Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Osteoporos Int ; 19(9): 1315-22, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18425402

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: In this clinical trial of 12.5 or 25 mg/day of hydrochlorothiazide, the urine calcium showed significant decreases from placebo in men at one year, but the effects had waned by 3 years. Serum bicarbonate was consistently greater in the thiazide than in the placebo groups throughout the three years. These effects could be beneficial to the skeleton. INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have shown increased bone density and reduced risk of fracture in patients taking thiazide diuretics. The long-term effects of low-dose thiazides on mineral metabolism have not been reported in normal subjects. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded trial in normals aged 60-79 years, using hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 or 25 mg/d or placebo for three years. Subjects were encouraged to maintain calcium intake of 1,000 to 1,500 mg/day. Measurements of serum and urine calcium metabolism were done at baseline, six months, and yearly. Data were analyzed in 88 men and 177 women who had taken study medication. Adjusted change in the measurements from baseline to one and three years were compared among groups. RESULTS: The calcium intake increased in all groups. Urine calcium per day was significantly lower in thiazide than placebo groups in men at one year but not at three years; in women the changes were not significantly different. Serum bicarbonate was higher in thiazide compared to placebo groups at one and three years. No changes were seen in serum calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, sodium or magnesium. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that both increased calcium availability from a hypocalciuric effect and reduction in acid-induced bone buffering could be mechanisms for the beneficial skeletal effects.


Subject(s)
Bone Density/drug effects , Bone and Bones/metabolism , Hydrochlorothiazide/pharmacology , Minerals/metabolism , Aged , Bicarbonates/blood , Bone Density/physiology , Bone Resorption/prevention & control , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Calcium/urine , Calcium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Hydrochlorothiazide/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors
2.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 86(1): 179-85, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11231998

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare biochemical markers of bone resorption and formation in young women using different hormonal contraceptive methods. Women aged 18-39 yr who were using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) contraception were recruited for the study; comparison women were matched by age and clinic location. There were 116 women using DMPA, 39 using oral contraceptives containing estrogen and progestin, and 72 not currently using hormonal contraceptives. Biochemical measurements were serum calcium, PTH and osteocalcin, and urine N-telopeptide. Bone density was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The N-telopeptide levels, adjusted for age and other risk factors, were 42.4 +/- 2.3 nmol/mmol creatinine in the DMPA group, 26.2 +/- 3.3 nmol/mmol in the oral contraceptive group, and 35.4 +/- 2.9 nmol/mmol in the nonusers; significant differences were seen in all pairwise comparisons. Osteocalcin levels showed the same pattern, although the difference between the DMPA users and nonusers was not statistically significant. There were no differences among groups in the PTH levels. The bone density at the spine was 1.086 +/- 0.085 g/cm(2) in the DMPA group, 1.103 +/- 0.095 g/cm(2) in the oral contraceptive group, and 1.093 +/- 0.090 g/cm(2) in nonusers (P = 0.051). The results suggest that in women using DMPA bone resorption exceeded bone formation.


Subject(s)
Bone and Bones/metabolism , Contraceptive Agents, Female/pharmacology , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/pharmacology , Adult , Biomarkers , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Resorption/metabolism , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Contraceptive Agents, Female/adverse effects , Contraceptives, Oral/pharmacology , Delayed-Action Preparations , Estrogens/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/adverse effects , Osteocalcin/blood , Osteogenesis/drug effects , Premenopause/metabolism , Progestins/pharmacology
3.
Obstet Gynecol ; 93(2): 233-8, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9932562

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable contraception on bone mineral density in reproductive-age women. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional comparison of bone mineral density levels in women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception and in women of similar age not using this method. The study recruited 457 nonpregnant women aged 18-39 years who were enrollees of a Washington state health maintenance organization. One hundred eighty-three women were receiving injections and 274 were not. Bone mineral density at several anatomic sites (spine, femoral neck, greater trochanter, and whole body) was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Data on other factors potentially related to bone density were collected through questionnaire and examination. RESULTS: Overall, age-adjusted mean bone density levels were lower for users of this method than for nonusers at all anatomic sites: The mean difference was 2.5% for the spine (P = .03) and 2.2% for the femoral neck (P = .12). Exposure to depot medroxyprogesterone acetate continued to be significantly (P < .01) associated with decreased bone density at the femoral neck, spine, and trochanter after multivariate adjustment for other risk factors related to bone density. Age-specific comparisons indicated that the major differences in bone density between users and nonusers occurred in the youngest age group (women 18-21 years); the mean femoral neck bone density was 10.5% lower (P < .01) for the exposed women, and differences were consistent (P < .01) across all anatomic sites. We also noted a significant dose-response relation between longer use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and decreased bone density levels in this age group (P < .01 for all sites). CONCLUSION: These results provide evidence that contraception with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, particularly long-term use, may adversely affect bone mineral density levels in young women aged 18-21 years. The implications for future bone health need further study.


Subject(s)
Bone Density/drug effects , Contraceptive Agents, Female/pharmacology , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/pharmacology , Absorptiometry, Photon , Adolescent , Adult , Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Contraceptive Agents, Female/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delayed-Action Preparations , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/administration & dosage , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/adverse effects , Spine/diagnostic imaging
4.
Obstet Gynecol ; 91(6): 993-7, 1998 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9611011

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between vaginal douching and cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection. METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional data from a study conducted at Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, a nonprofit health maintenance organization in western Washington state. Participants were nonpregnant women Group Health enrollees between the ages of 18 and 34 years who were attending two primary care clinics either for nonurgent visits, primarily routine preventive health visits, or in response to an invitation from the study. Before the clinical examination, all completed a self-administered survey assessing demographic and behavioral characteristics, including the timing, frequency, products used, and reasons for douching. Chlamydial infection was ascertained via cell culture isolation of C trachomatis from endocervical specimens obtained at the same visit. RESULTS: Chlamydia trachomatis was isolated from cervical cultures in 58 (3.4%) of 1692 study participants. Women who reported douching in the 12 months before their clinic visit had an increased likelihood of chlamydial infection compared with women who did not douche (prevalence odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22, 4.30, after adjusting for confounding factors). The likelihood was higher for women who reported douching more often: OR 2.60 (95% CI 1.29, 5.24) for women who douched one to three times per month, and OR 3.84 (95% CI 1.26, 11.70) for those douching four times or more per month. These associations were slightly stronger when women who reported douching because of an infection were excluded from the analysis. CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that vaginal douching predisposes to acquisition of cervical chlamydial infection and are compatible with previous studies that report associations between douching and sequelae of chlamydial infection, including pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia trachomatis , Therapeutic Irrigation/adverse effects , Uterine Cervical Diseases/microbiology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Chlamydia Infections/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Risk Factors , Uterine Cervical Diseases/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Diseases/etiology , Vagina
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...