Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
J Diabetes Investig ; 2024 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38625030

ABSTRACT

People with diabetes are encouraged to receive diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) appropriately. However, in Japan, the implementation rates of DSMES are not known. DSMES implementation rates were calculated using the National Database of claims data, which included nearly all insurance-covered medical procedures. The study enrolled participants who received regular antidiabetic medications between April 2017 and March 2018. The implementation rates of DSMES-related care were calculated by characteristics, visiting medical facilities and prefectures. In 4,465,513 participants receiving antidiabetic medications (men, 57.8%; insulin use, 14.1%), nutrition guidance (5.6%) was the most frequently provided care type. Insulin users and participants visiting Japan Diabetes Society-certified and large medical institutions had higher implementation rates of nutrition guidance. DSMES-related care might not be provided adequately for Japanese people with diabetes. Further studies are needed to develop an optimal diabetes care system.

2.
JMA J ; 7(1): 10-20, 2024 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38314426

ABSTRACT

The use of the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB) for research has increased over time. Researchers need to understand the characteristics of the data to generate quality-assured evidence from the NDB. In this review, we mapped and characterized the limitations and related strategies using the NDB for research based on the descriptions of published NDB studies. To find studies that used Japanese healthcare claims data, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ichushi-Web up to June 2023. Additionally, we hand-searched the NDB data publication list from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2017-2023). We abstracted data based on the NDB data type, research themes, age of the study sample or population, targeted disease, and the limitations and strategies in the NDB studies. Ultimately, 267 studies were included. Overall, the most common research theme was describing and estimating the prescriptions and treatment patterns (125 studies, 46.8%). There was a variation in the frequency of themes according to the type of NDB data. We identified the following categories of limitations: (1) lack of information on confounders/covariates, outcomes, and other clinical content, (2) limitations regarding patients not included in the NDB, (3) misclassification of data, (4) lack of unique identifiers and register of beneficiaries, and (5) others. Although the included studies noted several limitations of using the NDB for research, they also provided some strategies to address them. Organizing the limitations of NDB in research and the related strategies across research fields can help support high-quality NDB studies.

3.
J Diabetes Investig ; 15(3): 388-390, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38064175

ABSTRACT

Some cases of bronchial asthma are refractory to conventional therapies. As the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma has been clarified, new treatments, such as bronchial thermoplasty and biological drugs, have been developed. Tezepelumab, an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin antibody, has been reported to inhibit the exacerbation of severe asthma; however, its adverse effects on glucose metabolism have not yet been reported. We encountered a case of weight gain and worsening glycemic management in a patient with type 2 diabetes and refractory bronchial asthma after the initiation of tezepelumab treatment. It has been reported that the overexpression of thymic stromal lymphopoietin in mice resulted in an enhanced release of free fatty acids from adipose tissues and the liver; thus, the administration of anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin antibodies in the present case might have caused obesity, fatty liver and lower glucose tolerance.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Asthma , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Humans , Animals , Mice , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Weight Gain , Obesity/complications , Asthma/drug therapy , Cytokines
4.
JMA J ; 6(3): 233-245, 2023 Jul 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37560376

ABSTRACT

Background: Health insurance claims data are used in various research fields; however, an overview on how they are used in healthcare research is scarce in Japan. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review to systematically map the relevant studies using Japanese claims data. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ichushi-Web were searched up to April 2021 for studies using Japanese healthcare claims data. We abstracted the data on study characteristics and summarized target diseases and research themes by the types of claims database. Moreover, we described the results of studies that aimed to compare health insurance claims data with other data sources narratively. Results: A total of 1,493 studies were included. Overall, the most common disease classifications were "Diseases of the circulatory system" (18.8%, n = 281), "Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases" (11.5%, n = 171; mostly diabetes), and "Neoplasms" (10.9%, n = 162), and the most common research themes were "medical treatment status" (30.0%, n = 448), "intervention effect" (29.9%, n = 447), and "clinical epidemiology, course of diseases" (27.9%, n = 417). Frequent diseases and themes varied by type of claims databases. A total of 19 studies aimed to assess the validity of the claims-based definition, and 21 aimed to compare the results of claims data with other data sources. Most studies that assessed the validity of claims data compared to medical records were hospital-based, with a small number of institutions. Conclusions: Claims data are used in various research areas and will increasingly provide important evidence for healthcare policy in Japan. It is important to use previous claims database studies and share information on methodology among researchers, including validation studies, while informing policymakers about the applicability of claims data for healthcare planning and management.

