[Daily dialysis: evaluation of the first year of experience at home and in a limited care center]. / La dialisi quotidiana: valutazione del primo anno di esperienza a domicilio ed in un centro ad assistenza limitata.

BACKGROUND: Among self dialysis treatments, daily dialysis is encountering a growing interest. Aim of this study was to evaluate results of the first year of daily dialysis in our Center. METHODS: Since November 1998, twelve patients started daily dialysis. One patient started RRT on daily dialysis; one patient was in training; 8 were on home dialysis, 3 in the limited care center. Selection of patients was performed according to wide acceptance criteria as for age (range 33-61 years), dialysis follow-up (range 1-23 years), comorbidity (=/>1 comorbid factor present in 8). Dialysis schedule consisted of 6 sessions per week (2-3 hours), blood flow 250-320 ml/min, individualized dialysate. Occasional shift to 3-4 times per week were allowed for logistic or working reasons. RESULTS: Results were analyzed taking into account patient satisfaction and main clinical parameters. In 9/12 the choice of treatment resulted from both clinical reasons and patient preferences, while in 3 was due to clinical indications (1/3 dropped out). The main reasons of choice were logistic or research of the best treatment. The most common fears regarded fistula and needle puncturing. Despite the time unconvenience, the rapidly regained well being was the reason for choosing this treatment. Also in this relatively short follow-up the favorable results reported as for weight gain, blood pressure control and metabolic pattern are confirmed. The few side effects were multifactorial (fistula thrombosis after blood pressure normalization, 2 recurrences of atrial fibrillation). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, daily dialysis resulted also in our centre as a promising alternative even in difficult patients.

Daily dialysis Kt/V and flexible schedules: is it possible to control efficiency, when and how?

BACKGROUND: Daily hemodialysis is a promising treatment schedule but uniform criteria for defining efficiency are lacking. METHODS: On our daily dialysis (DD) schedule, duration is flexible (2-3 hours, patients are free to add up to 30 min/session), Qb 250-350 mL/min; dialyser 1.6-1.8 m2. Study was performed on 12 pts on DD for > or = 2 months, with > or = 4 Kt/V on subsequent days, tested in the same laboratory. GOAL: To evaluate variability and identify a simple method for weekly calculation, Kt/V was assessed for 133 sessions. RESULTS: On flexible DD, variability of Kt/V-session is high (relative error 4.9%-22%). On flexible schedules, within the time range chosen (2-3 hours) variability of average hourly Kt/V is lower (standard deviation: min (0.014; max (0.052 hour, relative error 4.9%-10%) allowing calculation of weekly Kt/V (averaging 3 sessions: relative error < 6%) suitable for clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible schedules, allowing patients to increase treatment time, are an interesting clinical option, but a challenge for Kt/V assessment.

Modelling the "ideal" self care--limited care dialysis center.

Limited care dialysis is an interesting option, which has gained attention in several settings because of the aging of the uremic cohort. The aim of this study was to assess its potential in the Piedmont region in northern Italy, evaluating patients' and care-givers' preferences and testing them in a mathematical model of organisation. The study was conducted in the satellite unit of a university hospital (200-210 dialysis patients), following 35 patients (15 at home, 20 in the center, 10 on daily dialysis). Opinions were collected with a questionnaire and features identified were empirically tested through a simulation model. Most patients (34/35) preferred a small unit, with a stable caring team. Further options were flexibility of dialysis schedule, multiple treatment options, integrated center/home care. These needs could be met by a flexible organization including conventional dialysis (3/week) and daily dialysis (6/week). We employed a simulation model (ARENA software) to calculate the nurses required for each shift and the opening hours and best schedule for the unit. Addition of daily dialysis (2-3 hours) to two conventional 4-5 hour sessions to increased the number of patients followed or "spared" beds, ensuring flexibility. According to patients' best choice (7 dialysis stations), and to the recorded calls, the needs are for two nurses per shift, two shifts per day and six nurses for up to 30 patients in limited care. In conclusion, small centers with flexible schedules can tailor dialysis to patients' needs. A managerial approach is valuable for testing cost/benefit ratios in specific contexts.

[The status of peritoneal dialysis in Piedmont by 12/31/1997]. / La situazione della dialisi peritoneale in Piemonte al 31/12/1997.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to examine the situation of chronic uremia substitutive treatment by means of peritoneal dialysis in Piedmont on December 31, 1997 using data from the Piedmont regional dialysis and transplant register. METHODS: Starting from the year 1981, data are reported (absolute, per million population, and according to different patient's anagraphic ages) about peritoneal dialysis prevalence and incidence; about basic nephropathies; drop-out from treatment; patient's rehabilitation; complications incidence, particularly peritonitis; patient's survival compared with survival of patients treated, during the same years with extracorporeal techniques. RESULTS: The data demonstrate, during these years, an increase of peritoneal dialysis incidence and prevalence; patients' survival curves, compared with those of patients treated with extracorporeal techniques, are very similar during the first years of treatment and worse afterwards, but never reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: They support Peritoneal Dialysis as a very good kind of substitutive treatment for some years, but this opinion deserves further examination and investigation on a longer period of time.

Education as a clinical tool for self-dialysis.

