Heparin dosing in patients with Impella-supported cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND: Impella™ is increasingly used in cardiogenic shock. However, thromboembolic and bleeding events are frequent during percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS). OBJECTIVE: Therefore, we aimed to explore the optimal anticoagulation regime for pMCS to prevent thromboembolism and bleedings. METHODS: This hypothesis-generating multi-center cohort study investigated 170 patients with left-Impella™ support. We (A) compared bleeding/thrombotic events in two centers with therapeutic range (TR-aPTT) activated partial thromboplastin time (60-80s) and (B) compared events of these centers with one center with intermediate range aPTT (40-60s). RESULTS: After matching, there were no differences in patients' characteristics. In centers aiming at TR-aPTT, major bleeding was numerically lower with aPTT <60s within 48 h of left-Impella™ support, versus patients that achieved the aimed aPTT of ≥60s [aPTT ≥60s: 22 (37.3%) vs. aPTT<60s 14 (23.7%); Hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 (95%) CI, 0.28-1.38; p = 0.234]. Major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (MACCE) did not differ between groups. In comparison of centers, TR-aPTT strategy showed higher major bleeding rates [TR: 8 (47.1%) vs. intermediate range: 1 (5.9%); HR, 0.06 (95%) CI, 0.01-0.45; p = 0.006]. MACCE were lower in the intermediate range aPTT group as well [TR 12 (70.6%) vs. intermediate range 5 (29.4%) HR, 0.32 (95%) CI, 0.11-0.92; p = 0.034]. CONCLUSION: This pilot analysis showed that lowering UFH-targets in left-Impella™ supported CS patients seems to be a safe and promising strategy for reducing major bleedings without increasing MACCE. This needs to be validated in larger, randomized clinical trials.

Platelet reactivity is higher in e-cigarette vaping as compared to traditional smoking.

INTRODUCTION: Vaping emerges as alternative to standard tobacco smoking. However, there is evidence for critical cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and respiratory side effects. Nevertheless, long-term vaping effects on thrombocyte reactivity have not been investigated. Therefore, we investigated the influence of vaping on thrombocyte reactivity in comparison to standard smoking and non-smoking. METHODS: Platelet function was measured by Multiplate Impedance Aggregometry as area under the curve (AUC). Smoking habits and characteristics were assessed by questionnaire. Results were analyzed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and conventional t-tests to test for robustness. RESULTS: After IPTW adjustment, participants in all groups were balanced by age, gender, body height and weight. Collagen-induced aggregation was higher in vapers compared to non-smokers (non-smokers 52.55 ± 23.97 vs. vapers 66.63 ± 18.96 AUC, p = 0.002) and to smokers (vapers vs. smokers 49.50 ± 26.05 AUC, p < 0.0001). ADP-induced aggregation in vapers was higher compared to non-smokers (non-smokers 33.16 ± 16.61 vs. vapers 45.27 ± 18.67 AUC, p = 0.001) and was numerically increased compared to smokers (vapers vs. smokers 40.09 ± 19.80 AUC, p = 0.08). These findings remained robust in t-test analysis. CONCLUSION: This study provides first evidence that vaping leads to enhanced platelet reactivity compared to standard smoking and non-smoking. This suggests health effects of vaping might be more severe than previously assumed. Whether this effect translates to clinical outcome with a higher incidence of major cardiovascular events, should be evaluated in large-scaled clinical studies.

MTX Treatment Does Not Improve Outcome in Mice with AMI.

BACKGROUND: Targeting inflammation in patients with coronary artery disease and/or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a matter of debate. Methotrexate (MTX) is one of the most widely used immunosuppressants. Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial (CIRT) recently failed to demonstrate reduced cardiovascular events in MTX-treated patients. However, it is not known if long-term MTX treatment improves cardiac outcome in AMI. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the postischemic phase in MTX-treated mice undergoing AMI. METHODS: Wild-type mice received MTX medication intraperitoneally for 2 weeks. Afterward, AMI was induced by transient left anterior ascending artery ligation. Postischemic cardiac damage after 24 h was assessed. RESULTS: MTX treatment did not affect infarct size as compared to control (IS/AAR: Con 76.20% ± 12.37%/AAR vs. MTX 73.51 ± 11.72%/AAR, p = 0.64). Moreover, systolic function and structural parameters did not differ between groups (24hejection fraction: Con 36.49 ± 3.23% vs. MTX 32.77 ± 2.29%, p = 0.41; 24hLVID; d: Con 3.57 ± 0.17 mm vs. MTX 3.19 ± 0.13 mm, p = 0.14). Platelets were increased by MTX (Con 1,442 ± 69.20 × 103/mm3 vs. MTX 1,920 ± 68.68 × 103/mm3, p < 0.0001). White blood cell and RBC as well as rate of monocytes, granulocytes, lymphocytes, and serum amyloid P levels were equal. CONCLUSION: MTX medication did not improve postischemic cardiac damage in a murine model of AMI. Future trials are needed to identify and investigate other anti-inflammatory targets to improve cardiovascular outcome.