Mitral Repair With Complete Rings or Posterior Bands in Barlow Disease: Long-term Results.

BACKGROUND: Complete rings or posterior bands are both commonly used during mitral valve repair, but which one ensures the best long-term outcome in patients with Barlow disease is a topic of debate. This study evaluated whether the type of annuloplasty device affects the long-term durability of the repair. METHODS: We selected 296 consecutive patients with severe mitral regurgitation due to Barlow disease who underwent edge-to-edge mitral repair at our institution between 2004 and 2013. For the edge-to-edge repair, a complete semirigid ring was used in 151 patients, whereas a posterior flexible band was used in 145 patients. The clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of both groups were compared at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: At 14 years, the overall survival was 87.3% ± 2.79% in the ring group and 94.1% ± 2.30% in the band group (P = .056). The incidence of mitral valve reintervention was 4.9% ± 1.95% in the ring group and 5.5% ± 2.53% in the band group (P = .371) at 14 years. The incidence of recurrence of mitral regurgitation ≥3+ and ≥2+ was 8.3% ± 2.64% in the ring group and 8.7% ± 3.07% in the band group (P = .991) and 26.5% ± 4.23% in the ring group and 17.4% ± 3.26% in the band group (P = .697), respectively. Mitral regurgitation ≥1+ at discharge was the only independent predictor of reoperation and recurrence of mitral regurgitation ≥3+ in the long-term. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Barlow disease undergoing edge-to-edge mitral valve repair, the type of annuloplasty device does not influence the long-term results. Achieving an optimal immediate result remains the key to maintain the stability of the repair at long-term.

Long-term results of tricuspid annuloplasty with 3-dimensional-shaped rings: effective and durable!

OBJECTIVES: 3-Dimensional (3D)-shaped rings are largely adopted for tricuspid annuloplasty, but evidence about their long-term results is scanty. The goal of this study was to analyse the long-term results of tricuspid annuloplasty with 3D-shaped rings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database was carried out to identify all patients who underwent tricuspid valve repair with 3D-shaped rings between January 2011 and December 2014. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to analyse long-term survival. Cumulative incidence function using death as the competitive outcome was used to estimate cardiac death. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients were identified. The median age was 66 years. Eighty-two patients (49%) were in advanced New York Heart Association functional class III-IV. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was present in 101 (60%); the median ejection fraction was 60%. In 82 (49%) patients, a Medtronic 3D Contour annuloplasty ring was employed; in the remaining 86 (51%) patients, an Edwards MC3 ring was used. Cumulative incidence function of cardiac death, with non-cardiac death as a competing risk, was 1.9 ± 1.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.51-4.95) at 7 years. The cumulative incidence function of recurrence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) ≥2+ at 7 years was 14 ± 3.17%, 95% CI (8.49-20.82). Recurrence of TR ≥2+ at 7 years was not significantly different between the Medtronic 3D Contour and the Edwards MC3 rings (P = 0.3). AF was identified as the only independent predictor of recurrence of TR ≥2+. CONCLUSIONS: 3D-shaped rings are effective and durable. TR recurrence was relatively low at 7 years and usually moderate (2+/4+) without a significant difference between the 2 types of rings. The role of AF as a predictor of TR recurrence was confirmed.

Surgery from the future: Performing a safe valve-in-valve explantation.

As the number of young and relatively low-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation increases, the number who will require open heart surgery months or years later will also increase. Only a few cases of late transcatheter heart valve explantation (without root replacement) have been reported in the literature, and this rare procedure can be surgically very challenging. In this video tutorial we present the case of a patient with a valve-in-valve subacute thrombosis, and we describe the surgical technique for valve explantation.