5.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 10527, 2023 06 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37386086

ABSTRACT

We aimed to estimate the cumulative incidence of treatment-requiring diabetic retinopathy since clinical diagnosis of diabetes based on the course of diagnosis in a retrospective cohort study using Japan's medical claims and health checkup data (JMDC Claims Database; 2009-2020). We included patients whose diabetes was first diagnosed at medical facilities (hospitals/clinics). We grouped them by health checkup participation before diagnosis, health checkup results, and antidiabetic medication promptly after the diagnosis. The incidence of treatment-requiring diabetic retinopathy (laser photocoagulation, intraocular injection, or vitrectomy) was compared among the groups. Of 126,696 patients, those who started an antidiabetic medication promptly after diabetes diagnosis without a recent health checkup faced the highest risk of treatment-requiring diabetic retinopathy (1-/5-year cumulative incidence: 3.1%/6.0%). This increased risk was consistently observed across various analyses, including the Cox proportional hazard model, sensitivity analysis restricting to those with an eye examination, and sensitivity analysis using vitrectomy as the outcome. Among patients with HbA1c ≥ 6.5% at recent health checkups, those who promptly started an antidiabetic medication had a higher risk (1.4%/3.8%) than those who did not (0.7%/2.7%). Taking the information about the course of diabetes diagnosis is important to manage risk stratification for diabetic retinopathy appropriately.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Humans , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Diabetic Retinopathy/therapy , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Light Coagulation , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology
6.
J Diabetes Investig ; 14(7): 883-892, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37132068

ABSTRACT

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Regular screening for diabetic retinopathy is essential. This study aimed to show the process and current situation of diabetic retinopathy screening prescribed by physicians (internists) and ophthalmologists for Japanese patients with diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Japanese National Database of Insurance Claims between April 2016 and March 2018. Ophthalmology visits and fundus examinations are defined using specific medical procedure codes. The proportion of ophthalmology visits for patients with diabetic medication and for fundus examination among those who visited ophthalmologists was calculated in the fiscal year 2017. A modified Poisson regression analysis was carried out to identify factors associated with retinopathy screening. Similarly, quality indicators by prefectures were also calculated. RESULTS: Among 4,408,585 patients receiving diabetic medications (57.8% men, 14.1% insulin use), 47.4% visited the ophthalmology department and 96.9% of those underwent fundus examination. Regression analysis showed that female sex, older age, insulin use, medical facilities with Japan Diabetes Society certification and large medical facilities were predictors of fundus examination. By prefecture, the ophthalmology consultation rate and the fundus examination ranged 38.5-51.0% and 92.1-98.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of the patients who were prescribed antidiabetic medication by their physicians visited an ophthalmologist. However, most of the patients who visited an ophthalmologist had a fundus examination carried out. A similar tendency was noted for each prefecture. It is essential to reaffirm the necessity of recommending ophthalmologic examinations to physicians and healthcare professionals who care for patients with diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Insulins , Ophthalmologists , Referral and Consultation , Female , Humans , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Diabetic Retinopathy/complications , East Asian People , Mass Screening/methods , Physicians , Retrospective Studies
7.
J Diabetes Investig ; 14(5): 695-706, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36811141

ABSTRACT

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: We aimed to examine the proportion of subsequent clinic visits for persons screened as having hyperglycemia based on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at screening and the presence/absence of hyperglycemia at health checkups before 1 year of the screening among those without previous diabetes-related medical care and attending regular clinic visits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the 2016-2020 data of Japanese health checkups and claims. The study analyzed 8,834 adult beneficiaries aged 20-59 years without regular clinic visits who had never received diabetes-related medical care and whose recent health checkups showed hyperglycemia. The rates of 6-month subsequent clinic visits after health checkups were evaluated according to HbA1c levels and the presence/absence of hyperglycemia at checkups a year before. RESULTS: The overall clinic visit rate was 21.0%. The HbA1c-specific rates were 17.0, 26.7, 25.4 and 28.4% for <7.0, 7.0-7.4, 7.5-7.9 and ≥8.0% (64 mmol/mol), respectively. Persons with hyperglycemia at a previous screening had lower clinic visit rates than those without hyperglycemia, particularly in the HbA1c category of <7.0% (14.4% vs 18.5%; P < 0.001) and 7.0-7.4% (23.6% vs 35.1%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of subsequent clinic visits among those without previous regular clinic visits was <30%, including for participants with HbA1c ≥8.0%. Persons with previously detected hyperglycemia had lower clinic visit rates, despite requiring more health counseling. Our findings might be useful for designing a tailored approach to encourage high-risk individuals to seek diabetes care through clinic visits.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Hyperglycemia , Adult , Humans , Glycated Hemoglobin , Retrospective Studies , Hyperglycemia/diagnosis , Hyperglycemia/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Ambulatory Care
8.
J Diabetes Investig ; 14(3): 489-493, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36625362

