Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Parasitol Res ; 123(5): 211, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748261

ABSTRACT

Ivermectin is one of the most widely used drugs for parasite control. Previous studies have shown a reduction in the abundance and diversity of "non-target" coprophilous organisms due to the presence of ivermectin (IVM) in bovine faecal matter (FM). Due to its breadth of behavioural habits, Calliphora vicina is a suitable dipteran species to evaluate the effects of IVM in FM. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of five concentrations of IVM in FM (3000, 300, 100, 30, and 3 ng/g) on the development of C. vicina. The following endpoints were evaluated: survival (between the first larval stage and emergence of new adults), larval development times to pupation and pupation times to adult, and adult emergence (% sex) and LC50. Sampling was performed from larval hatching at 60 and 120 min and at 3, 4, 5, and 12 h, and every 24 h specimens were weighed until pupae were observed. Data were analysed by ANOVA using a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and as a function of elapsed development time and accumulated degree hours (ADH). Mortality at 3000 and 300 ng/g was 100% and 97%, respectively. There were statistically significant delays in adult emergence time (p = 0.0216) and in the ADH (p = 0.0431) between the control group (C) and 100 ng/g. The LC50 was determined at 5.6 ng/g. These results demonstrate the lethal and sub-lethal effects of IVM on C. vicina, while highlighting the usefulness of this species as a bioindicator for ecotoxicological studies.


Subject(s)
Calliphoridae , Feces , Ivermectin , Larva , Animals , Ivermectin/pharmacology , Calliphoridae/drug effects , Calliphoridae/growth & development , Larva/drug effects , Larva/growth & development , Feces/parasitology , Cattle , Survival Analysis , Pupa/drug effects , Pupa/growth & development , Female , Antiparasitic Agents/pharmacology , Male , Lethal Dose 50 , Diptera/drug effects , Diptera/growth & development
2.
Parasitol Res ; 109(3): 707-13, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21380576

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of the nematode-trapping fungus Duddingtonia flagrans incorporated into an energy block was evaluated for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep. Four naturally parasitised sheep with average nematode egg counts of 2,470 eggs per gram grazed by pairs on two similar parasite-free paddocks for 30 days. During that period, one pair of sheep (treated animals, T1) received an energy block containing chlamydospores of D. flagrans at a dose of 200,000 chlamydopores/kg bw/day, while the second pair (control animals, C1) received a fungus-free energy block. The animals in both groups were taken off the paddocks after contaminating the pastures for a month with either nematode eggs plus fungal chlamydospores (T1) or nematode eggs alone (C1). Twelve parasite-free sheep were divided into two groups of six animals each, the treated group (T2) was placed on the paddock previously contaminated with parasites and fungus, while the control group (C2) was placed on the parasite-only paddock. These two groups grazed on their respective paddocks during 30 days and were then housed for 15 days, after which period they were slaughtered in order to determine the parasite burden present in each animal. Results showed that animals in group T2 harboured significantly less nematodes than their counterpart in group C2. The efficacy of D. flagrans was 92% against the total parasite burden, 100% against Haemonchus contortus and Teladorsagia circumcincta, 89.9% against Trichostrongylus colubriformis, 87.5% against Cooperia onchopora, and 90% against Trichostrongylus axei. No efficacy was detected against Nematodirus spathiger, Trichuris ovis and T. skrjabini.


Subject(s)
Ascomycota/growth & development , Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic/veterinary , Nematoda/pathogenicity , Parasitic Diseases, Animal/prevention & control , Parasitic Diseases, Animal/parasitology , Sheep Diseases/prevention & control , Animals , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Tract/parasitology , Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic/parasitology , Male , Nematoda/growth & development , Parasite Egg Count , Parasite Load , Parasites/classification , Parasites/isolation & purification , Prevalence , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/parasitology
3.
Parasitol Res ; 108(5): 1185-91, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21107865

ABSTRACT

The effect of ivermectin excreted in faeces of cattle treated in late winter on the arthropods and the degradation of faeces on pasture were evaluated. Four calves of similar age and weight were allocated to two groups, one group was treated subcutaneously with ivermectin and the other group remained as untreated control. From faeces collected from both groups at 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days post-treatment (dpt), three faecal pats of 1 kg each were made and deposited on a mixed paddock. One quarter of each faecal pat was removed at 10, 20, 30 and 60 days postdeposition (dpd) to determine the concentration of ivermectin, the organic matter content, and to collect colonising dung arthropods. Concentrations at days 3 and 7 pt were significantly higher than at the other dpt (p<0.05). The highest ivermectin concentrations were found in samples from 3 dpt (p<0.05). The organic matter percentage was not significantly different between treatments. An edaphic fauna characterised the colonisation of the faeces by organisms. Although arthropods' abundance differences were not significant except for the 28 dpt at 30 dpd (p<0.0003), fewer organisms were collected from the ivermectin group at all times.


Subject(s)
Anthelmintics/analysis , Anthelmintics/pharmacology , Arthropods/drug effects , Environmental Monitoring , Environmental Pollution , Ivermectin/analysis , Ivermectin/pharmacology , Animals , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Biodegradation, Environmental , Cattle , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Environmental Pollutants/pharmacology , Feces/chemistry , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL