Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 3: CD011000, 2019 03 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30888060

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 5, 2015.Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide, with estimated 569,847 new diagnoses and 311,365 deaths per year. However, incidence and stage at diagnosis vary greatly between geographic areas and are largely dependent on the availability of a robust population screening programme. For example, in Nigeria, advanced-stage disease at presentation is common (86% to 89.3% of new cases), whereas in the UK, only 21.9% of women present with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II+ disease. Women with advanced cancer of the cervix often need palliation for distressing symptoms, such as vaginal bleeding. Vaginal bleeding can be life threatening in advanced disease, with an incidence ranging from 0.7% to 100%. Bleeding is the immediate cause of death in 6% of women with cervical cancer and its management often poses a challenge.Thus, vaginal bleeding remains a common consequence of advanced cervical cancer. Currently, there is no systematic review that addresses palliative interventions for controlling vaginal bleeding caused by advanced cervical cancer. A systematic evaluation of the available palliative interventions is needed to inform decision-making. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid, vaginal packing (with or without formalin-soaked packs), interventional radiology or other interventions compared with radiotherapy for palliative treatment of vaginal bleeding in women with advanced cervical cancer. SEARCH METHODS: The search for the original review was run in 23 March 2015, and subsequent searches for this update were run 21 March 2018. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 3) in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE via Ovid to March week 2, 2018; and Embase via Ovid to March week 12, 2018. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings and reference lists of review articles, and contacted experts in the field. We handsearched citation lists of relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomised and non-randomised comparative studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid, vaginal packing (with or without formalin-soaked packs), interventional radiology or other interventions compared with radiotherapy techniques for palliative treatment of vaginal bleeding in women with advanced cervical cancer (with or without metastasis), irrespective of publication status, year of publication or language in the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria. We found no studies for inclusion and, therefore, we analysed no data. MAIN RESULTS: The search strategy identified 1522 unique references of which we excluded 1330 on the basis of title and abstract. We retrieved the remaining 22 articles in full, but none satisfied the inclusion criteria. We identified only observational data from single-arm studies of women treated with formalin-soaked packs, interventional radiology or radiotherapy techniques for palliative control of vaginal bleeding in women with cervical cancer. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Since the last version of this review we found no new studies. There is no evidence from controlled trials to support or refute the use of any of the proposed interventions compared with radiotherapy. Therefore, the choice of intervention will be based on local resources. Radiotherapy techniques for managing vaginal bleeding are not readily available in resource-poor settings, where advanced cases of cervical cancer are predominant. Thus, this systematic review identified the need for a randomised controlled trial assessing the benefits and risks of palliative treatments for vaginal bleeding in women with advanced cervical cancer.


Subject(s)
Palliative Care/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/complications , Uterine Hemorrhage/therapy , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Tampons, Surgical , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Hemorrhage/etiology
2.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (5): CD011000, 2015 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25932968

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women worldwide, with around 500,000 new diagnoses and 273,000 deaths per year. However, incidence and stage at diagnosis vary greatly between geographic areas and are largely dependent on the availability of a robust population screening programme. For example, in Nigeria, advanced-stage disease at presentation is common (86% to 89.3% of new cases), whereas in the UK, only 21.9% of women present with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II+ disease. Women with advanced cancer of the cervix often need palliation for distressing symptoms, such as vaginal bleeding. Vaginal bleeding can be life threatening in advanced disease, with an incidence ranging from 0.7% to 100%. Bleeding is the immediate cause of death in 6% of women with cervical cancer and its management often poses a challenge.Thus, vaginal bleeding remains a common consequence of advanced cervical cancer. Currently, there is no systematic review that addresses palliative interventions for controlling vaginal bleeding caused by advanced cervical cancer. A systematic evaluation of the available palliative interventions is needed, to inform decision-making. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid, vaginal packing (with or without formalin-soaked packs), interventional radiology or other interventions compared with radiotherapy for palliative treatment of vaginal bleeding in women with advanced cervical cancer. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Issue 2, 2015; the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register; MEDLINE from 1980 to March week 3, 2015 and EMBASE from 1980 to February week 12, 2015. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings and reference lists of review articles and contacted experts in the field. We handsearched citation lists of relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomised and non-randomised comparative studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid, vaginal packing (with or without formalin-soaked packs), interventional radiology or other interventions compared with radiotherapy techniques for palliative treatment of vaginal bleeding in women with advanced cervical cancer (with or without metastasis), irrespective of publication status, year of publication or language in the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria. We found no studies were identified for inclusion and, therefore, we analysed no data. MAIN RESULTS: The search strategy identified 1335 unique references of which 1160 were excluded on the basis of title and abstract. We retrieved the remaining 22 articles in full, but none satisfied the inclusion criteria. We identified only observational data from single-arm studies of women treated with formalin-soaked packs, interventional radiology or radiotherapy techniques for palliative control of vaginal bleeding in women with cervical cancer. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from controlled trials to support or refute the use of any of the proposed interventions compared with radiotherapy. Therefore, the choice of intervention will be based on local resources. Radiotherapy techniques for managing vaginal bleeding are not readily available in resource-poor settings, where advanced cases of cervical cancer are predominant. Thus, this systematic review identified the need for a randomised controlled trial assessing the benefits and risks of palliative treatments for vaginal bleeding in women with advanced cervical cancer.