ABSTRACT

Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection receiving antiretroviral therapy can develop autoimmune diseases, referred to as immune-inflammatory reconstitution syndrome. Nevertheless, only a few reports on the onset of type 1 diabetes as immune-inflammatory reconstitution syndrome are available. A 40-year-old Japanese man with HIV infection was initiated with antiretroviral therapy at the age of 29 years. He developed Graves' disease at 35 years and diabetes, with a hemoglobin A1c of 6.5%, and maintained insulin secretion at 38 years. His antiglutamic acid decarboxylase antibody level was >2,000 U/mL, and he was diagnosed with slowly progressive type 1 diabetes. At the age of 40 years, he was admitted to our hospital with diabetic ketosis. We retrospectively assayed his stored plasma samples for thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody and antiglutamic acid decarboxylase antibody, which showed positive conversion after initiating antiretroviral therapy, suggesting that Graves' disease and type 1 diabetes developed as a probable result of immune-inflammatory reconstitution syndrome.


Subject(s)
Carboxy-Lyases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Graves Disease , HIV Infections , Male , Humans , Adult , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Graves Disease/complications , Graves Disease/drug therapy , Graves Disease/diagnosis
9.
Diabetol Int ; 14(1): 40-50, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36636164

ABSTRACT

Aim: To cross-sectionally and longitudinally investigate the association between tumor markers (Cancer embryonic antigen (CEA) Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9)) and malignancies in type 2 diabetes patients without evidence of malignancy. Materials and Methods: The study included 707 patients admitted for the treatment of diabetes from 1 August 2010 to 1 September 2018. Serum CEA and CA19-9 levels were measured for screening of malignancies at admission. Abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and endoscopy were performed for close examination. The percentage of patients diagnosed with malignancy was calculated, and among those without malignancy, the incidence of malignancies was examined after discharge. Results: A total of 26 patients (3.7%) were newly diagnosed with malignancy during hospitalization. The optimal cut-off value of CEA and CA19-9 by receiver operating characteristic analysis was 5.0 ng/mL and 75 U/mL, and their positive predictive values (PPV) were 8.7% and 22.5%, respectively. The addition of CA19-9 to age, smoking status, body mass index, and glycated hemoglobin significantly improved classification performance for malignancy using net reclassification improvement (0.682, 95% CI 0.256-1.107) and integrated discrimination improvement (0.150, 95% CI 0.007-0.294). Among 681 patients without malignancies during hospitalization, 30 patients (4.4%) developed malignancies during an average follow-up of 3.9 years. CA19-9 (hazard ratio: 1.005, 95% CI: 1.003-1.008) was associated with the development of malignancies. Conclusions: PPV of serum CEA and CA19-9 for detecting malignancy was high in type 2 diabetes patients with poor glycemic control. Measuring CA19-9 was found to be valuable to cross-sectionally and longitudinally detect malignancies. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-022-00594-x.

