Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38992191

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In patients with inner ear schwannomas (IES), reports on hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CI) have increased over the past decade, most of which are case reports or small case series. The aim of this study is to systematically review the reported hearing results with CI in patients with IES considering the different audiologic outcome measures used in different countries. METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, a search of published literature was conducted. We included patients with IES (primary or with secondary extension from the internal auditory canal (IAC) to the inner ear, sporadic or NF2 related) undergoing cochlear implantation with or without tumour removal. The audiological results were divided into the categories "monosyllables", "disyllables", "multisyllabic words or numbers", and "sentences". RESULTS: Predefined audiological outcome measures were available from 110 patients and 111 ears in 27 reports. The mean recognition scores for monosyllabic words with CI were 55% (SD: 24), for bisyllabic words 61% (SD: 36), for multisyllabic words and numbers 87% (SD: 25), and 71% (SD: 30) for sentences. Results from for multisyllabic words and numbers in general showed a tendency towards a ceiling effect. Possible risk factors for performance below average were higher complexity tumours (inner ear plus IAC/CPA), NF2, CI without tumour removal ("CI through tumour"), and sequential cochlear implantation after tumour removal (staged surgery). CONCLUSION: Hearing loss in patients with inner ear schwannomas can be successfully rehabilitated with CI with above average speech performance in most cases. Cochlear implantation thus represents a valuable option for hearing rehabilitation also in patients with IES while at the same time maintaining the possibility of MRI follow-up. Further studies should investigate possible risk factors for poor performance. Audiological tests and outcome parameters should be reported in detail and ideally be harmonized to allow better comparison between languages.

2.
J Clin Med ; 13(12)2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38929902

ABSTRACT

Preservation of function is an important goal during surgical management of cochleovestibular schwannomas. We here demonstrate the relief of vertigo and the preservation of function of all five vestibular receptors after removal of an intracochlear schwannoma with extension to the fundus of the internal auditory canal. A 61-year-old male with a five-year history of left-sided deafness, tinnitus, vertigo attacks, and an MRI consistent with an intracochlear schwannoma with limited extension through the modiolus to the fundus of the internal auditory canal (IAC) underwent transcanal, transcochlear total tumor removal and-due to a cerebrospinal fluid leak from the fundus of the IAC-revision surgery with lateral petrosectomy and blind sac closure of the external auditory canal. Despite complete removal of the cochlear partition of the inner ear (total cochlectomy), the patient's vestibular receptors remained functional, and the vertigo symptoms disappeared. These results show that vestibular labyrinthine function may not only be preserved after partial or subtotal cochlectomy but also after complete cochlear removal. This further confirms the vestibular labyrinth's robustness and encourages surgical management of transmodiolar schwannomas with limited extension to the fundus of the IAC.

3.
Audiol Res ; 13(1): 116-129, 2023 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36825950

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since both surgery and more conservative treatments show long-term outcomes in patients with VS, the current challenge in its therapeutic strategy is to offer a cure with lower functional morbidity in terms of facial and hearing preservation or the possibility of hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from 2017 to November 2022. Fifteen articles met our selection criteria: (1) patients with a diagnosis of VS, either sporadic or NF2-related; (2) simultaneous or sequential cochlear implantation; (3) specified audiological test results and follow-up timing. CONCLUSIONS: Although the level of evidence for the presently included studies is low due to either the study design or the lack of treatment consensus, CI rehabilitation is a promising option, especially in small VS with compromised hearing and as a salvage option after a failed attempt at hearing preservation surgery.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...