Subject(s)
Palliative Care/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/complications , Uterine Hemorrhage/therapy , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Tampons, Surgical , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Hemorrhage/etiology
3.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 127(1): 10-4, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24994495

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify microbes prevalent in the genital tract of pregnant women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) and to assess the susceptibility of the microbial isolates to a range of antibiotics to determine appropriate antibiotics for treating cases of PPROM in resource-limited settings. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was undertaken involving women with (n=105) and without (n=105) a confirmed diagnosis of PPROM admitted to Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, southeast Nigeria, between January 1, 2011, and April 30, 2013. Endocervical swabs were collected from all participants and examined microbiologically. Antibiotic sensitivity testing was performed using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion. RESULTS: Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli were significantly more prevalent among women with PPROM than among those without PPROM (P<0.01). Among the antibiotics considered safe to use during pregnancy, the bacteria were most sensitive to ampicillin-sulbactam, cefixime, cefuroxime, and erythromycin. CONCLUSION: For the first 48hours, women with PPROM should receive an intravenous dose combining ampicillin-sulbactam, cefixime, cefuroxime, or erythromycin with metronidazole followed by oral administration of the chosen antibiotic combination to complete a 7-day course.


Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture/microbiology , Genitalia, Female/microbiology , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Prospective Studies
4.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 124(1): 67-71, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24365208

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of ergometrine and oxytocin given intramuscularly for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage during the third stage of labor. METHODS: The study included women with a singleton pregnancy of at least 28 weeks' gestation who had a vaginal delivery. High-risk pregnancies were excluded. Oxytocin (10 IU) or ergometrine (0.5mg) were administered intramuscularly in a blinded pattern immediately after delivery of the infant. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: Postpartum blood loss (301.8 ± 109.2 mL versus 287.1 ± 84.4 mL, P=0.011) and packed cell volume (30.7 ± 1.7% versus 31.6 ± 2.0%; Z=0.00; P=0.008) were considerably reduced among parturients who received intramuscular ergometrine. The rates of therapeutic oxytocics use, blood transfusion, placental retention, and manual removal of the placenta were significantly higher in the oxytocin group. No significant differences between the groups were observed in terms of adverse effects, with the exception of diastolic hypertension, which was more common in the ergometrine group (odds ratio, 0.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.75; P=0.007). CONCLUSION: Intramuscular ergometrine is superior to intramuscular oxytocin in averting postpartum hemorrhage during the third stage of labor. There are no significant risks of adverse effects except for diastolic hypertension.


