Biomechanical demands on posterior fusion instrumentation during lordosis restoration procedures.

OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to investigate the forces placed on posterior fusion instrumentation by 3 commonly used intraoperative techniques to restore lumbar lordosis: 1) cantilever bending; 2) in situ bending; and 3) compression and/or distraction of screws along posterior fusion rods. METHODS Five cadaveric torsos were instrumented with pedicle screws at the L1-5 levels. Specimens underwent each of the 3 lordosis restoration procedures. The pedicle screw pullout force was monitored in real time via strain gauges that were mounted unilaterally at each level. The degree of correction was noted through fluoroscopic imaging. The peak loads experienced on the screws during surgery, total demand on instrumentation, and resting loads after corrective maneuvers were measured. RESULTS A mean overall lordotic correction of 10.9 ± 4.7° was achieved. No statistically significant difference in lordotic correction was observed between restoration procedures. In situ bending imparted the largest loads intraoperatively with an average of 1060 ± 599.9 N, followed by compression/distraction (971 ± 534.1 N) and cantilever bending (705 ± 413.0 N). In situ bending produced the largest total demand and postoperative loads at L-1 (1879 ± 1064.1 and 487 ± 118.8 N, respectively), which were statistically higher than cantilever bending and compression/distraction (786 ± 272.1 and 138 ± 99.2 N, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In situ bending resulted in the highest mechanical demand on posterior lumbar instrumentation, as well as the largest postoperative loads at L-1. These results suggest that the forces generated with in situ bending indicate a greater chance of intraoperative instrumentation failure and postoperative proximal pedicle screw pullout when compared with cantilever bending and/or compression/distraction options. The results are aimed at optimizing correction and fusion strategies in lordosis restoration cases.

Biomechanical Determination of Distal Level for Fusions across the Cervicothoracic Junction.

Study Design In vitro testing. Objective To determine whether long cervical and cervicothoracic fusions increase the intradiscal pressure at the adjacent caudal disk and to determine which thoracic end vertebra causes the least increase in the adjacent-level intradiscal pressure. Methods A bending moment was applied to six cadaveric cervicothoracic spine specimens with intact rib cages. Intradiscal pressures were recorded from C7-T1 to T9-10 before and after simulated fusion by anterior cervical plating and posterior thoracic pedicle screw constructs. The changes in the intradiscal pressure from baseline were calculated and compared. Results No significant differences where found when the changes of the juxtafusion intradiscal pressure at each level were compared for the flexion, extension, and left and right bending simulations. However, combining the pressures for all directions of bending at each level demonstrated a decrease in the pressures at the T2-T3 level. Exploratory analysis comparing changes in the pressure at T2-T3 to other levels showed a significant decrease in the pressures at this level (p = 0.005). Conclusions Based on the combined intradiscal pressures alone it may be advantageous to end long constructs spanning the cervicothoracic junction at the T2 level if there are no other mitigating factors.

Biomechanical analysis of derotation of the thoracic spine using pedicle screws.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical analysis of derotational load-to-failure of pedicle screw (PS) instrumentation in cadaveric thoracic spinal segments. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the derotational torque that can be applied to the thoracic spine through different linked constructs and evaluate the modes of failure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Thoracic derotation with PSs has been shown to provide better 3 plane correction than other methods but the effects of linked PS constructs has not been studied. METHODS: Four groups of thoracic segments with different PS constructs were loaded to failure with a rotational torque applied to the construct to simulate the left to right derotational force applied to a typical idiopathic dextrorotary thoracic scoliosis curve. Single screw T4 segments instrumented on the medial (group 1M) and lateral (group 1L) sides, bilaterally-linked T5 segments (group 2), unilaterally-linked T6-T9 segments on the medial (group 3M) and lateral (group 3L) sides, and quadrangularly-linked T6-T9 segments (group 4) were loaded with MTS machine in a simulated thoracic derotation model. RESULTS: Single T4 PSs on the medial and lateral sides failed at 4.0 +/- 1.4 Nm (group 1M) and 6.1 +/- 2.5 Nm (group 1L), respectively. Bilaterally-linked T5 screws failed at 11.9 +/- 3.1 Nm (group 2). Unilaterally linked T6-T9 PS constructs on the medial and lateral sides failed at 21.2 +/- 7.5 Nm (group 3M) and 17.9 +/- 11.1 Nm (group 3L), respectively. Quadrangularly-linked PSs failed at 42.5 +/- 14.5 Nm (group 4). CONCLUSION.: A near linear increase in relative torque applied before failure was found with each additional PS linked. Linked constructs allow for significantly greater torque with less risk of PS breach of the spinal canal.