Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Health Econ ; 33(6): 1229-1240, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38379204

ABSTRACT

Economists originally developed methods to assess financial catastrophe using total or aggregate out-of-pocket health spending. Aggregate out-of-pocket health spending is financially catastrophic when it exceeds a fixed proportion (i.e., threshold) of a household's total income or expenditure in a given period. However, these methods are now applied to assess financial catastrophe in disease- or service-specific rather than aggregate out-of-pocket health spending without using disease- or service-specific thresholds. This paper argues that not using disease- or service-specific thresholds for such assessments is misleading and underestimates the burden of financial catastrophe, especially among households from poorer backgrounds. It then proposed disease- or service-specific catastrophic payment thresholds, applied them to Nigeria and found that financial catastrophe was underestimated for the five service groups considered. The paper stresses the importance of using disease- or service-specific thresholds and avoiding unadjusted thresholds, which may leave poorer households behind as financially protected.


Subject(s)
Financing, Personal , Health Expenditures , Humans , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Nigeria , Catastrophic Illness/economics
2.
Heliyon ; 6(7): e04356, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32743086

ABSTRACT

Climate change has been significantly affecting smallholder farmer's livelihood and food security. However, efforts to support farmer adaptation are hampered by the lack of scientific and context based evidences. Hence, this paper identified the major adaptation strategies to climate change (CC) and analysed the determinants of adoption of adaptation strategies to climate change in Eastern Tigray Region of Ethiopia. Three-stage sampling technique was used to select the study sites and sample households. Copies of 485 questionnaires were administered and complemented with data from focus group discussion and key informant interviews. Results of the descriptive analysis identified that use of soil and water conservation practices, planting trees, improved crop seeds, irrigation and use of non-farm income generating activities are the most utilized adaptation strategies to climate change. Results of the multinomial logistic regression (MNL) revealed that households' adaptation to climate change was found positively and significantly affected by education, livestock holding, cooperatives membership, extension services, farmers income and households perception to climate change. On the contrary, age of the household head, distance to market and agro-ecology were found negatively and statistically affecting smallholder farmers adoption of adaptation strategies to climate change. Thus, public policy on climate change adaptation need to take into account local people's resource base and their lifelong outlooks so as to reduce the potential drawbacks of climate change on farmers' livelihood.

3.
Int J Health Policy Manag ; 9(7): 286-296, 2020 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32613800

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Corruption is widespread in Nigeria's health sector but the reasons why it exists and persists are poorly understood and it is often seen as intractable. We describe a consensus building exercise in which we asked health workers and policy-makers to identify and prioritise feasible responses to corruption in the Nigerian health sector. METHODS: We employed three sequential activities. First, a narrative literature review identified which types of corruption are reported in the Nigerian health system. Second, we asked 21 frontline health workers to add to what was found in the review (based on their own experiences) and prioritise them, based on their significance and the feasibility of assessing them, by means of a consensus building exercise using a Nominal Group Technique (NGT). Third, we presented their assessments in a meeting of 25 policy-makers to offer their views on the practicality of implementing appropriate measures. RESULTS: Participants identified 49 corrupt practices from the literature review and their own experience as most important in the Nigerian health system. The NGT prioritised: absenteeism, procurement-related corruption, under-the-counter payments, health financing-related corruption, and employment-related corruption. This largely reflected findings from the literature review, except for the greater emphasis on employment-related corruption from the NGT. Absenteeism, Informal payments and employment-related corruption were seen as most feasible to tackle. Frontline workers and policy-makers agreed that tackling corrupt practices requires a range of approaches. CONCLUSION: Corruption is recognized in Nigeria as widespread but often seems insurmountable. We show how a structured approach can achieve consensus among multiple stakeholders, a crucial first step in mobilizing action to address corruption.