Therapeutic compliance and patient education are presently considered crucial parts of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapy. In the center where Italian home and self-care dialysis treatment started, an education program was designed as multi-step pathway--following patients from chronic renal failure to dialysis and eventual graft--employing lessons, booklets, and books. Each step was validated in various subsets of patients. Lessons involved two hours of informal discussion on the main aspects of ESRD and renal replacement therapy (RRT); booklets were created from tape recordings of the lessons. Patient participation was good, with 28 of 33 patients on charge in the center for 6 months or more taking part in more than one lesson in 1999. In 16 of 16 patients who answered a questionnaire after two lessons, expressed opinion was "good" to "fair." All asked for further material. With regard to books, 500 copies of the book What does dialysis mean? were given out in the region; this book was validated in 22 patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 18 on hemodialysis (HD). It helped patients to accept dialysis in 65% of cases and to comprehend it in 90%. Four thousand copies of the book Stories, containing 18 interviews on transplantation, were printed, and this book was validated in 21 patients on self-care and 35 on hospital dialysis (potential candidates for graft). Of 56 patients, 53 asked for further material; 19 changed their initial opinion (10 choose transplantation, despite initial skepticism; 9 put off transplantation, despite initial acceptance). On a local scale, the program led 12 of 18 new patients, who followed at least part of the program, to choose self-dialysis (PD, home, and self-care dialysis).

[Research potential of a regional registry]. / Potenzialità di ricerca di un registro regionale.

BACKGROUND: The need for data bank gathering information in dialysis patients is as old as dialysis. Dialysis Registries presently active are characterized by different policies of data gathering (large vs small number of information) and of use (research vs economical or clinical purposes). Aim of the work was a discussion on the use of a Regional Registry (RPDT, Regional Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation of Piedmont, Italy), gathering since 1981 a wide set of information (about 80 items) on all patients treated in a relatively small area (about 4,300,000 inhabitants). METHODS: Two researches were selected: the first includes patients treated for > or = 20 years by RRT. Cases were identified on the basis of RPDT data and an inquiry regarding all patients was performed, with specific interest on comorbidity. The second includes diabetic patients on regular RRT, a sample of which was further analyzed in high detail. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: While a Regional Registry, even gathering a wide set of data is unable to answer to the most qualitative questions, such as quality of life, its archives are a powerful tool to identify cases. Furthermore, ad hoc inquiries may represent a way to control quality of data or to test new fields to be studied. In the case of patients with long RRT follow-up, comorbidity questions were tested before being included on RPDT. In the case of a sample of diabetic patients, type of diabetes and cause of ESRD were controlled. This biunivocal relationship between clinical work-up and epidemiological archives may often interest future perspectives.

[Epidemiologic analysis of the incidence of new diabetic patients on dialysis as a basis for a clinical study]. / Analisi epidemiologica dell'incidenza dei nuovi ingressi diabetici in dialisi come base per uno studio clinico mirato.

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study is to analyse the incidence of diabetic patients starting dialysis in Piedmont (Italy) during the period 1981-1996 and to evaluate, in a subgroup of patients, the causes of uremia (diabetic nephropathy or other), and the type and seriousness of comorbid factors, in order to define the clinical conditions and try to explain the causes incidence increase. METHODS: Data are taken from the RPDT (Regional Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation of Piedmont). RESULTS: Total incidence of new patients starting dialysis in this Region increased from 65 pmp in 1981-1982 to 116 pmp in 1995-1996 and the mean age increased from 55.4 +/- 15.5 years in 1981-1982 to 61.5 +/- 15.6 in 1995-1996; 49% of patients had at least one of the 13 conditions of comorbidity considered by the Registry (including severe vascular, cardiac, systemic diseases and diabetes). In the same period the incidence of diabetic patients increased from 6 pmp (1981-1982) to 19 for males and 12 pmp for females (1995-1996); this increase is higher for males and limited to patients with age > or = 60 years (for example: group 70-79 years from 7 to 56 pmp). A study performed in a group of 64 patients (52 type 2 and 12 type 1) showed the incidence of multiple comorbid factors: the most important in type 2 are vascular diseases (44/52) and heart diseases (20/52); blindness and amputations are relatively rare (2 each). An important comorbid factor in type 1 diabetes is blindness (3/12) and in this group the most frequent cause of uremia is diabetic nephropathy (DN) (9/12); in the group of type 2 patients nephroangiosclerosis and a clinical picture of progressive renal failure, without nephrotic syndrome, represents 48% of all diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: These results underline the necessity of a strict collaboration with diabetologists and of an improvement of dedicated structures in order to meet the increase of this critical population.

[Cachexia during dialysis]. / Cachessia in corso di dialisi.

In the Italian language, the term cachexia is a rather picturesque synonym of "marasma senile", "senile marasmus", an old definition involving not only old-age, but specifically senility, the end of the ageing process and marasmus, a stagnant and hopeless situation in which all superior organised functions have disappeared. The problem of cachexia during dialysis is complex and several discordant opinions exist at this regard, partly accounted by different definitions of this sluggish entity (or non entity). Actually, the basic question is very simple: is cachexia the cause or the effect of failure of dialysis treatment? The aim of this study was an evaluation of epidemiological data from the Dialysis and Transplantation Registry of Piedmont, a northern Italian Region with about 4,350,000 inhabitants, 22 public dialysis Centers, open acceptance to dialysis since the mid seventies, a multiple choice dialysis system developed in the eighties. In the period 1981-1995, 764 patients died in conditions of cachexia. This figure is 20.9% of all deaths recorded, 27.4% over age 65 and 34.7% over age 75. Despite a likewise significant increase in age and presence of comorbid factors, an improvement of patients survival, that reach statistical significance in the old age group (> or = 65 yrs), was observed.