Is myocardial revascularization really necessary in patients with ≥50% but <70% coronary stenosis undergoing valvular surgery?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the immediate and mid-term effects of omitting coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with moderate coronary artery stenosis who have a primary indication for valvular surgery. METHODS: We included 77 consecutive patients admitted to our Institution for aortic or mitral valve surgery between June 2012 and June 2017 in whom a de novo diagnosis of ≥50%, but <70% coronary stenosis was made. In this cohort, the myocardial revascularization was omitted. All these patients were free from angina and ischaemia on echo and ECG. RESULTS: There were no in-hospital deaths. In only 1 patient, acute myocardial infarction occurred postoperatively, which was immediately treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The 6-year overall survival was 94.7 ± 2.59%. At 6 years, no cardiac deaths were recorded. At follow-up, 4 patients underwent elective PCI after a positive stress myocardial perfusion test. Only 1 patient underwent urgent PCI due to acute coronary syndrome. At 6 years, the cumulative incidence function of PCI, with death as competing risk, was 8 ± 3.9%. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, moderate coronary stenosis, occasionally discovered at the time of valvular heart surgery, can be safely overlooked and do not need any further treatment at follow-up in the majority of cases. Our results open up the opportunity to apply this 'intentional omission strategy' in different situations, such as minimally invasive heart surgery, percutaneous procedures and complex patients.

Treatment of isolated tricuspid regurgitation in 2020: an update.

Tricuspid valve regurgitation is an insidious pathology that is associated with increased mortality if left untreated. Conversely, surgical correction of tricuspid regurgitation is burdened by poor outcomes, especially when right ventricular dysfunction, kidney disease, or liver disease occur. There is, therefore, increasing interest in transcatheter approaches as an alternative to surgery in patients at high or prohibitive surgical risk. The development of percutaneous devices to treat tricuspid regurgitation has several technical challenges, mainly because of the complexity of valve anatomy, thus requiring accurate patient selection. Here we review the currently available transcatheter approaches to treat severe tricuspid regurgitation.

Surgical Techniques for Tricuspid Valve Disease.

Tricuspid valve disease affects millions of patients worldwide. It has always been considered less relevant than the left-side valves of the heart, but this "forgotten valve" still represents a great challenge for the cardiac surgeons, especially in the most difficult symptomatic scenarios. In this review we analyze the wide spectrum of surgical techniques for the treatment of a diseased tricuspid valve.

Durability at 19 Years of Quadrangular Resection With Annular Plication for Mitral Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: We report the long-term (19 years) clinical and echocardiographic results of the quadrangular resection with annular plication and annuloplasty. METHODS: Included were 145 consecutive patients (mean age, 58 ± 11.1 years; left ventricular ejection fraction, 0.59 ± 0.095) with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation due to posterior leaflet prolapse/flail who underwent quadrangular resection of the posterior leaflet combined with ring (127 patients [87.5%]) or pericardium (18 patients [12.5%]) annuloplasty. RESULTS: No hospital deaths occurred. At hospital discharge, all patients but 1 had none or trivial mitral regurgitation. Follow-up was 97% complete (median, 19 years; interquartile range, 18 to 20 years). At 20 years, the overall survival was 74% ± 3.7%. At 19 years, cumulative incidence function of cardiac death with noncardiac death as a competing risk was 9.9% ± 2.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7% to 15.5%). Age was the only significant predictor of cardiac death (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.1; p = 0.01) at multivariate analysis. Only 6 patients (4%) were reoperated on for recurrent severe mitral regurgitation. At 19 years, cumulative incidence function of reoperation and recurrence of mitral regurgitation 3+ or higher with death as a competing risk was 4.3% ± 1.7% (95% CI, 1.7% to 8.8%) and 8.8% ± 2.8% (95% CI, 4.3% to 15.5%), respectively. Indeed, only 11 patients (8%) had recurrent mitral insufficiency 3+ or higher. No predictor of reoperation and recurrence of mitral regurgitation 3+ or higher was identified. At the last follow-up, moderate mitral regurgitation (2+/4+) was detected in 14 patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Quadrangular resection with annular plication for posterior leaflet prolapse, combined with annuloplasty, is associated with a very low probability of reoperation and recurrent mitral regurgitation for up to 2 decades after the operation. These results provide reference values to which all of the other more recently introduced surgical and transcatheter options need to be compared.

