Hospital-acquired symptomatic urinary tract infection in patients admitted to an academic stroke center affects discharge disposition.

OBJECTIVE: To test the role of hospital-acquired symptomatic urinary tract infection (SUTI) as an independent predictor of discharge disposition in the acute stroke patient. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of data collected from a stroke registry service. The registry is maintained by the Specialized Programs of Translational Research in Acute Stroke Data Core. The Specialized Programs of Translational Research in Acute Stroke is a national network of 8 centers that perform early phase clinical projects, share data, and promote new approaches to therapy for acute stroke. SETTING: A single university-based hospital. PARTICIPANTS: We performed a data query of the fields of interest from our university-based stroke registry, a collection of 200 variables collected prospectively for each patient admitted to the stroke service between July 2004 and October 2009, with discharge disposition of home, inpatient rehabilitation, skilled nursing facility, or long-term acute care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline demographics, including age, gender, ethnicity, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, were collected. Cerebrovascular disease risk factors were used for independent risk assessment. Interaction terms were created between SUTI and known covariates, such as age, NIHSS, serum creatinine level, history of stroke, and urinary incontinence. Because patients who share discharge disposition tend to have similar length of hospitalization, we analyzed the effect of SUTI on the median length of stay for a correlation. Days in the intensive care unit and death were used to evaluate morbidity and mortality. By using multivariate logistic regression, the data were analyzed for differences in poststroke disposition among patients with SUTI. RESULTS: Of 4971 patients admitted to the University of Texas at Houston Stroke Service, 2089 were discharged to home, 1029 to inpatient rehabilitation, 659 to a skilled nursing facility, and 226 to a long-term acute care facility. Patients with an SUTI were 57% less likely to be discharged home compared with the other levels of care (P < .0001; odds ratio 0.430 [95% confidence interval 0.303-0.609]). When considering inpatient rehabilitation versus skilled nursing facility, patients with SUTI were 38% less likely to be discharged to inpatient rehabilitation (P < .0058; odds ratio 0.626 [95% confidence interval, 0.449-0.873]). We performed interaction analyses for SUTI and age, NIHSS, urinary incontinence, serum creatinine level, and history of stroke. We noted an interaction between SUTI and NIHSS for discharge disposition to a skilled nursing facility versus a long-term acute care facility. For patients with SUTI, a 1-unit increase in NIHSS results in a 10.6% increase in the likelihood of stroke rehabilitation in a long-term acute care facility compared with 5.6% increased likelihood for patients without SUTI (P = .0370). CONCLUSIONS: Acute stroke patients with hospital-acquired SUTI are less likely to be discharged home. In our analysis, if poststroke care is necessary, then patients with SUTI are more likely to receive inpatient stroke rehabilitation at the level of care suggestive of lower functional status. For every point increase in NIHSS, stroke patients with SUTI are 10.6% more likely to require continued rehabilitation care in a long-term acute care facility versus a skilled nursing facility compared with 5.6% for patients without SUTI. The combination of premorbid urinary incontinence and urinary tract infection has no additional impact on discharge disposition. This study is limited by its retrospective nature and the undetermined role of psychosocial factors related to discharge. Prospective studies are warranted on the efficacy of early catheter discontinuation, identification of new-onset urinary incontinence, use of genitourinary barriers, and catheter care every shift as variables that can decrease the risk of infection. The information obtained from prospective studies will have an impact on resource use that is of prime importance in the current health care climate.

The interaction of aspiration pneumonia with demographic and cerebrovascular disease risk factors is predictive of discharge level of care in acute stroke patient.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate factors that help determine the post-acute level of care for stroke patients with aspiration pneumonia (ASPNA). DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study of patients admitted to the University of Texas at Houston Medical School Stroke Service between July 2004 and October 2009 with discharge dispositions of home, inpatient rehabilitation, skilled nursing facility, or subacute care (n = 3511). Demographics, stroke risk factors, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) values were collected. Interactions were evaluated between ASPNA and aging, ASPNA and NIHSS, ASPNA and use of tube feeding, and ASPNA and history of stroke. Using multivariable logistic regression, the data were analyzed for differences in disposition among patients with ASPNA. RESULTS: There were significant correlations between ASPNA and an NIHSSvalue of 7.44 or greater for discharge to inpatient rehabilitation, skilled nursing facility, or subacute care compared with discharge to home (P = 0.0138); between ASPNA and an NIHSS value of 10.93 or greater for discharge to skilled nursing facility or subacute care compared with inpatient rehabilitation (P < 0.0001); and between ASPNA and age greater than 69.30 yrs for discharge to subacute care compared with a skilled nursing facility (P G 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ASPNA and an NIHSS value of 7.44 or greater are more likely to require additional postacute care. ASPNA and an NIHSS value of 10.93 or greater increased the chance of postacute care at a level suggestive of lower functional status (skilled nursing facility or subacute care compared with inpatient rehabilitation). Age greater than 69.30 yrs plus ASPNA increased the likelihood of placement in subacute care vs. a skilled nursing facility.

Rehabilitation--emerging technologies, innovative therapies, and future objectives.

Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability. The goal of stroke rehabilitation is to improve recovery in the years after a stroke and to decrease long-term disability. This article, titled "Rehabilitation--Emerging Technologies, Innovative Therapies, and Future Objectives" gives evidence-based information on the type of rehabilitation approaches that are effective to improve functional mobility and to address cognitive impairments. We review the importance of taking a translational approach to neurorehabilitation, considering the interaction of motor and cognitive systems, skilled learned purposeful limb movement, and spatial navigation ability. Known biologic mechanisms of neurorecovery are targeted in relation to technology implemented by members of the multidisciplinary team. Results from proof-of-concept, within subjects, and randomized controlled trials are presented, and the implications for optimal stroke rehabilitation strategies are discussed. Developing clinical practices are highlighted and future research directions are proposed with goals to provide insight on what the next steps are for this burgeoning discipline.

Thrombolysis with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator predicts a favorable discharge disposition in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acute ischemic stroke patients who receive recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) within 3 hours of symptom onset are 30% more likely to have minimal to no disability at 3 months. During hospitalization, short-term disability is subjectively measured by discharge disposition, whether to home, inpatient rehabilitation, a skilled nursing facility, or subacute care. There are no studies assessing the role of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator use as a predictor of poststroke discharge disposition. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with ischemic stroke who presented within the original three hour window for intravenous thrombolysis, and who were admitted to the University of Texas Houston Medical School Stroke Service at Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center between January 2004 and October 2009. Baseline demographics and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score were collected. Cerebrovascular disease risk factors were used for risk stratification in the multivariate regression. RESULTS: Out of 2225 patients with acute ischemic stroke, 1019 were discharged to home, 719 to inpatient rehabilitation, 371 to a skilled nursing facility and 116 to subacute care. Patients who received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy were more likely to be discharged home compared to the other levels of care (P<0.0001; OR, 1.945; 95% CI, 1.538 to 2.459). Considering post-acute inpatient rehabilitation versus skilled nursing facility/subacute care and disposition at a skilled nursing facility versus subacute care, there were no differences in disposition between patients who received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy. Inpatient Rehabilitation versus Skilled Nursing Facility or Subacute Care (P = 0.123); Skilled Nursing Facility versus Subacute Care (P = 0.605). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who receive intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator as treatment for acute ischemic stroke are more likely to be discharged directly home after hospitalization. This study is limited by its retrospective nature and the undetermined role of psychosocial factors related to discharge.