10.
Diabetol Int ; 13(3): 548-560, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35693997

ABSTRACT

Aims: To examine the incidence of interventions for diabetic retinopathy and serious limb complications and to elucidate the patient attributes related to the incidence of each intervention based on real-world claims data from Japan. Materials and methods: A retrospective longitudinal study design involving a 9 year (2009-2018) claims database obtained from the JMDC Inc. Patients with type 2 diabetes aged 20-74 years taking antidiabetic medications were divided into two groups: "patients with newly initiated antidiabetic medication" (Group 1, n = 47,201) and "patients with continuing antidiabetic medication" (Group 2, n = 82,332). The incidence rate for each intervention was analyzed. We also divided Group 1 into the former and latter periods and investigated temporal changes. Results: The incidences of the first retinopathy intervention (laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy, or intraocular injection), vitrectomy, and lower-limb amputations in Group 1 were 7.46, 2.37, and 0.31 /1000 person-years, respectively. Those in Group 2 were about 1.2-1.5 times higher. Older age, insulin use, and being dependents rather than insured persons were associated with a higher incidence in both groups after adjustment. While the incidence of the interventions for retinopathy hardly changed during the observation period, that of lower-limb amputations decreased by 40%, with less statistical significance (p = 0.11). Conclusions: We showed the incidences of the first retinopathy interventions and lower-limb amputations and their secular trends in patients with diabetes, stratified by whether the antidiabetic medication was newly initiated or not. Older age, insulin use, and being dependents were risk factors of these interventions for diabetic complications. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-021-00566-7.

11.
J Diabetes Investig ; 13(6): 1094-1104, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35088564

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate (1) the association of lifestyle changes and living and working conditions with glycemic control and (2) whether treatment was intensified appropriately in patients with diabetes under the first COVID-19 state of emergency in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 321 participants were included. Participants completed a questionnaire regarding lifestyle changes, including diet, physical activity, and living and working conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. The change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels was estimated before (June 1, 2019 to August 31, 2019) and during (June 1, 2020 to August 31, 2020) the pandemic. Factors associated with changes in HbA1c levels were examined by multiple linear regression analysis. The proportion of patients who received treatment intensification for diabetes was compared between before and during the pandemic. RESULTS: There was no significant change in HbA1c levels before the pandemic and during the pandemic (7.13 ± 0.98% vs 7.18 ± 1.01%, P = 0.186). Teleworking (estimate 0.206, P = 0.004) and living with a dog (estimate -0.149, P = 0.038) were significantly associated with changes in HbA1c levels after adjusting for covariates. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who received treatment intensification for diabetes during the pandemic and before the pandemic in either the elderly or non-elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall glycemic control did not worsen during the pandemic. Nonetheless, environmental factors, including telework, were found to influence glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Further studies are needed to clarify whether the COVID-19 pandemic could affect treatment intensification for diabetes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Glycemic Control , Aged , Animals , COVID-19/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Dogs , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pets , Retrospective Studies
12.
J Diabetes Investig ; 13(6): 1086-1093, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35075818

ABSTRACT

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Diabetes is associated with poor clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the impact of newly diagnosed diabetes on prognosis has not been clarified. The objective of this study was to show the features and outcome of COVID-19 patients with newly diagnosed diabetes in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 62 patients with diabetes hospitalized for COVID-19 between 1 April and 18 August 2021 at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine in Tokyo, Japan. We evaluated the worst severity of COVID-19 and plasma blood glucose levels in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes or pre-existing diabetes. RESULTS: This study included 62 confirmed COVID-19 patients with diabetes, including 19 (30.6%) patients with newly diagnosed diabetes and 43 (69.4%) patients with pre-existing diabetes. Patients with newly diagnosed diabetes significantly progressed to a critical condition more frequently during hospitalization than patients with pre-existing diabetes (52.6% vs 20.9%, P = 0.018). In addition, patients with newly diagnosed diabetes had significantly higher average plasma blood glucose levels for the first 3 days after admission than those with pre-existing diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the proportion of COVID-19 patients who are newly diagnosed with diabetes is high, and they have an increased risk of developing severe disease than those with pre-existing diabetes. It might be advisable that at the point of COVID-19 diagnosis, blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels be assessed in all patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Hyperglycemia , Blood Glucose , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Humans , Hyperglycemia/complications , Hyperglycemia/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
13.
J Diabetes Investig ; 13(2): 280-291, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34309213

ABSTRACT

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To investigate the national trend in the prescription of first-line non-insulin antidiabetic agents and total medical costs (TMCs) after prescribing the drug in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Check-ups of Japan covering almost the entire Japanese population, we calculated the proportion of each antidiabetic drug from 2014 to 2017, and determined the factors associated with drug selection. The TMCs in the first year after starting the drugs were calculated, and factors associated with the costs were also determined. RESULTS: Among 1,136,723 new users of antidiabetic agents, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors were the most prescribed (65.1%), followed by biguanides (15.9%) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (7.6%). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and biguanide use increased during 2014-2017 (2.2%-11.4% and 13.7%-17.2%, respectively), whereas the others decreased. Biguanides were not prescribed at all in 38.2% of non-Japan Diabetes Society-certified facilities. The TMCs were the lowest among those who started with biguanides. Fiscal year, age, sex, facility, number of beds and comorbidities were associated with drug choice and TMCs. There were wide regional variations in the drug choice, but not in the TMCs. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike in the USA and Europe, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor is the most prescribed first-line medication for type 2 diabetes patients in Japan, while there is a wide variation in the drug choice by facility-type and prefecture.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Japan/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
14.
J Diabetes Investig ; 13(3): 571-579, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34599560