Subject(s)
Government Programs , Consensus , Health Workforce , Healthcare Financing , Humans , Nigeria
4.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 18(6): 747-757, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31628664

ABSTRACT

Equity in health financing remains significant in the universal health coverage discourse. The way a health system is financed, apart from determining whether people have access to needed health services, also has implications for income inequality in a country. Traditionally, the impact of health financing on income inequality or the redistributive effect of health financing is assessed by looking at whether income inequality reduces because of health financing. This is also decomposed into a vertical component (the extent of progressivity), a horizontal component (the extent to which households with similar incomes are treated equally when financing health services) and a reranking component (whether households change their relative socio-economic ranking after financing health services). Such an approach to decomposition is mainly essential to assess the equal treatment of equals and unequal treatment of unequals in the entire population. This paper argues that in decomposing the redistributive effect of health financing, the impact of health financing on changes in income inequality between and within population groups should be investigated as they are relevant for policy dialogues in many countries. It develops a framework for such analysis and applies this to data from Nigeria. Decomposing the Gini index of income inequality using the Shapley value approach, the results show that changes in inequality associated with out-of-pocket payments for health services within the geopolitical zones in Nigeria dominate the changes in income inequality between the geopolitical zones. Although not all the results in the application in this paper are statistically significant, this framework is still useful for policies in countries that aim to use health financing to reduce, among other things, income disparities between and within defined population groups.


Subject(s)
Health Expenditures , Healthcare Financing , Humans , Income , Nigeria , Universal Health Insurance
5.
Afr J Reprod Health ; 23(3): 57-67, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31782632

ABSTRACT

The health system in many parts of Nigeria has been dysfunctional in several domains including financing, human resources, infrastructure, health management information system and hospital services. In an attempt to scale up Maternal and Child Health (MCH) services and ensure efficiency, Ebonyi State Government in Southeast Nigeria provided funding to mission hospitals across the State as a grant. This study used nonparametric method to assess the effect of this public financing on the efficiency of the mission hospitals. Operational cost and number of hospital beds were used as the input variables, while antenatal registrations, number of immunization doses and hospital deliveries were the output variables. The hospitals were disaggregated into 15 hospital-years. The mean overall technical efficiency of the mission hospitals was 84.05 22.45%. The mean pure technical efficiency was 95.56±6.9% and the scale efficiency was 88.05±22.20%. About 46.67% of all the hospital-years were technically and scale efficient. Although, 55.33% were generally inefficient, only 33.33% of hospital-years exhibited pure technical inefficiency. Low immunization coverage was the major cause of inefficiency. The study showed increased maternal health service output as result of public funding or intervention; however, the mission hospitals could have saved 16% of input resources if they had performed efficiently. It also shows that data envelopment analysis can be used in setting targets/benchmarks for relatively inefficient health facilities, and in monitoring impact of interventions on efficiency of hospitals over-time.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Efficiency, Organizational , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Religious/organization & administration , Maternal Health Services/organization & administration , Child , Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Costs and Cost Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Female , Financing, Government , Hospitals, Religious/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Nigeria , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
6.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 661, 2019 Sep 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31519181

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Various attempts to examine health financing mechanisms in Nigeria highlight the fact that there is no single mechanism that fits all contexts and people. This paper sets out findings of an in-depth assessment of different health financing mechanisms in Nigeria. METHODS: The study was undertaken in the Federal Capital territory of Nigeria and two States (Niger and Kaduna). Data were collected through review of government documents, and in-depth interviews of purposively selected respondents. Data analysis was guided by a conceptual framework which draws from various approaches for assessing health financing mechanisms. Data was examined for current practices, what needs to change and how the change can happen. RESULTS: Health financing mechanisms in Nigeria do not operate optimally. Allocation and use of resources are neither evidence-based nor results-driven. Resources are not allocated equitably or in a manner that minimizes wastage and improves efficiency. None of the mechanisms effectively protects individuals/households from catastrophic health expenditure. Issues with social health insurance cut across legal frameworks and use of Health Maintenance Organisations (HMOs) as purchasers. The concomitant effect is that attainment of Universal Health Coverage is greatly compromised. In order to improve efficiency of health financing mechanisms, government needs to allocate more funds for purchasing health services; this spending must be based on evidence (strategic), and appropriately tracked. The legislation that established National Health Insurance Scheme should be amended such that social health insurance becomes mandatory for all citizens. Implementation of the latter should be complemented by revision of benefit package, strict oversight and regulation of HMOs. CONCLUSION: In order to improve health financing in the country, legal and regulatory frameworks need to be revised. Efficient utilization of resources could be improved through strategic purchasing arrangements and strict oversight.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Healthcare Financing , Insurance, Health/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Health Maintenance Organizations , Health Services/economics , Humans , Insurance, Health/economics , Nigeria , Universal Health Insurance
7.
Health Policy Plan ; 34(7): 529-543, 2019 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31377775

