Clinical efficacy of blood purification using a polymethylmethacrylate hemofilter for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is a systemic inflammatory disease, and it can often complicate into acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of blood purification using a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) hemofilter. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 54 patients, who were diagnosed with SAP according to the Japanese criteria from January 2011 to December 2019. RESULTS: Of a total of 54 SAP patients, 26 patients progressively developed AKI and required continuous hemodialysis with a PMMA membrane hemofilter (PMMA-CHD). Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were significantly higher in patients requiring PMMA-CHD than in patients not requiring hemodialysis. The lung injury scores were also significantly higher in patients requiring PMMA-CHD. Of the 26 patients, 16 patients developed ALI/ARDS and required mechanical ventilation. A total of seven patients developed severe ALI/ARDS and received additional intermittent hemodiafiltration using a PMMA hemofilter (PMMA-HDF). Although the length of intensive care unit stay was significantly longer in patients with severe ALI/ARDS, blood purification therapy was discontinued in all the patients. The survival rates at the time of discharge were 92.3% and 92.9% in patients with and without PMMA-CHD, respectively. These real mortality ratios were obviously lower than the estimated mortality ratios predicted by APACHE II scores. CONCLUSIONS: These finding suggest that the blood purification using a PMMA hemofilter would be effective for the treatment of AKI and ALI/ARDS in SAP patients.

Microbleeds and clinical outcome in acute mild stroke patients treated with antiplatelet therapy: ADS post-hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In this post-hoc analysis using acute dual study dataset, the impacts of cerebral microbleeds (MBs) after mild stroke on clinical outcome were investigated. METHODS: The number of MBs on admission was categorized as 1) no MBs, 2) MBs 1-4, 3) MBs 5-9, and 4) MBs ≥ 10. The efficacy outcome was defined as neurological deterioration and stroke recurrence within 14 days. Safety outcomes included ICH and/or SAH as well as extracranial hemorrhages. RESULTS: Of the 1102 patients, 780 (71%) had no MBs on admission, while 230 (21%) had MBs 1-4, 48 (4%) had MBs 5-9, and 44 (4%) had MBs ≥ 10. The number of MBs was not associated with the neurological deterioration and/or stroke recurrence (p = 0.934), ICH and/or SAH (p = 0.743), and extracranial hemorrhage (p = 0.205). Favorable outcome was seem in 84% in the No MBs group, 83% in the MBs 1-4, 94% in the MBs 5-9, and 85% in the MBs ≥ 10 (p = 0.304). Combined cilostazol and aspirin therapy did not alter any rates of efficacy and safety outcomes among the no MBs, MBs 1-4, MBs 5-9, and MBs ≥ 10 groups compared to aspirin alone (all p > 0.05). By multivariate regression analysis, a history of ICH and diastolic blood pressure were the independent parameters to all of the MBs criteria (presence, MBs ≥ 5, and MBs ≥ 10). CONCLUSIONS: MBs did not alter the clinical outcome at 3 months of onset. Elevated diastolic blood pressure and a history of ICH were the essential parameters related to the MBs.