ABSTRACT

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To identify factors associated with worsening glycemic control after discontinuing diabetes care among patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study combined medical claims and health checkup data between January 2005 and April 2018. Adult Japanese workers with type 2 diabetes who had dropped out from diabetes care for ≥4 months after receiving ≥18 months of non-intermittent care and had health checkup information both before and after the dropout were included. Factors associated with changes in HbA1c during the dropout period were identified using multiple linear regression analyses and depicting restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves. RESULTS: A total of 1,125 patients (mean age: 51.2 years, baseline HbA1c: 6.8%, and number of males: 93.7%) whose follow-up HbA1c increased to 7.6% after a mean 9.3-month dropout period were included. Deterioration in HbA1c was associated with higher baseline HbA1c and sulfonylurea or insulin use. The RCS curves illustrated that patients without antidiabetic medication had small changes in HbA1c (+0.5% from a baseline HbA1c of 7.0%), whereas those using sulfonylureas or insulin had an approximately 2% or more increase in HbA1c even when maintaining reasonable glycemic control before dropping out. CONCLUSIONS: Overall in this study, glycemic control worsened during treatment interruptions among patients who were mainly male employees. However, changes in HbA1c greatly varied based on baseline HbA1c and antidiabetic medication type. Caring for patients at risk of worsening glycemic control due to treatment dropout, especially those using sulfonylurea and insulin, is imperative.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Adult , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
15.
Glob Health Med ; 4(6): 336-340, 2022 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36589220

ABSTRACT

In patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with diabetes, glycemic control is essential for a better outcome, however, we face difficulty controlling hyperglycemia induced by high-dose glucocorticoids. We report five cases of severe COVID-19 patients with diabetes, whose glycemic control was managed using an intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) system during methylprednisolone therapy. Patients using isCGM showed significantly lower average blood glucose levels and significantly higher total daily insulin dose during the methylprednisolone therapy, compared to patients under regular blood glucose monitoring. The use of isCGM enables remote glucose monitoring, and this can reduce the risks of healthcare workers who have frequent contact with the patients. Thus, we suggest that using isCGM should be considered in hospitalized patients with diabetes under the COVID-19 pandemic to achieve better glycemic control and to minimize the possible risks of healthcare workers.

16.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 26(1): 299-307, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31161662

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) is widely used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in several countries such as Japan, whereas biguanide (BG; mostly metformin) is recommended as a first-line antidiabetic medication in many countries according to evidence mainly from Western countries. Although previous studies reported that DPP4i may be more efficacious for East Asians, direct comparisons of effectiveness and cost between DPP4i and BG have never been conducted in East Asia. METHODS: We extracted claims and medical check-up data (observation period from January 2010 to March 2016) of adult patients under 70 years old with T2DM who received DPP4i or BG as first-line antidiabetic drugs. Changes in HbA1c and BMI before and 2 years after the first prescription and annual cost of antidiabetic medication during the second year were compared between the DPP4i and BG groups. RESULTS: We extracted 1034 patients who received DPP4i and 365 patients who received BG as the first antidiabetic medication (male sex, 83.0% and 84.9%; HbA1c (mean [SD]), 7.7 [1.4]% and 7.9 [1.4]%; BMI, 26.6 [4.5] kg/m2 and 28.1 [4.3] kg/m2 ). After propensity score matching, changes in HbA1c and BMI were not significantly different between the groups (HbA1c, -0.67% vs -0.80% [P = .28]; BMI, -0.3 kg/m2 vs -0.4 kg/m2 [P = .42]). Annual cost of antidiabetic drugs was significantly higher in the DPP4i group (US $458.7 vs 273.3 [P < .001]). Many patients continued each medication at the follow-up visit (78.3% of the DPP4i group and 73.7% of the BG groups). CONCLUSIONS: The first antidiabetic prescription for the patient was mostly continued thereafter. BG may be recommendable as the first-line medication for patients with T2DM, especially for middle-aged, male population with greater BMI. It is worth addressing the discrepancy between practice in Japan and that recommended in international guidelines.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors , Metformin , Adult , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Dipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-Peptidases , Drug Costs , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents , Japan , Male , Metformin/therapeutic use , Middle Aged
17.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 155: 107750, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31229599

