Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with inborn errors of immunity.

Graft failure (GF) remains a serious issue of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in inborn errors of immunity (IEI). Second HSCT is the only salvage therapy for GF. There are no uniform strategies for the second HSCTs and limited data are available on the second HSCT outcomes. 48 patients with various IEI received second allogeneic HSCT from 2013 to 2020. Different conditioning regimens were used, divided into two main groups: containing myeloablative doses of busulfan/treosulfan (n = 19) and lymphoid irradiation 2-6 Gy (n = 22). Irradiation-containing conditioning was predominantly used in suspected immune-mediated rejection of the first graft. Matched unrelated donor was used in 28 patients, mismatched related in 18, and matched related in 1. 35 patients received TCRαß/CD19 graft depletion. The median follow-up time was 2.4 years post-HSCT. One patient died at conditioning. The OS was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.41-0.85) after busulfan/treosulfan and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.48-0.88) after irradiation-based conditioning, p = 0.66. Active infection at HSCT significantly influenced OS: 0.43 (95% CI: 0.17-0.69) versus 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.88) without infection, p = 0.004. The cumulative incidence of GF was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08-0.29). To conclude, an individualized approach is required for the second HSCT in IEI. Low-dose lymphoid irradiation in suspected immune-mediated GF may be a feasible option.

Post-Transplantation Immunosuppression After TCRΑß/CD19 Graft Depletion Does Not Improve HSCT Outcomes in Primary Immunodeficiency.

We recently demonstrated that TCRαß+/CD19+ graft depletion successfully prevents severe acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID) receiving transplants from both matched unrelated and mismatched related donors. However, in all patients, short-term post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) immunosuppressive therapy (IST) was used. There are limited data on TCRαß+/CD19+ graft depletion with no post-HSCT IST implementation. In the current study 74 PID patients who underwent first HSCT from matched unrelated (n=51) or mismatched related donors (n=23) with TCRαß+/CD19+ graft depletion were included. All received as a conditioning regimen a combination of treosulfan with fludarabine and either melphalan or thiotepa. In all, thymoglobulin 5 mg/kg (days -5, -4, -3) and rituximab at day -1 were used. In 48 patients, various approaches to short-term post-transplantation IST were used, and 26 patients received no post-HSCT IST. The rates of engraftment, acute and chronic GVHD, survival, and mortality were similar in those who received and did not receive IST, with a slightly higher incidence of graft rejection in patients not receiving IST: 19% in the non-IST group against 13% in the IST group (P = .41). The incidence of cytomegalovirus reactivation was 50% and 39% (P = .50) and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation 10% and 0 (P = .20) in the IST and non-IST groups, respectively. No grade 4 adverse events were seen in both groups, although in 19 of 40 (47.5%) patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors, the therapy was discontinued before day 45. More robust immune recovery with both T- and B-lymphocytes was observed in the non-IST group. To conclude, TCRαß+/CD19+ in combination with particular serotherapy effectively prevents severe acute and chronic GVHD in PID. Regarding remaining risks of infectious complications and additional drug-related toxicity, there are no benefits to post-HSCT IST use in these patients.