Educational nurse-led telephone intervention shortly before colonoscopy as a salvage strategy after previous bowel preparation failure: a multicenter randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The most important predictor of unsuccessful bowel preparation is previous failure. For those patients with previous failure, we hypothesized that a nurse-led educational intervention by telephone shortly before the colonoscopy appointment could improve cleansing efficacy. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Consecutive outpatients with previous inadequate bowel preparation were enrolled. Both groups received the same standard bowel preparation protocol. The intervention group also received reinforced education by telephone within 48 hours before the colonoscopy. The primary outcome was effective bowel preparation according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included all randomized patients. Per-protocol analysis included patients who could be contacted by telephone and the control cases. RESULTS: 657 participants were recruited by 11 Spanish hospitals. In the ITT analysis, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in the rate of successful bowel preparation (77.3 % vs. 72 %; P = 0.12). In the intervention group, 267 patients (82.9 %) were contacted by telephone. Per-protocol analysis revealed significantly improved bowel preparation in the intervention group (83.5 % vs. 72.0 %; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among all patients with previous inadequate bowel preparation, nurse-led telephone education did not result in a significant improvement in bowel cleansing. However, in the 83 % of patients who could be contacted, bowel preparation was substantially improved. Phone education may therefore be a useful tool for improving the quality of bowel preparation in those cases.

Caloric intake capacity as measured by a standard nutrient drink test helps to predict weight loss after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Instruments that enable to select individuals that will benefit most from bariatric surgery (BS) are necessary to increase its cost-efficiency. Our goal was to assess if intake capacity, measured with a standardized test, predicts response to BS. METHODS: Patients with criteria for BS were randomly allocated to laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). We measured caloric intake capacity before and 1 year after surgery using a standardized nutrient drink test. We evaluated if pre-surgery satiation could predict satiation and weight loss (%) 1 year after surgery using multiple regression modeling. Descriptive statistics are given as mean ± SD. RESULTS: Fourteen women (48 ± 9 years old, BMI 41 ± 3 kg/m(2)) were evaluated before and 11 ± 2.6 months after surgery (seven LRYGB, seven LSG). Caloric intake capacity diminished after surgery (-950 ± 85 kcal on average [70 ± 8 % decrease over basal intake capacity]; p=0.002) and similarly in both LRYGB (72 ± 7 % decrease) and LSG groups (68 ± 8 % decrease); p=0.5. There was a significant weight reduction after surgery (-32 ± 10 kg [30 ± 8 % of total basal weight]) with a mean post-surgery BMI of 29 ± 2 kg/m(2). The best predictive model of weight loss (%) after surgery (R (2)=89 %, p=0.0009) included: BMI (p=0.0004), surgery type (p=0.01) and pre-surgery intake capacity (p=0.006). Weight loss was higher in heavier patients and those undergoing LRYGB. Patients with higher intake capacity had a poorer outcome independently of basal BMI and surgery type. CONCLUSIONS: Caloric intake capacity, as measured by a standard nutrient drink test, helps to predict weight loss after bariatric surgery. This test might be useful in algorithms of obesity treatment decision.