Evaluating therapeutic benefits of ubrogepant via latent class models: A post hoc exploratory analysis of the ACHIEVE I and ACHIEVE II trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an alternative method of defining acute treatment success in migraine by combining multiple indicators into a single dichotomous measure of success. BACKGROUND: Migraine is characterized by a symptom complex; combining these features as a single endpoint may improve the measurement of treatment effects and better predict patient satisfaction with treatment. METHODS: We used a confirmatory latent class model (LCM) with two latent classes interpreted as treatment success and treatment failure. Pooled data for placebo and ubrogepant 50 mg from the ACHIEVE I and ACHIEVE II trials and data for ubrogepant 100 mg from ACHIEVE I were used. LCM inputs included pre-dose and 2-h post-dose measures of pain severity (0-3), the presence/absence of associated symptoms (nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia [0 or 1]), and functional disability (0-3). All definitions were validated against satisfaction with study medication (SWSM) at 24 h post-dose; results were compared with 2-hour pain freedom (2hPF). RESULTS: This pooled analysis included 2247 participants. At 2 h post-dose in the ubrogepant 50 and 100 mg dose groups, 53.2% (472/887) and 54.9% (246/448) of participants, respectively, were classified as achieving treatment success using the LCM-based approach, compared to 39.0% (356/912) of participants in the placebo group. The results for treatment success using the 2hPF endpoint were 20.7% (184/887) and 21.5% (96/447) in the ubrogepant 50 and 100 mg dose groups, respectively, compared to 12.7% (116/912) for placebo. Using 24-h SWSM as an external validator, the LCM approach sensitivity and correct classification rates were higher than for 2hPF. CONCLUSION: The LCM approach led to higher rates of treatment success and greater separation between ubrogepant and placebo and was a more sensitive predictor of treatment satisfaction than the regulatory endpoint of 2hPF.

Fabry Disease Patient-Reported Outcome (FD-PRO) demonstrates robust measurement properties for assessing symptom severity in Fabry disease.

BACKGROUND: Fabry disease (FD) is a rare, genetic disease, that if untreated, progresses to irreversible and life-threatening renal, cardiac, and cerebrovascular events. FD symptoms impact daily functioning and quality of life, but no disease-specific measure of these symptoms has been psychometrically tested. METHODS: The Fabry Disease Patient-Reported Outcome (FD-PRO) consists of 19 items that measure neuropathic symptoms (pain, tingling, numbness and burning in upper/lower extremities), headache, abdominal pain, heat intolerance, swelling, tinnitus, fatigue, hearing/vision impairment, hypohidrosis (diminished sweating) and difficulty engaging in regular physical activities in the past 24 h. Measurement properties of the instrument were evaluated among 139 adult (≥ 18 years) FD diagnosed patients (enzyme deficiency in males; GLA genotyping in females) including enzyme replacement (ERT) treated or treatment-naïve patients, classic or late-onset phenotypes from ten countries and eighteen sites. Patients completed the FD-PRO daily on a handheld electronic diary for 4 weeks; demographic, other patient and clinician reported outcomes were also collected. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 43 years; with even sex distribution (female: 53%) and majority was ERT treated (72%). Patient compliance was high; ≥ 87% completed at least 4 FD-PRO entries each week (mean completion time: < 3 min in week one). Empirical evaluation of item properties via inter-item correlations, exploratory factor analysis and item-response theory models suggested that a total symptom score (TSS) could be calculated. Due to redundancy among items, a "neuropathy parcel" and an "audiovisual parcel" were created in generating the TSS (items within a parcel averaged and treated as a single item). Two items were excluded from TSS: sweating (did not correlate with other items) and difficulty engaging in regular physical activities (measure of impact, not symptoms). Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of the TSS was ≥0.89 across weeks; test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) was ≥0.91. The TSS was correlated with conceptually similar clinical and patient reported assessments as expected (r > |0.4|) and discriminated moderate/severe from least severe FD groups in known-groups validity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The FD-PRO instrument is a novel disease-specific instrument that assesses classic and non-classic symptoms, with strong psychometric properties and appropriate for use in clinical studies.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Celecoxib Oral Solution (ELYXYB) in Acute Treatment of Episodic Migraine with or without Aura.