Cilostazol Addition to Aspirin could not Reduce the Neurological Deterioration in TOAST Subtypes: ADS Post-Hoc Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Our previous trial acute dual study (ADS) reported that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using cilostazol and aspirin did not reduce the rate of short-term neurological worsening in non-cardioembolic stroke patients. Present post-hoc analysis investigated whether the impact of combined cilostazol and aspirin differed among stroke subtypes and factors associated with neurological deterioration and/or stroke recurrence. METHODS: Using the ADS registry, the rate of neurological deterioration, defined as clinical worsening and/or recurrent stroke, including transient ischemic attack was calculated. Stroke subtypes included large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA), small vessel occlusion (SVO), other determined etiology (Others), and undetermined etiology of stroke (Undetermined). RESULTS: Data of 1022 patients were analyzed. Deterioration was seen in 104 (10%) patients, and the rates were not markedly different between patients treated with DAPT vs. aspirin in any stroke subtypes: LAA, 19% vs. 11%, (p=0.192); SVO, 10% vs. 10% (p=1.000); Others, 6% vs. 6% (p=1.000); Undetermined, 11% vs. 8% (p=0.590). Diabetes mellitus was the independent factor associated with deterioration (odds ratio 4.360, 95% confidence interval 1.139-16.691, p=0.032) in the LAA group. Age (1.030 [1.004-1.057], p=0.026), systolic blood pressure (1.012 [1.003-1.022], p=0.010), and infarct size (2.550 [1.488-4.371], p=0.001) were associated with deterioration in SVO group, and intracranial stenosis/occlusion was associated with it in the Undetermined group (3.744 [1.138-12.318], p=0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Combined cilostazol and aspirin did not reduce the rate of short-term neurological deterioration in any clinical stroke subtype. The characteristics of patients whose condition deteriorates in the acute period may differ based on the stroke subtypes.

Cilostazol uncovers covert atrial fibrillation in non-cardioembolic stroke.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that administration of cilostazol may clarify the occult atrial fibrillation (AF) during hospitalization in mild stroke patients, who has no history of AF. METHODS: From our prospective non-cardioembolic stroke study, randomized to dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol and aspirin or aspirin alone trial (ADS), data on the presence or absence of AF were retrospectively analyzed. In the ADS, during hospitalization, as a routine examination, presence of AF was investigated using electrocardiogram (ECG), ECG monitoring and Holter ECG. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the independent parameters related to the AF. Clinical outcome at 3 months was evaluated using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. RESULTS: Data on 1194 patients (793 [66%] men; median age [interquartile range] of 69 [61-77] years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 2 [1-4], onset-to-admission 10.8 [4.7-20.5] hours) were retrospectively analyzed. AF was newly detected in 41 (3%) patients (3 by ECG, 21 by the ECG monitoring and 17 by the Holter ECG) during hospitalization. Patients treated with combined cilostazol and aspirin therapy frequently had the AF than those took aspirin alone (5% vs. 2%, p = .007). Multivariate regression analysis showed that cilostazol administration was one of the independent factors for new-AF (odds ratio 2.672, 95%CI: 1.205-5.927, p = .016). The frequency of mRS 0-1 was 68% in the new-AF group and 67% in the non-AF group (p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: Cilostazol therapy may increase the detectability of AF in acute non-cardioembolic stroke, though the new-AF was not related to clinical outcome at 3 months.

Acute Aspirin Plus Cilostazol Dual Therapy for Noncardioembolic Stroke Patients Within 48 Hours of Symptom Onset.

Background The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet (aspirin plus cilostazol) dual therapy for patients with noncardioembolic stroke within 48 hours of symptom onset. Methods and Results The ADS (Acute Aspirin Plus Cilostazol Dual Therapy for Non-Cardiogenic Stroke Patients Within 48 Hours of Symptom Onset ) study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter (34 hospitals in Japan), randomized, open-label, and aspirin-controlled trial. Acute stroke patients with noncardioembolic stroke within 48 hours of onset were studied. The subjects were randomly allocated to combination therapy with aspirin 81 to 200 mg plus cilostazol 200 mg (dual group) and single therapy with aspirin 81 to 200 mg (aspirin group) for 14 days. After the 14 days, all patients took the cilostazol 200 mg for 3 months. A primary efficacy outcome was defined as any one of the following occurring (neurological deterioration, symptomatic stroke recurrence, or transient ischemic attack) within 14 days. A primary safety outcome included intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Between May 2011 and June 2017, 1201 patients (796 [66%] men; median age, 69 [61-77] years) randomized 1:1 to either the dual group or the aspirin group were analyzed. Initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 2 (1-4) in both groups (P=0.830). A primary efficacy outcome was observed in 11% in the dual group and 11% in the aspirin group (P=0.853). A primary safety outcome occurred in 2 (0.3%) in the dual group and in 1 (0.2%) in the aspirin group (P=0.624). Conclusions Dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol and aspirin was safe but did not reduce the rate of short-term neurological worsening. Clinical Trial Registration URL: umin.ac.jp/ctr/index/htm. Unique identifier: UMIN000004950.