Subject(s)
Ergonovine/therapeutic use , Oxytocics/therapeutic use , Oxytocin/therapeutic use , Postpartum Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Ergonovine/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Labor Stage, Third/drug effects , Middle Aged , Oxytocics/pharmacology , Oxytocin/pharmacology , Pregnancy , Young Adult
5.
Niger Med J ; 54(1): 45-50, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23661899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Available evidence shows that only a small proportion of Nigerian women access postnatal care and practice exclusive breastfeeding. Given that both interventions are critical to the survival of both the mother and the new born, it is important to identify factors that militate against an effective postnatal care and exclusive breastfeeding in the country, in order to scale up services. The aim was to determine the major barriers to postnatal care and exclusive breastfeeding among urban women in southeastern Nigeria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 400 urban market women using semistructured questionnaires and focus group discussions. RESULTS: Out of 400 women interviewed, 365 (91.7%) attended postnatal clinic. Lack of knowledge about postnatal care services (42.2%; n = 14), distant location of the hospitals (36.4%; n = 12) and feeling that postnatal visits was not necessary (21.1%; n = 7) were the main reasons for non-attendance to postnatal clinic. With respect to exclusive breastfeeding, 143 (35.9%) of the women practiced EBF. The main reasons for nonpractice of EBF were that EBF was very stressful (26.2%; n = 67), mother's refusal (23.5%; n = 60), and the feeling that EBF was not necessary (18.1%; n = 46). Thirty five (13.7%) of the women were constrained by time while the husband's refusal accounted for 1.5% (n = 3) of the reasons for nonpractice of exclusive breastfeeding. CONCLUSION: Poor knowledge and inaccessibility to health facilities were the main obstacles to postnatal care while the practice of exclusive breastfeeding was limited by the stress and mothers refusal.

6.
Niger. med. j. (Online) ; 54(1): 45-50, 2013.
Article in English | AIM (Africa) | ID: biblio-1267618

ABSTRACT

Available evidence shows that only a small proportion of Nigerian women access postnatal care and practice exclusive breastfeeding. Given that both interventions are critical to the survival of both the mother and the new born; it is important to identify factors that militate against an effective postnatal care and exclusive breastfeeding in the country; in order to scale up services. The aim was to determine the major barriers to postnatal care and exclusive breastfeeding among urban women in southeastern Nigeria. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 400 urban market women using semistructured questionnaires and focus group discussions. Results: Out of 400 women interviewed; 365 (91.7) attended postnatal clinic. Lack of knowledge about postnatal care services (42.2; n = 14); distant location of the hospitals (36.4; n = 12) and feeling that postnatal visits was not necessary (21.1; n = 7) were the main reasons for non-attendance to postnatal clinic. With respect to exclusive breastfeeding; 143 (35.9) of the women practiced EBF. The main reasons for nonpractice of EBF were that EBF was very stressful (26.2; n = 67); mother's refusal (23.5; n = 60); and the feeling that EBF was not necessary (18.1; n = 46). Thirty five (13.7) of the women were constrained by time while the husband's refusal accounted for 1.5 (n = 3) of the reasons for nonpractice of exclusive breastfeeding. Conclusion: Poor knowledge and inaccessibility to health facilities were the main obstacles to postnatal care while the practice of exclusive breastfeeding was limited by the stress and mothers refusal


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Educational Status , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Maternal-Child Nursing , Postnatal Care , Survival
7.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 116(3): 197-200, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22196989

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the introduction of the Service Compact with all Nigerians (SERVICOM) contract on maternal health at Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria. METHODS: A retrospective and comparative study of maternal deaths between 2004 and 2010 was carried out. The main outcome measures were yearly maternal mortality ratio (MMR), relative risk (RR) of maternal mortality, and presentation-intervention interval. The yearly MMR and the RR of maternal mortality were compared with the figures from 2004, which represented the pre-SERVICOM era. RESULTS: There were 4916 live births and 54 maternal deaths during the study period, giving an MMR of 1098 per 100,000 live births. Pre-eclampsia/eclampsia was the most common direct cause (25.0%), followed by hemorrhage (18.8%) and sepsis (8.3%). Anemia (12.5%) was the most common indirect cause. There was a progressive reduction in MMR and RR of maternal mortality, with a corresponding increase in live births. The presentation-intervention interval improved significantly from 2006. CONCLUSION: A positive change in the attitude of health workers and the elimination of fee-for-service in emergency obstetric care would reduce type 3 delays in public health facilities, and consequently reduce maternal mortality.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Teaching/standards , Maternal Health Services/standards , Maternal Mortality , Pregnancy Complications/mortality , Quality Improvement , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Middle Aged , Nigeria , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Pregnancy , Program Evaluation , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...