ABSTRACT

West African countries are ranked especially low in global corruption perception indexes. The health sector is often singled out for particular concern given the role of corruption in hampering access to, and utilization of health services, representing a major barrier to progress to universal health coverage and to achieving the health-related Sustainable Development Goals. The first step in tackling corruption systematically is to understand its scale and nature. We present a systematic review of literature that explores corruption involving front-line healthcare providers, their managers and other stakeholders in health sectors in the five Anglophone West African (AWA) countries: Gambia, Ghana, Liberia, Nigeria and Sierra Leone, identifying motivators and drivers of corrupt practices and interventions that have been adopted or proposed. Boolean operators were adopted to optimize search outputs and identify relevant studies. Both grey and published literature were identified from Research Gate, Yahoo, Google Scholar, Google and PubMed, and reviewed and synthesized around key domains, with 61 publications meeting our inclusion criteria. The top five most prevalent/frequently reported corrupt practices were (1) absenteeism; (2) diversion of patients to private facilities; (3) inappropriate procurement; (4) informal payments; and (5) theft of drugs and supplies. Incentives for corrupt practices and other manifestations of corruption in the AWA health sector were also highlighted, while poor working conditions and low wages fuel malpractice. Primary research on anti-corruption strategies in health sectors in AWA remains scarce, with recommendations to curb corrupt practices often drawn from personal views and experience rather that of rigorous studies. We argue that a nuanced understanding of all types of corruption and their impacts is an important precondition to designing viable contextually appropriate anti-corruption strategies. It is a particular challenge to identify and tackle corruption in settings where formal rules are fluid or insufficiently enforced.


Subject(s)
Fraud/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Sector/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Absenteeism , Africa, Western , Fraud/economics , Health Care Sector/economics , Health Care Sector/ethics , Health Personnel/economics , Humans , Theft/statistics & numerical data
8.
Article in English | AIM (Africa) | ID: biblio-1258541

ABSTRACT

The health system in many parts of Nigeria has been dysfunctional in several domains including financing, human resources, infrastructure, health management information system and hospital services. In an attempt to scale up Maternal and Child Health (MCH) services and ensure efficiency, Ebonyi State Government in Southeast Nigeria provided funding to mission hospitalsacross the State as a grant. This study used nonparametric method to assess the effect of this public financing on the efficiency of the mission hospitals. Operational cost and number of hospital beds were used as the input variables, while antenatal registrations, number of immunization doses and hospital deliveries were the output variables. The hospitals were disaggregated into 15 hospital-years. The mean overall technical efficiency of the mission hospitals was 84.05 22.45%. The mean pure technical efficiency was 95.56±6.9% and the scale efficiency was 88.05±22.20%. About 46.67% of all the hospital-years were technically and scale efficient. Although, 55.33% were generally inefficient, only 33.33% of hospital-years exhibited pure technical inefficiency. Low immunization coverage was the major cause of inefficiency. The study showed increased maternal health service output as result of public funding or intervention; however, the mission hospitals could have saved 16% of input resources if they had performed efficiently. It also shows that data envelopment analysis can be used in setting targets/benchmarks for relatively inefficient health facilities, and in monitoring impact of interventions on efficiency of hospitals over-time


Subject(s)
Child , Delivery of Health Care , Delivery, Obstetric , Nigeria , Schools, Nursery
9.
Front Public Health ; 6: 200, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30083533

ABSTRACT

Background: A special health fund was established in Nigeria in 2014 and is known as the Basic Health Care Provision Fund (BHCPF). The fund is equivalent to at least 1% of the Consolidated Revenue of the Federation. The BHCPF will provide additional revenue to fund primary healthcare services and help Nigeria to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). This fund is to be matched with counterpart funds from states and local government areas (LGAs), and is expected to provide at least a basic benefit health package that will cover maternal and child health (MCH) services for pregnant women and under-five children. Objective: To determine the financial feasibility of using the BHCPF to provide a minimum benefit package to cover all pregnant women and under-five children in Nigeria. Methods: The study focused on three states in Nigeria: Imo, Kaduna, and Niger. The feasibility analysis was performed using 3 scenarios but the main analysis was Scenario 1, which was based on the funding of drugs and consumables only. All the costs and revenues were in 2015 levels. The standard costs of a minimum benefit package for the different states were multiplied by the number of target beneficiaries to determine the amount required for the year. Financial feasibility is determined by the excess or otherwise of revenue over costs. Findings: It was found that in the best case funding scenario of using 95% of the CRF with 25% counterpart funding from states and LGAs, the entire available funds were not adequate to cover the benefit package for all the pregnant women and under-five children in the three states. The funds were also inadequate to cover the target beneficiaries that live below the poverty line in two of the states. Conclusion: The BHCPF is a good step toward providing essential MCH services, but the current level of funding will not assure UHC for all the target beneficiaries. However, the available funds should be used immediately to target priority mothers and children such as vulnerable groups, whilst sourcing for additional funds to ensure universal coverage of MCH services.