Aortic sutureless Perceval valve for small root in concomitant mitral valve replacement.

Conventional valves have a sewing ring that reduces the effective orifice area for a given valve size. In patients with small aortic roots, the implantation of a stented conventional prosthesis can be very difficult or may lead to patient-prosthesis mismatch. In the case of the Sorin Perceval sutureless aortic valve, concomitant mitral valve replacement (MVR) is an exclusion criterion because the latter valve's rigid ring may interfere with the self-expandable stent anchorage of the Sorin Perceval sutureless valve, or cause it to become distorted. The case is reported of very small, 77-year-old woman with severe aortic valve stenosis, severe mitral regurgitation and asymmetric hypertrophy of the left ventricle with systolic anterior motion. The patient underwent MVR and concomitant off-label implantation of the Sorin Perceval S sutureless valve due to the extremely small size of the aortic annulus. Echocardiography performed on completion of surgery, at discharge from hospital and at after a four-month follow up, documented a normal mitral prosthesis position and function, a normal aortic prosthesis position, and mild central regurgitation in both valves.

Long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement after previous left-side heart surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To assess long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) after previous left-side heart surgery. METHODS: We reviewed reoperative TVR after left-side heart surgery performed at our institution between March 1997 and June 2012. In-hospital data were retrieved from our institutional database or medical records; follow-up was performed through telephone call, surviving patients being asked to provide a recent (≤6 months) echocardiogram. RESULTS: Reoperative TVR was performed in 117 patients. Preoperative characteristics included: mean age 63.7 years, median logistic EuroSCORE (LES) 11.8, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class >2 in 79.5% of patients, right ventricle (RV) dysfunction >mild in 23.9% of patients and mean systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) 48.4 mmHg. A mechanical prosthesis was implanted in 5.1% of patients. A right thoracotomy was preferred to median sternotomy in 8.6% of cases. Isolated-TVR (I-TVR) was performed in 52.1% of patients, a beating-heart approach being used in 85.2% of I-TVR cases. Postoperative RV failure occurred in 46.1% of patients. Median length-of-stay was 11.5 days. Thirty-day mortality was 6.0% overall and 8.2% in the I-TVR group. Higher preoperative LES (P = 0.002), ascites (P = 0.004), RV dysfunction (P = 0.033) and sPAP (P = 0.046) were associated with acute mortality. No significant difference in acute outcomes was observed between beating and arrested-heart I-TVR, except for postoperative median length-of-stay (9 vs 28 days, respectively, P = 0.007). Among survivors median follow-up time was 5.1 years. Five-year and 10-year freedom from cardiac death were 79.4 and 61.0%, freedom from tricuspid reoperation were 97.3 and 87.5%, freedom from bioprosthesis degeneration were 92.8 and 74.3%, respectively. Five-year and 10-year survival in the I-TVR subgroup were respectively 74.4 and 61.6%. Higher preoperative sPAP was associated with increased follow-up mortality (P = 0.048). At the last follow-up, NYHA class I-II was found in 86.1% of surviving patients. CONCLUSIONS: In selected cases, TVR is currently feasible with low acute mortality, especially if performed in the absence of ascites, significant RV dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension. Long-term mortality remains more difficult to predict, although it appeared to be also associated with higher preoperative pulmonary pressure. The global high-complexity profile of these patients is likely to impair long-term outcomes.

Validation of a decision-making strategy for systolic anterior motion following mitral valve repair.

Low cardiac output syndrome and hypotension are dreadful consequences of systolic anterior motion (SAM) after a mitral valve (MV) repair. The management of SAM in the operating room remains controversial. We validate a recently suggested two-step management method and classification of this complication. This was a teaching hospital-based observational study. We validated a novel two-step conservative management method, consisting in intravascular volume expansion and discontinuation of inotropic drugs (step 1), and increasing the afterload by ascending aorta manual compression while administering esmolol e.v. (step 2). We also validate a novel classification of SAM: easy-to-revert (responding to step 1), difficult-to-revert (responding to step 2), or persistent. Fifty patients had an easy-to-revert while 26 had a difficult-to-revert SAM; 4 patients had a persistent condition (promptly diagnosed through our decisional algorithm) and underwent an immediate second pump run to repeat the mitral repair surgery. We confirmed that SAM after a repair of a degenerative MV is common and validated a simple two-step conservative management method that allows to clearly identify those few patients who require immediate surgical revision.