BACKGROUND: Safe, effective, oral therapies are needed for acute treatment of migraine. This clinical trial assessed the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of celecoxib oral solution (ELYXYB) in a single migraine attack associated with moderate-to-severe pain. METHODS: This was a phase III, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, conducted at 41 US centers from December 2016 to October 2017. Adults with episodic migraine (with or without aura) for ≥1 year were treated with a single 4.8 mL dose of 120-mg celecoxib oral solution or placebo. Co-primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who were pain-free and free from the most bothersome migraine symptom (MBS) at 2 hours post-dose. The MBS was identified at screening from among nausea, photophobia, or phonophobia. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-one patients were randomized (celecoxib oral solution, n=316; placebo, n=315; mean age 41 years, range 18-75; 84.3% female). One study site met prespecified outlier criteria (defined as a treatment effect estimate that was at least twice as large as all other sites) and was excluded from efficacy analyses. This site had a mean 2-hour pain freedom placebo response rate of 75% vs a combined mean of 23.5% for all other sites. In subsequent analysis, 2-hour post-dose pain freedom response rates were significantly higher in the celecoxib oral solution group vs placebo (32.8%, [27.2%, 38.8%]) vs 23.5%, [18.5%, 29.2%]; P=0.020). For 2-hour post-dose MBS freedom, response rates were significantly higher in the celecoxib oral solution group vs placebo (58.1% [51.4%, 64.5%] vs 43.9% [37.2%, 50.7%]; P=0.003). A total of 10.7% (31/289) of patients treated with celecoxib oral solution and 9.9% (28/283) of placebo-treated patients reported a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Study drug-related TEAEs were reported by 7.3% (21/289) and 7.4% (21/283) of celecoxib oral solution and placebo patients, respectively; the most common were nausea (celecoxib oral solution: 1.4% [4/289] vs placebo: 1.8% [5/283]) and dysgeusia (celecoxib oral solution: 1.7% [5/289] vs placebo: 1.1% [3/283]). No serious TEAEs, deaths, or drug-related TEAEs leading to withdrawal were reported. CONCLUSION: Celecoxib oral solution is a safe, effective COX-2-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug for the treatment of acute migraine. In this analysis, celecoxib oral solution was significantly more effective than placebo and was also associated with a low rate of gastric TEAEs. Celecoxib oral solution may provide a convenient, alternate option to currently available treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03009019; registered January 4, 2017; retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03009019.

Acute Treatment of Migraine with Celecoxib Oral Solution: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used for migraine, but gastrointestinal tolerability limits use. We previously reported results from the first treatment period of this 2-period, randomized, controlled study comparing DFN-15-an oral, ready-made liquid solution of a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib-with placebo for the acute treatment of a moderate-severe migraine attack. Herein, we report the effects of treatment for the second treatment period. METHODS: In the first treatment period of this trial, adults with migraine were randomized to double-blind trial treatment of attacks of moderate or severe pain with DFN-15,120 mg or placebo. For the second treatment period, reported herein, participants were re-randomized to treat an attack of any baseline pain intensity (mild, moderate, or severe). Co-primary efficacy endpoints specified for the first attack were not specified for the second attack. RESULTS: Of the 531 patients who completed the first treatment period, 491 (n = 243 DFN-15; n = 248 placebo; 87% female, mean age 41 years) were re-randomized into the second double-blind treatment period. Baseline pain intensity was mild in 17.2% (85/493) of patients, moderate in 58.4% (288/493) of patients, and severe in 22.9% (113/493) of patients. At 2 hours post-dose, DFN-15 was superior to placebo for freedom from pain (46.2% [110/238] vs 31.1% [76/244], p ≤ 0.001) and the most bothersome symptom (63.4% [121/191] vs 50.0% [98/196], p = 0.010). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 7.1% (35/493) of patients (DFN-15: 6.1% [15/244]; placebo 8.0% [20/249]). Study drug-related TEAEs occurred in 5.1% (25/493) of patients (DFN-15: 4.5% [11/244]; placebo 5.6% [14/249]); nausea (1% [5/493]) and dysgeusia (0.8% [4/493]) were most common. No serious TEAEs, severe TEAEs, or TEAEs leading to study drug termination were reported. CONCLUSIONS: DFN-15 was superior to placebo for pain freedom and freedom from the most bothersome symptom when patients treat a migraine attack of any baseline pain intensity. Rates of TEAEs did not differ between treatment groups.