Dumbbell C2 schwannomas involving both sensory and motor rootlets: report of two cases.

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Intradural-extradural dumbbell C2 schwannomas are rare. This report concerns two such cases with the intradural compartment located ventral to the spinal cord and involving both sensory and motor rootlets. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: One patient was a 57-year-old woman with sensory disturbances in the right extremities and hyperreflexia in the left extremities. The other patient was a 73-year-old man who presented with tetraparesis, walking disability, atrophy of the nuchal and bilateral shoulder muscles, and pain in the right C2 dermatome. INTERVENTION: The extradural component of the tumor was removed first; next, the intradural component was removed successfully via the posterior approach combined with a C1-C2 laminectomy. The patients experienced symptomatic improvement without further deficits except for sensory impairment of the C2 dermatome in one of the patients. CONCLUSION: Intradural-extradural dumbbell C2 schwannomas can be satisfactorily managed with a posterior approach. Removal of the extradural component and opening of the dural ring of the C2 nerve root are necessary for safe extraction of the intradural ventrally located component after debulking. These tumors may arise extradurally within the nerve sheath, extend intradurally and ventrally toward the spinal cord, and involve both sensory and motor rootlets.

[The efficacy of prophylactic administration of SBT/ABPC for postoperative infection in neurosurgical operations].

We investigated prospectively the efficacy of sulbactam sodium/ampicillin sodium (SBT/ABPC), which is a combination drug of ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor, as a preventive drug against postoperative infection in the field of neurological surgery. One hundred and six patients were given SBT/ABPC as follows: Before anesthetic induction at surgery, 1.5 g of SBT/ABPC was administrated by intravenous drip infusion, and further doses were continued at 12-hour intervals for 5 to 7 days. We assessed postoperative infection, type of surgery, duration of operation, and amount of hemorrhage. Search for related side effects and bacteriological examinations of the nasal cavity and throat before and after treatment were performed. The result was that postoperative infection was found in none of the patients. Adverse reactions due to SBT/ABPC such as apparent skin symptoms or gastrointestinal symptoms were not observed. Considering infections highly resistant to MRSA, SBT/ABPC would be effective to prevent postoperative infection in neurosurgical operations and could be used safely.

Degloving transfacial approach with Le Fort I and nasomaxillary osteotomies: alternative transfacial approach.

OBJECTIVE: We present surgical results obtained with the use of an alternative transfacial approach to the central cranial base. METHODS: A degloving transfacial approach, which is a combination of the midface degloving procedure, the Le Fort I osteotomy with a pediculated cartilaginous septum, and a nasomaxillary osteotomy, was used in 13 procedures for 8 patients. The lower clivus and upper cervical spine were approached via a submucosal route, without opening of the oropharyngeal mucosa. The wall of the nasopharynx was closed with the mucosa of the bony septum. Several patients had previously undergone other surgical procedures and received radiotherapy. RESULTS: The follow-up periods ranged from 4 months to 6.4 years. The same procedure was repeated three times for one patient, with intervals of 5.5 and 1.5 months, and twice for three patients, with intervals of 8.2, 6.3, and 1.3 years. A maxillary antrotomy or bifrontal craniotomy with removal of the orbital bar was combined with this technique. No significant or insurmountable technical problems were encountered, even among patients who had undergone previous surgery or radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our technique is relatively simple, with good cosmetic results, and affords sufficient access to the central cranial base from the frontal base down to the upper cervical spine, especially for epidural lesions located in the midline between the carotid arteries. It offers much lower risks of damage to vital neurovascular structures, as well as of meningeal or pharyngeal infectious problems, wound dehiscence, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage. This procedure can be repeated without any increase in difficulty.