ABSTRACT
Purpose: To demonstrate the learning curve associated with the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure and create a timetable to proficiency. Methods: Using retrospective data of a single surgeon, consecutive patients who had an arthroscopic Latarjet procedure performed between December 2015 and May 2021 were initially reviewed for inclusion in the study. Patients were excluded if medical data were insufficient for accurate surgical time record, their surgery was transitioned to open or minimally invasive, or if their surgery was performed in conjunction with a second procedure for a separate issue. All surgeries were performed on an outpatient basis and sports participation was the most common reason for initial glenohumeral dislocation. Results: Fifty-five patients were identified. Of these, 51 met the inclusion criteria. Analysis of operative times for all 51 procedures demonstrated that proficiency with the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure was obtained after 25 cases. This number was determined by 2 methods using statistical analysis (P < .05). The average operative time over the course of the first 25 cases was 105.68 minutes and beyond 25 cases was 82.41 minutes. Male gender was seen in 86.3 percent of the patients. The average age of the patients was 28.6 years old. Conclusions: With continued transition towards bony augmentation procedures for addressing glenoid bone deficiency there is an increasing demand for the arthroscopic bony glenoid reconstruction procedures including the Latarjet procedure. It is a challenging procedure with a substantial initial learning curve. For a skilled arthroscopist there is a significant decrease in overall surgical time after the first 25 cases. Clinical Relevance: The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure has advantages over the open Latarjet approach; however, it is controversial because it is technically challenging. It is important for surgeons to understand when they can expect to be proficient with the arthroscopic approach.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Knowledge regarding the biomechanics of the meniscus has grown exponentially throughout the last four decades. Numerous studies have helped develop this knowledge, but these studies have varied widely in their approach to analyzing the meniscus. As one of the subcategories of mechanical phenomena Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms, mechanical stress was introduced in 1973. This study aims to provide an up-to-date chronological overview and highlights the evolutionary comprehension and understanding of meniscus biomechanics over the past forty years. METHODS: A literature review was conducted in April 2021 through PubMed. As a result, fifty-seven papers were chosen for this narrative review and divided into categories; Cadaveric, Finite element (FE) modeling, and Kinematic studies. RESULTS: Investigations in the 1970s and 1980s focused primarily on cadaveric biomechanics. These studies have generated the fundamental knowledge basis for the emergence of FE model studies in the 1990s. As FE model studies started to show comparable results to the gold standard cadaveric models in the 2000s, the need for understanding changes in tissue stress during various movements triggered the start of cadaveric and FE model studies on kinematics. CONCLUSION: This study focuses on a chronological examination of studies on meniscus biomechanics in order to introduce concepts, theories, methods, and developments achieved over the past 40 years and also to identify the likely direction for future research. The biomechanics of intact meniscus and various types of meniscal tears has been broadly studied. Nevertheless, the biomechanics of meniscal tears, meniscectomy, or repairs in the knee with other concurrent problems such as torn cruciate ligaments or genu-valgum or genu-varum have not been extensively studied.