10.
Glob Health Action ; 11(1): 1461338, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29768107

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The global focus on promoting Universal Health Coverage has drawn attention to the need to increase public domestic funding for health care in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVES: This article examines whether increased tax revenue in the three territories of Kenya, Lagos State (Nigeria) and South Africa was accompanied by improved resource allocation to their public health sectors, and explores the reasons underlying the observed trends. METHODS: Three case studies were conducted by different research teams using a common mixed methods approach. Quantitative data were extracted from official government financial reports and used to describe trends in general tax revenue, total government expenditure and government spending on the health sector and other sectors in the first decade of this century. Twenty-seven key informant interviews with officials in Ministries of Health and Finance were used to explore the contextual factors, actors and processes accounting for the observed trends. A thematic content analysis allowed this qualitative information to be compared and contrasted between territories. FINDINGS: Increased tax revenue led to absolute increases in public health spending in all three territories, but not necessarily in real per capita terms. However, in each of the territories, the percentage of the government budget allocated to health declined for much of the period under review. Factors contributing to this trend include: inter-sectoral competition in priority setting; the extent of fiscal federalism; the Ministry of Finance's perception of the health sector's absorptive capacity; weak investment cases made by the Ministry of Health; and weak parliamentary and civil society involvement. CONCLUSION: Despite dramatic improvements in tax revenue collection, fiscal space for health in the three territories did not improve. Ministries of Health must strengthen their ability to motivate for larger allocations from government revenue through demonstrating improved performance and the relative benefits of health investments.


Subject(s)
Developing Countries/economics , Health Care Rationing/organization & administration , Health Care Sector/organization & administration , Public Sector/organization & administration , Taxes/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Rationing/economics , Health Care Sector/economics , Health Expenditures/trends , Humans , Kenya , Nigeria , Public Sector/economics , South Africa
11.
Health Policy Plan ; 31(9): 1212-24, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27208896

ABSTRACT

Globally, in 2013 over 6 million children younger than 5 years died from either an infectious cause or during the neonatal period. A large proportion of these deaths occurred in developing countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Immunization is one way to reduce childhood morbidity and deaths. In Nigeria, however, although immunization is provided without a charge at public facilities, coverage remains low and deaths from vaccine preventable diseases are high. This article seeks to assess inequalities in full and partial immunization coverage in Nigeria. It also assesses inequality in the 'intensity' of immunization coverage and it explains the factors that account for disparities in child immunization coverage in the country. Using nationally representative data, this article shows that disparities exist in the coverage of immunization to the advantage of the rich. Also, factors such as mother's literacy, region and location of the child, and socio-economic status explain the disparities in immunization coverage in Nigeria. Apart from addressing these issues, the article notes the importance of addressing other social determinants of health to reduce the disparities in immunization coverage in the country. These should be in line with the social values of communities so as to ensure acceptability and compliance. We argue that any policy that addresses these issues will likely reduce disparities in immunization coverage and put Nigeria on the road to sustainable development.


Subject(s)
Immunization/statistics & numerical data , Population Surveillance/methods , Socioeconomic Factors , Child Mortality , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Mothers , Nigeria , Residence Characteristics , Rural Population , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urban Population , Vaccines/supply & distribution
12.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 29(2): e174-85, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23390079

