusion Surgery Using Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion technique: A Technical Note.

INTRODUCTION: Failed spinal fusion surgery sometimes requires salvage surgery when symptomatic, especially with postsurgical decrease in intervertebral disc height followed by foraminal stenosis. For such cases, an anterior approach to lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) provides safe, direct access to the pathological disc space and a potential improvement in the fusion rate. One LLIF approach, oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), targets the oblique lateral window of the intervertebral discs to achieve successful lateral interbody fusion. The current technical note describes spinal revision surgery using the OLIF procedure. TECHNICAL NOTE: The subjects were patients with leg pain and/or lower back pain derived from decreased intervertebral height followed by foraminal stenosis due to failed spinal fusion surgery. These patients underwent additional OLIF surgery and posterior fusion with no additional posterior direct decompression. Their outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores at baseline and final follow-up. Bony union was also evaluated using computed tomography images at final follow-up. Six subjects were evaluated, with two representative cases described in detail. Four patients had an adjacent segment disorder, and the other two patients had pseudarthrosis due to postoperative infection. The mean JOA score improved from 5.7 ± 5.4 to 21.2 ± 2.3, with a mean recovery rate of 65.0%. All cases showed intervertebral bony union. CONCLUSIONS: We introduced a salvage strategy for failed posterior spine fusion surgery cases using the OLIF procedure. Patients effectively achieved recovered intervertebral and foraminal height with no additional posterior direct decompression.

Comparison of Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength Among Different Transpedicular Trajectories: A Finite Element Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Comparative biomechanical study by finite element (FE) method. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pullout strength of pedicle screws using different insertional trajectories. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw fixation has become the gold standard for spinal fusion, however, not much has been done to clarify how the fixation strength of pedicle screws are affected by insertional trajectories and bone properties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional FE models of 20 L4 vertebrae were constructed from the computed tomographic data. Five different transpedicular trajectories were compared: the traditional trajectory, the vertical trajectory, and the 3 lateral trajectories with different sagittal directions (caudal, parallel, cranial). For a valid comparison, screws of the same shape and size were inserted into the same pedicle in each subject, and the pullout strength were compared with nonlinear FE analyses. In addition, the pullout strength was correlated with bone mineral density (BMD). RESULTS: The mean pullout strength showed a 3.9% increase for the vertical trajectory relative to the traditional trajectory, 6.1% for the lateral-caudal trajectory, 21.1% for the lateral-parallel trajectory, and 34.7% for the lateral-cranial trajectory. The lateral-cranial trajectory demonstrated the highest value among all trajectories (P<0.001). In each trajectory, the correlation coefficient between the pullout strength and BMD of the femoral neck (r=0.74-0.83, P<0.01) was higher than the mean BMD of all the lumbar vertebrae (r=0.49-0.75, P<0.01), BMD of the L4 vertebra (r=0.39-0.64, P<0.01), and regional BMD of the L4 pedicle (r=0.53-0.76, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Regional variation in the vertebral bone density and the amount of denser bone-screw interface contribute to the differences of stiffness among different screw trajectories. BMD of the femoral neck is considered to be a better objective predictor of pedicle screw stability than that of the lumbar vertebra.

Cortical Bone Trajectory for Thoracic Pedicle Screws: A Technical Note.

STUDY DESIGN: A morphometric measurement of new thoracic pedicle screw trajectory using computed tomography and a biomechanical study on cadaveric thoracic vertebrae using insertional torque. OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new thoracic pedicle screw trajectory which maximizes engagement with denser bone. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) which maximizes the thread contact with cortical bone provides enhanced screw purchase. Despite the increased use of CBT screws in the lumbar spine, no study has yet reported the insertional technique for thoracic CBT. METHODS: First, the computed tomography scans of 50 adults were studied for morphometric measurement of lower thoracic CBT. The starting point was determined to be the intersection of the lateral two thirds of the superior articular process and the inferior border of the transverse process. The trajectory was straight forward in the axial plane angulated cranially targeting the posterior third of the superior endplate. The maximum diameter, length, and the cephalad angle were investigated. Next, the insertional torque of pedicle screws using this new technique was measured and compared with that of the traditional technique on 24 cadaveric thoracic vertebrae. RESULTS: All morphometric parameters of thoracic CBT increased from T9 to T12 (the mean diameter: from 5.8 mm at T9 to 8.5 mm at T12; the length: from 29.7 mm at T9 to 32.0 mm at T12; and the cephalad angle: from 21.4 degrees at T9 to 27.6 degrees at T12). The mean maximum insertional torque of CBT screws and traditional screws were 1.02±0.25 and 0.66±0.15 Nm, respectively. The new technique demonstrated average 53.8% higher torque than the traditional technique (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The detailed morphometric measurement and favorable screw fixation stability of thoracic CBT are reported. The insertional torque using thoracic CBT technique was 53.8% higher than that of the traditional technique.

Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) procedure is aimed at mitigating some of the challenges seen with traditional anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and allows for interbody fusion at L1-S1. PURPOSE: The study aimed to describe the OLIF technique and assess the complication and fusion rates. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample is composed of 137 patients who underwent OLIF procedure. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were adverse events within 6 months of surgery: infection, symptomatic pseudarthrosis, hardware failure, vascular injury, perioperative blood transfusion, ureteral injury, bowel injury, renal injury, prolonged postoperative ileus (more than 3 days), incisional hernia, pseudohernia, reoperation, neurologic deficits (weakness, numbness, paresthesia), hip flexion pain, retrograde ejaculation, sympathectomy affecting lower extremities, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and cerebrovascular accident. The outcome measures also include fusion and subsidence rates based on computed tomography (CT) done at 6 months postoperatively. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 150 consecutive patients was performed to examine the complications associated with OLIF at L1-L5 (OLIF25), OLIF at L5-S1 (OLIF51), and OLIF at L1-L5 combined with OLIF at L5-S1 (OLIF25+OLIF51). Only patients who had at least 6 months of postoperative follow-up, including CT scan at 6 months after surgery, were included. Independent radiology review of CT data was performed to assess fusion and subsidence rates at 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients underwent fusion at 340 levels. An overall complication rate of 11.7% was seen. The most common complications were subsidence (4.4%), postoperative ileus (2.9%), and vascular injury (2.9%). Ileus and vascular injuries were only seen in cases including OLIF51. No patient suffered neurologic injury. No cases of ureteral injury, sympathectomy affecting the lower extremities, or visceral injury were seen. Successful fusion was seen at 97.9% of surgical levels. CONCLUSIONS: Oblique lateral interbody fusion is a safe procedure at L1-L5 as well as L5-S1. The complication profile appears acceptable when compared with LLIF and ALIF. The oblique trajectory mitigates psoas muscle and lumbosacral plexus-related complications seen with the lateral transpsoas approach. Furthermore, there is a high fusion rate based on CT data at 6 months.

Perioperative Complications in 155 Patients Who Underwent Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Surgery: Perspectives and Indications From a Retrospective, Multicenter Survey.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter survey. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the perioperative complications of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: OLIF has been widely performed to achieve minimally invasive, rigid lumbar lateral interbody fusion. The associated perioperative complications are not yet well described. METHODS: The participants were patients who underwent OLIF surgery under the diagnosis of degenerative lumbar diseases between April 2013 and May 2015 at 11 affiliated medical institutions. The collected data were classified into intraoperative and early-stage postoperative (≤1 mo) complications. The intraoperative complications were then subcategorized into organ damage (neural, vertebral, vascular, and others) and other complications, mainly related to instrumental failure. The collected data were also divided and analyzed based on whether the surgeon was certified to perform the surgery and the incidence of complications in the early (April 2013-March 2014) and late stages (April 2014-May 2015) of OLIF introduction. RESULTS: In the 155 included patients, 75 complications were reported (incidence rate, 48.3%). The most common complication was endplate fracture/subsidence (18.7%), followed by transient psoas weakness and thigh numbness (13.5%) and segmental artery injury (2.6%). Almost all these complications were transient, except for three patients who had permanent damage: one had ureteral injury and two had neurological injury. Postoperative complications included surgical site infection (1.9%) and reoperation (1.9%). Whether the primary operator was experienced did not affect the incidence of complications. Regarding the introductory stage, the incidence of complications was 50% in the early stage and 38% in the late stage. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of perioperative complications of OLIF surgery reached 48.3%, of which only 1.9% resulted in permanent damage. Our analysis based on surgeon experience indicated that the OLIF procedure could be performed without increasing incidence of complications, under the guidance of experienced supervisors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

One-Year Prospective Evaluation of the Technique of Percutaneous Cortical Bone Trajectory Spondylodesis in Comparison with Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Preliminary Report with Technical Note.

