Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Patients With Spinal Metastases.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with spine metastases maximizes local tumor control and preserves neurologic function. A novel approach could be the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost delivering modality. The aim of the present study is to report our experience in the treatment of spine metastases using a frameless radiosurgery system delivering stereotactic body radiation therapy-simultaneous integrated boost technique. The primary endpoints were the pain control and the time to local progression; the secondary ones were the overall survival and toxicity. A total of 20 patients with spine metastases and 22 metastatic sites were treated in our center with stereotactic body radiation therapy-simultaneous integrated boost between December 2007 and July 2018. Stereotactic body radiation therapy-simultaneous integrated boost treatments were delivered doses of 8 to 10 Gy in 1 fraction to isodose line of 50%. The median follow-up was 35 months (range: 12-110). The median time to local progression for all patients was not reached and the actuarial 1-, 2-, and 3-years local free progression rate was 86.36%. In 17 of 20 patients, a complete pain remission was observed and 3 of 20 patients had a partial pain remission (complete pain remission + partial pain remission: 100%). The median overall survival was 38 months (range 12-83). None of the patients experienced neither radiation adverse events (grade 1-4) nor reported pain flair reaction. None of the patients included in our series experienced vertebral compression fracture. Spine radiosurgery with stereotactic body radiation therapy-simultaneous integrated boost is safe. The use of this modality in spine metastases patients provides an excellent local control.

A feasibility dosimetric study on prostate cancer : are we ready for a multicenter clinical trial on SBRT?

PURPOSE: The Italian Association of Medical Physics (AIFM) started a working group dedicated to stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment. In this work, we performed a multicenter planning study on patients who were candidates for SBRT in the treatment of prostate cancer with the aim of evaluating the dosimetric consistency among the different hospitals. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fourteen centers were provided the contours of 5 patients. Plans were performed following the dose prescription and constraints for organs at risk (OARs) of a reference paper. The dose prescription was 35 Gy in five fractions for the planning target volume (PTV). Different techniques were used (3D-CRT, fixed-Field IMRT, VMAT, CyberKnife). Plans were compared in terms of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters. Furthermore, the median DVH was calculated and one patient was re-planned. RESULTS: A total of 70 plans were compared. The maximum dose to the body was 107.9 ± 4.5 % (range 101.5-116.3 %). Dose at 98 % (D98 %) and mean dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) were 102.0 ± 0.9 % (global range 101.1-102.9 %) and 105.1 ± 0.6 % (range 98.6-124.6 %). Similar trends were found for D95 % and mean dose to the PTV. Important differences were found in terms of the homogeneity index. Doses to OARs were heterogeneous. The subgroups with the same treatment planning system showed differences comparable to the differences of the whole group. In the re-optimized plans, DVH differences among institutes were reduced and OAR sparing improved. CONCLUSION: Important dosimetric differences with possible clinical implications, in particular related to OARs, were found. Replanning allowed a reduction in the OAR dose and decreased standard deviations. Multicenter clinical trials on SBRT should require a preplanning study to standardize the optimization procedure.

Three-dimensional treatment planning for vaginal cuff brachytherapy: dosimetric effects on organs at risk according to patients position.

PURPOSE: Aim of this study was to evaluate dose distribution within organs at risk (OARs) and planning target volume (PTV) based on three-dimensional treatment planning according to two different setup positions in endometrial carcinoma patients submitted to postoperative brachy-radiotherapy on vaginal vault. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with endometrial cancer necessitating of adjuvant brachytherapy on vaginal vault were enrolled. Pelvic computed tomography studies were prospectively obtained in two different setup positions: extend legs (A position) and gynecological (B position). Contoured OARs were bladder, rectum, and small bowel. The PTV was identified as applicator's surface with an isotropic 5-mm margin expansion. Radiation dose delivered in 1 cc (D1cc) and 2 cc (D2cc) of OAR were calculated. RESULTS: Coverage of PTV and values of D1cc and D2cc obtained for bladder and small bowel were similar in the two positions. For rectum, both D1cc and D2cc had statistically significant lower values in A with respect to B position. CONCLUSIONS: Both in A and B positions, radiation doses delivered do not exceed the dose constraints. However, A setup seems to significantly reduce doses to rectum while obtaining the same PTV coverage. The findings from our study provide evidence supporting the use of A position setup for delivering vaginal vault brachytherapy.

Stone-targeted dual-energy CT: a new diagnostic approach to urinary calculosis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess a stone-targeted low-dose protocol for the detection and characterization of urinary tract stones using a dual-energy CT scanner. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients (20 men, 19 women; age range, 22-87 years; average age, 47 years) with suspected renal colic in which ureteral stones were shown at low-dose unenhanced CT were enrolled in the study. Stone composition could be established in 24 patients, and these patients represent our study population regarding the CT characterization of stones. All examinations were performed with a preliminary low-dose unenhanced CT acquisition of the whole urinary system that was immediately followed by a limited (scanning length, 5 cm) dual-energy acquisition of the region containing the ureteral stone. Stone characterization was assessed using a dual-energy software tool available on the system. Two experienced radiologists who were blinded to the chemical composition of the stones retrospectively reviewed images and analyzed data to determine the composition of the stones. Their results were compared with the biochemical analysis results obtained by stereomicroscopy and infrared spectrometry. RESULTS: Based on in vitro-measured data, our combined protocol reduced dose by up to 50% compared with a full dual-energy acquisition; in addition, the calculated radiation doses of our protocol in patients are comparable to those of low-dose single- and dual-energy protocols. In 24 patients, 24 ureteral stones considered to be responsible for symptoms and detected at low-dose unenhanced CT were also shown at dual-energy CT. Correct chemical composition was obtained by dual-energy analysis in all 24 ureteral calculi regarding the characterization of uric acid (n = 3), calcium salt (n = 18), and combined uric acid-calcium salt (n = 3) stones. CONCLUSION: The use of dual-energy CT attenuation values made it possible to characterize all ureteral calculi, discriminating uric acid stones from calcium salt stones. The increment in radiation exposure due to contemporary scanning with two tubes at different energy levels can be substantially reduced using a limited stone-targeted dual-energy protocol.