ABSTRACT

The study examined the burden of out-of-pocket spending (OOPS) to households, because available data showed that OOPS dominates household expenditure on health in Nigeria. The study took place in rural and urban districts in Nigeria. A household questionnaire was used to collect data from 4873 households on their healthcare expenditures and payment mechanisms by using a 1-month expenditure recall period. Financing incidence analysis was assessed at the household level on the basis of socio-economic status (SES) groups and rural-urban location of the households. Concentration curves of OOPS were plotted with the Lorenz curve of total household expenditures to show the distribution of the burden of OOPS by SES compared with total household expenditure. The Kakwani index was computed to examine the overall progressivity or regressivity of OOPS. There was lack of financial risk protection for healthcare in the study area. The results showed that 3150 (98.8%) of payments were made using OOPS, nine (0.3%) using reimbursement by employers, one (0.03%) through private voluntary health insurance (PVHI), nine (0.3%) using instalment and 14 (0.44%) through 'others'. The average monthly household OOPS was 2219.1 Naira. The Kakwani index for financing incidence of OOPS was -0.18, showing that OOPS was regressive. The most-poor SES groups and rural dwellers experienced the highest burden of health expenditure. Urgent steps should be taken by the government to increase or enhance universal coverage in the country with financial protection mechanisms such as the National Health Insurance Scheme in addition to possibly abolishing some of the user fees that cause high incidence and burden of OOPS.


Subject(s)
Financing, Personal/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Income/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Nigeria , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data
13.
Int J Health Serv ; 43(4): 745-59, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24397237

ABSTRACT

There is a growing interest in health policy in the social determinants of health. This has increased the demand for a paradigm shift within the discipline of health economics from health care economics to health economics. While the former involves what is essentially a medical model that emphasizes the maximization of individual health outcomes and considers the social organization of the health system as merely instrumental, the latter emphasizes that health and its distribution result from political, social, economic, and cultural structures. The discipline of health economics needs to refocus its energy on the social determinants of health but, in doing so, must dig deeper into the reasons for structurally embedded inequalities that give rise to inequalities in health outcomes. Especially is this the case in Africa and other low- and middle-income regions. This article seeks to provide empirical evidence from sub-Saharan Africa, including Ghana and Nigeria, on why such inequalities exist, arguing that these are in large part a product of hangovers from historically entrenched institutions. It argues that there is a need for research in health economics to embrace the social determinants of health, especially inequality, and to move away from its current mono-cultural focus.


Subject(s)
Child Mortality/trends , Health Status Disparities , Social Determinants of Health , Africa South of the Sahara , Child , Developmental Disabilities/economics , Humans , Social Class
14.
J Ment Health Policy Econ ; 15(3): 139-48, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23001282

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Information on the cost of mental health services in Africa is very limited even though mental health disorders represent a significant public health concern, in terms of health and economic impact. Cost analysis is important for planning and for efficiency in the provision of hospital services. STUDY AIM: The study estimated the total and unit costs of psychiatric hospital services to guide policy and psychiatric hospital management efficiency in Nigeria. METHODS: The study was exploratory and analytical, examining 2008 data. A standard costing methodology based on ingredient approach was adopted combining top-down method with step-down approach to allocate resources (overhead and indirect costs) to the final cost centers. Total and unit cost items related to the treatment of psychiatric patients (including the costs of personnel, overhead and annualised costs of capital items) were identified and measured on the basis of outpatients' visits, inpatients' days and inpatients' admissions. The exercise reflected the input-output process of hospital services where inputs were measured in terms of resource utilisation and output measured by activities carried out at both the outpatient and inpatient departments. In the estimation process total costs were calculated at every cost center/department and divided by a measure of corresponding patient output to produce the average cost per output. This followed a stepwise process of first allocating the direct costs of overhead to the intermediate and final cost centers and from intermediate cost centers to final cost centers for the calculation of total and unit costs. Costs were calculated from the perspective of the healthcare facility, and converted to the US Dollars at the 2008 exchange rate. RESULTS: Personnel constituted the greatest resource input in all departments, averaging 80% of total hospital cost, reflecting the mix of capital and recurrent inputs. Cost per inpatient day, at $56 was equivalent to 1.4 times the cost per outpatient visit at $41, while cost per emergency visit was about two times the cost per outpatient visit. The cost of one psychiatric inpatient admission averaged $3,675, including the costs of drugs and laboratory services, which was equivalent to the cost of 90 outpatients' visits. Cost of drugs was about 4.4% of the total costs and each prescription averaged $7.48. The male ward was the most expensive cost center. Levels of subsidization for inpatient services were over 90% while ancillary services were not subsidized hence full cost recovery. CONCLUSION: The hospital costs were driven by personnel which reflected the mix of inputs that relied most on technical manpower. The unit cost estimates are significantly higher than the upper limit range for low income countries based on the WHO-CHOICE estimates. Findings suggest a scope for improving efficiency of resource use given the high proportion of fixed costs which indicates excess capacity. Adequate research is needed for effective comparisons and valid assessment of efficiency in psychiatric hospital services in Africa. The unit cost estimates will be useful in making projections for total psychiatric hospital package and a basis for determining the cost of specific neuropsychiatric cases.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Psychiatric/economics , Hospitals, Public/economics , Mental Health Services/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Policy , Humans , Male , Models, Economic , Nigeria
15.
Trop Med Int Health ; 15(1): 18-25, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19891758