A new technique for vascular access management in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: To describe results from a novel percutaneous technique designed to minimize the risk of hemorrhage in the event of a major complication during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. BACKGROUND: Vascular access management is a major challenge in transfemoral TAVI due to the large introducer sheathes required. METHODS: Fifty-two pts underwent TAVI between November 2007 and March 2009. Of these, 37 received an Edwards-Sapien Valve (23 mm valve: 17/37; 26 mm valve: 20/37) whilst 15 patients received a CoreValve (26 mm valve: 6/15; 29 mm valve: 9/15). Using a crossover technique, the opposing femoral artery was cannulated with a 7Fr long sheath. This allowed contralateral passage of a balloon and inflation in the proximal iliac. The sheath was then removed and Prostar sutures tied in a dry field. Balloon optimization of the puncture site was performed as required. RESULTS: In three subjects, elective surgical repair was undertaken due to excessive femoral arterial calcification. In the remaining 49, the crossover technique was employed and closed with two Prostar devices (Edwards-Sapien) or one (CoreValve). There were serious "on-table" complications in seven patients, six due to the large introducer sheathes used in the TAVI procedure-iliac avulsion, two iliac dissections, iliac perforation, common femoral perforation and scrotal hematoma. All were repaired safely by combined surgical and endovascular techniques, using the crossover technique to ensure patient stability. All made a good recovery and were independently ambulant at discharge. CONCLUSION: Using crossover balloon inflation as an adjunct to Prostar closure may be helpful for managing TAVI vascular access sites.

Small "functional" size after mechanical aortic valve replacement: no risk in young to middle-age patients.

BACKGROUND: The impact of a valve prosthesis-patient size mismatch is still controversial. In most studies, the inclusion of a large proportion of poorly active old patients with low cardiac output requirements may be misleading, due to the close correlation between trans-prosthetic gradients and cardiac output. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of small "functional" prosthesis sizes in active young to middle-age patients. METHODS: Eighty-three active patients with a mean age of 46 +/- 8 years and a high health survey questionnaire score were followed for 80 +/- 34 months after isolated aortic valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis. RESULTS: Patients with an indexed, Doppler derived, effective orifice area index less than 0.85 cm2/m2 (0.77 +/- 0.1 cm2/m2) showed higher early trans-prosthetic gradients (peak, 34 +/- 11 vs 26 +/- 8 mm Hg; P = 0.001) than patients with a larger effective orifice area index. However, significant regression of the left ventricular mass index and improvement of the left ventricular ejection fraction were observed in both groups at follow-up (119.8 +/- 26 vs 165.2 +/- 38 g/m2 and 128.5 +/- 25 vs 181.8 +/- 50 g/m2; P < 0.001; 58 +/- 6 vs 52 +/- 11% and 58 +/- 7 vs 53 +/- 10%; P < 0.001), with no differences between groups (P = 0.4 and P = 0.7, respectively). At multiple linear regression, the final left ventricular mass index was positively related to the preoperative left ventricular mass index (P = 0.004) and was unaffected by the effective orifice area index (P = 0.4). Symptomatic improvement (New York Heart Association class 1.3 +/- 0.4 vs 2.4 +/- 0.8 and 1.2 +/- 0.4 vs 2.2 +/- 0.8; P < 0.001) and freedom from late cardiac death (93 +/- 3% and 95 +/- 6%) were comparable between groups (P = 0.6 and P = 0.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that small "functional" prosthesis sizes with modern mechanical valves may not adversely affect outcomes of aortic valve replacement in young patients with high cardiac output requirements.