Background and Objective Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) spondylodesis is a novel screw fixation method in which screws are inserted through the pedicle in a caudal-medial to cephalad-lateral direction, providing a similar or more rigid spinal fixation compared with traditional pedicle screws. However, the traditional CBT technique requires invasive detaching and opening of the paraspinal muscle. In a small clinical prospective study we introduced a percutaneous CBT fixation technique by modifying the percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) technique and evaluated the short-term outcome. Materials and Methods We enrolled 40 patients with lower back pain (LBP) and limb r;adicular pain with a diagnosis of spondylolisthesis who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery. The patients were divided into two groups according to screw trajectory: the percutaneous CBT (pCBT) and the traditional PPS arms (20 patients in each). A consecutive group of 20 patients underwent traditional PPS, and the other underwent pCBT; dorsal spondylodesis was combined with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in both groups. Perioperative data such as operative time, blood loss, duration of fluoroscopy, and total incision length were investigated. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for LBP and leg pain at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results We observed no significant disadvantages in pCBT patients in perioperative and postoperative data compared with the PPS group. There were no complications. The pCBT patients showed a significantly shorter total incision length (p < 0.01) with a significantly shorter duration of fluoroscopy (p < 0.05). The postoperative VAS score was significantly improved in the pCBT group, especially 6 months after the surgery (p < 0.05). Conclusion The pCBT spondylodesis provided an outcome comparable with PPS fixation with a tendency for improvement 1 year postsurgery. This technique can be used in appropriate cases, combined with lumbar interbody fusion.

Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective consecutive clinical study to assess the decompressive benefit and outcome of oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate radiologically the effect of interbody distraction upon neural patency via an anterolateral retroperitoneal approach for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Traditional treatment for symptomatic lumbar stenosis uses direct posterior decompression with or without fusion. Symptoms of radiculopathy and neurological claudication may also be alleviated indirectly through restoration of intervertebral and foraminal heights and correction of spinal alignment. METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients presenting with degenerative conditions that included concomitant lumbar stenosis underwent oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation at 52 lumbar levels without neuromonitoring. Magnetic resonance images were obtained successfully for 48 of 52 levels. The cross-sectional area of the thecal sac (CSA) was measured preoperatively and postoperatively on T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance images. Differences in CSA were compared, and the relationship between the ratio of CSA extension and that of the preoperative CSA was assessed. The change in disc height and segmental disc angle were measured. The relationships between CSA, disc height, segmental disc angle, and clinical results were assessed by correlational analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight oblique lateral interbody fusions were performed successfully without neural complications. There was clinical improvement in all cases. The mean CSA increased from 99.6 mm preoperatively to 134.3 mm postoperatively (P<0.001). The median CSA extension ratio was 30.2% and this correlated inversely with preoperative CSA. Disc height, segmental disc angle, and clinical results improved significantly. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the preoperative CSA was the only independent factor that correlated inversely with the CSA extension ratio (corrected R=0.361; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Spinal stenosis was resolved successfully by indirect decompression through a miniopen anterolateral retroperitoneal approach without the need for neuromonitoring. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study.

OBJECT: Access to the intervertebral discs from L2-S1 in one surgical position can be challenging. The transpsoas minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach is preferred by many surgeons, but this approach poses potential risk to neural structures of the lumbar plexus as they course through the psoas. The lumbar plexus and iliac crest often restrict the L4-5 disc access, and the L5-S1 level has not been a viable option from a direct lateral approach. The purpose of the present study was to investigate an MIS oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral disc space in cadaveric specimens while keeping the specimens in a lateral decubitus position with minimal disruption of the psoas and lumbar plexus. METHODS: Twenty fresh-frozen full-torso cadaveric specimens were dissected, and an oblique anatomical corridor to access the L2-S1 discs was examined. Measurements were taken in a static state and with mild retraction of the psoas. The access corridor was defined at L2-5 as the left lateral border of the aorta (or iliac artery) and the anterior medial border of the psoas. The L5-S1 corridor of access was defined transversely from the midsagittal line of the inferior endplate of L-5 to the medial border of the left common iliac vessel and vertically to the first vascular structure that crosses midline. RESULTS: The mean access corridor diameters in the static state and with mild psoas retraction, respectively, were as follows: at L2-3, 18.60 mm and 25.50 mm; at L3-4, 19.25 mm and 27.05 mm; and at L4-5, 15.00 mm and 24.45 mm. The L5-S1 corridor mean values were 14.75 mm transversely, from midline to the left common iliac vessel and 23.85 mm from the inferior endplate of L-5 cephalad to the first midline vessel. CONCLUSIONS: The oblique corridor allows access to the L2-S1 discs while keeping the patient in a lateral decubitus position without a break in the table. Minimal psoas retraction without significant tendon disruption allowed for a generous corridor to the disc space. The L5-S1 disc space can be accessed from an oblique angle consistently with gentle retraction of the iliac vessels. This study supports the potential of an MIS oblique retroperitoneal approach to the L2-S1 discs.