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the inequities in the household income depletion resulting from malaria treatment expenditures, the sacrifice of basic household needs (catastrophe) and the differences in payment strategies among different socio-economic and geographic groups in southeast Nigeria. METHODS: Data were gathered through pre-tested, structured questionnaires from a random sample of 2 250 householders in rural and urban parts of southeast Nigeria. The level of catastrophic malaria treatment expenditure was computed as the percentage of average monthly malaria treatment expenditure divided by the average monthly non-food household expenditure, using a threshold of 5%. Socio-economic inequity was established using a socio-economic status (SES) index, while a rural-urban comparison examined geographic disparities. RESULTS: The average cost to treat a case of malaria was 796.5 Naira ($6.64) for adults and 789.0 Naira ($6.58) for children. The monthly malaria treatment expenditure as a proportion of monthly household non-food expenditure was 7.8%, 8.5%, 5.5% and 3.9% for the most poor, very poor, poor and least poor SES groups respectively. Malaria treatment accounted for 7.1% and 5.0% of non-food expenditures for rural and urban dwellers, respectively. More than 95% of the people financed their treatment through out-of-pocket payment (OOP), with no SES and rural-urban variance, as opposed to insurance payment mechanisms and fee exemptions. CONCLUSION: There were socio-economic and geographic inequities in the financial burden resulting from malaria treatment. The treatment expenditure depleted more of the aggregate income of the two worse-off SES (Q1 and Q2) and of the rural dwellers. Government and donor agencies should institute the abolition of user fees for malaria, the transition from OOP to pre-payment mechanisms and the improvement of physical access to appropriate malaria treatment services, as well as subsidies and deferrals in order to engender financial risk protection from malaria treatment.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Developing Countries , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Malaria/economics , Adult , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Female , Financing, Personal/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Malaria/therapy , Male , Nigeria , Rural Health/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Health/statistics & numerical data
16.
Health Policy ; 90(2-3): 223-9, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19036466

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the extent to which costs of subsidized antiretrovirals treatment (ART) programmes are catastrophic and the benefit incidence that accrues to different population groups. METHODS: Data on expenditures to patients for receiving treatment from a government subsidized ART clinic was collected using a questionnaire. The patient costs excluded time and other indirect costs. Catastrophic cost was determined as the percentage of total expenditure on ART treatment as a proportion of household non-food expenditures on essential items. RESULTS: On average, patients spent 990 Naira (US$ 8.3) on antiretroviral (ARV) drugs per month. They also spent an average of $8.2 on other drugs per month. However, people that bought ARV drugs from elsewhere other than the ART clinic spent an average of $88.8 per month. Patients spent an average of $95.1 on laboratory tests per month. Subsidized ARV drugs depleted 9.8% of total household expenditure, other drugs (e.g. for opportunistic infections) depleted 9.7%, ARV drugs from elsewhere depleted 105%, investigations depleted 112.9% and total expenditure depleted 243.2%. The level of catastrophe was generally more with females, rural dwellers and most poor patients. Females and urbanites had more benefit incidence than males and rural dwellers. CONCLUSION: Subsidized ART programme lowers the cost of ARV drugs but other major costs are still incurred, which make the overall cost of accessing and consuming ART treatment to be excessive and catastrophic. The costs of laboratory tests and other drugs should be subsidized and there should also be targeting of ART programme to ensure that more rural dwellers and the most-poor people have increased benefit incidence.


Subject(s)
Anti-Retroviral Agents/economics , Financing, Government , Government Programs/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Social Class , Ambulatory Care Facilities/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Costs , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Nigeria , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...