ABSTRACT
The mechanical efficiency of positive work was studied in six subjects performing three different types of exercises. On the first occasion the subjects ran on a motor-driven treadmill at 3.33 m s-1; the second and the third exercises consisted of performing rhythmical vertical jumps for 1 min both in rebound (RJ) and no-rebound (NRJ) conditions. The mechanical efficiency calculated in NRJ, which reflects only the conversion of biochemical energy into mechanical work, was found to be lower than the corresponding observation in RJ, 17.2 vs. 27.8% (P less than 0.001), respectively. These differences could not be explained by only the storage and recoil of elastic energy occurring in RJ compared with NRJ. The calculated extra work delivered 'free' was greater than the potential elastic energy which could be stored within the leg extensor muscles (187 vs. 124 J for each jump, P less than 0.05). It is likely that other factors might be responsible for the extra work found in NRJ. It was suggested that the difference in the length of time to perform positive work between a simple shortening contraction and a stretch-shortening muscular activity could be also responsible for the enhanced efficiency observed in RJ. This suggestion was supported by the high relationship (P less than 0.001) found between the time to perform positive work and the mechanical efficiency measured in jumping and estimated during running.
Subject(s)
Mechanoreceptors/physiology , Muscle Contraction , Adult , Elasticity , Humans , Male , Physical Exertion , RunningABSTRACT
The running economy of seventeen athletes was studied during running at a low speed (3.3 m X s-1) on a motor-driven treadmill. The net energetic cost during running expressed in kJ X kg-1 X km-1 was on average 4.06. As expected, a positive relationship was found between the energetic cost and the percentage of fast twitch fibres (r = 0.60, n = 17, p less than 0.01). In addition, the mechanical efficiency during two different series of jumps performed with and without prestretch was measured in thirteen subjects. The effect of prestretch on muscle economy was represented by the ratio between the efficiency of muscular work performed during prestretch jumps and the corresponding value calculated in no prestretch conditions. This ratio demonstrated a statistically significant relationship with energy expenditure during running (r = -0.66, n = 13, P less than 0.01), suggesting that the elastic behaviour of leg extensor muscles is similar in running and jumping if the speeds of muscular contraction during eccentric and concentric work are of similar magnitudes.
