ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers and poly-L-lactic acid (PLA) fillers are frequently used to correct facial wrinkles. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of a novel injectable poly-L-lactic acid (PLA) filler and a well-studied biphasic HA filler for the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomized, evaluator-blinded, comparative study, subjects were randomized for injections with PLA or HA into both nasolabial folds. Efficacy was determined by calculating the change in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) relative to baseline. Local safety was assessed by reported adverse events. RESULTS: At week 24, mean improvement in WSRS from baseline was 2.09 ± 0.68 for the PLA side and 1.54 ± 0.65 for the HA side. Both injections were well tolerated, and the adverse reactions were mild and transient in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: PLA provides noninferior efficacy compared with HA 6 months after being used to treat moderate to severe nasolabial folds.
Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Lactic Acid/administration & dosage , Nasolabial Fold , Polymers/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Injections/adverse effects , Lactic Acid/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Polyesters , Polymers/adverse effects , Skin Aging/drug effects , Viscosupplements/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although facial hyperhidrosis has been frequently associated with a diminished quality of life, various conservative modalities for its management are still far from satisfactory. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the antiperspirant efficacy and safety of the topical glycopyrrolate on facial hyperhidrosis at specified posttreatment intervals. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with facial hyperhidrosis were enrolled and treated with 2% topical glycopyrrolate on one-half of the forehead, whereas the other half of the forehead was treated with a placebo. All patients applied topical glycopyrrolate or placebo once a day for nine successive days. Each evaluation included weighing sweat and assessing the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) score and any adverse effects. RESULTS: Compared with the placebo-treated sides, topical glycopyrrolate-treated sides showed a reduction in the rate of sweat production at the forehead of 25.16 ± 10.30% (mean ± SD) at 90 min after the first application (day 1), 29.63 ± 7.74% at 24 h after the first application (day 2) and 36.68 ± 11.41% at 24 h after eight additional successive daily applications (day 10) (all P < 0.025). There was a little more decrease in HDSS score with the topical glycopyrrolate-treated half of the forehead, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.025). No serious adverse events were reported during the course of this study. Only one patient developed a transient headache after treatment. CONCLUSION: Topical glycopyrrolate application appears to be significantly effective and safe in reducing excessive facial perspiration.