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To calculate process quality measures of diabetes care in Japan using nationwide exclusive claims database. METHODS: Using the National Database of health insurance claims during 2015-2016, the proportions of outpatients who received recommended examinations at least annually among those with regular antidiabetic medication were calculated as quality indicators, reported altogether and by prefecture and institutional certification (from the Japan Diabetes Society). Distributions of institutional-level quality indicators were also reported. RESULTS: Among 4,154,452 outpatients, 96.7% underwent HbA1c or glycated albumin examination. Retinopathy examination was conducted among 46.5% of patients [prefecture (range): 37.5%-51.0%, institutional certification: 44.8% (without) vs. 59.8% (with)]. Urinary qualitative examination was conducted among 67.3% of patients at institutions with <200 beds (prefecture: 54.1%-81.9%, institutional certification: 66.8% vs. 92.8%), whereas urinary quantitative albumin or protein examination was conducted among 19.4% of patients (prefecture: 10.8%-31.6%, institutional certification: 18.7% vs. 54.8%). Distributions of institutional-level quality indicators showed that most institutions without institutional certification seldomly order urinary quantitative examination. CONCLUSIONS: Although the quality indicator for glycaemic control examination was favourable, some aspects of diabetes care were suboptimal and varied greatly by prefecture and institution; individual and organisational efforts to improve quality of diabetes care would be needed in Japan.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Guideline Adherence , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insurance Claim Review/statistics & numerical data , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Glucose/analysis , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged
18.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 149: 188-199, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30742858

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess the temporal changes in the quality indicators pertaining to the process measures of diabetes care during a recent decade in Japan. METHODS: A five-fold repeated cross-sectional study was conducted using health insurance claims data provided by the Japan Medical Data Center between April 2006 and March 2016. We identified 46,631 outpatients with antidiabetic medication who regularly visited hospitals or clinics at least every three months. We evaluated the quality indicators pertaining to glycemic control monitoring, lipid profile monitoring, retinopathy screening, nephropathy screening, and appropriate medication choice. The proportions of patients who received appropriate examinations/prescriptions, by observation period and either the type of antidiabetic medication or facility type were estimated using generalized estimating equation (GEE) models with multiple covariate adjustments. RESULTS: The quality indicator values for appropriate medication choice and nephropathy screening improved between 2007 and 2015, whereas those for glycemic control monitoring and retinopathy screening remained suboptimal. Patients prescribed medications in larger hospitals were likelier to undergo the recommended examinations (e.g. retinopathy screening: 36.1% (95% CI: 35.4-36.7%) for clinic, 40.6% (95% CI: 39.1-42.2%) for smaller hospital, and 46.0% (95% CI: 44.8-47.2%) for larger hospital in 2015). CONCLUSIONS: Several process measures of diabetes care remained suboptimal in Japan.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Guideline Adherence , History, 21st Century , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
19.
J Epidemiol ; 29(1): 1-10, 2019 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29937469

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several epidemiological studies have determined the relationship between diabetes and the incidence and/or prevalence of recently identified comorbid conditions (cancer, periodontal disease, fracture, cognitive impairment, and depression). These relationships may vary by country or race/ethnicity. We aimed to systematically review studies in this field conducted with the Japanese population because such a review in the Japanese population has never been undertaken. METHODS: We conducted systematic literature searches in PubMed and Ichushi-Web databases for studies published until December 2016. Studies comparing the incidence and/or prevalence of the comorbidities among the Japanese population were included. The studies were classified as integrated analyses, cohort studies, case-control studies, or cross-sectional studies. RESULTS: We identified 33 studies (cancer: 17, periodontal disease: 5, fracture: 5, cognitive impairment: 4, and depression: 2). Although several cohort studies and meta-analyses had assessed the development of cancer in diabetes, there was scant epidemiological evidence for the other conditions. Indeed, only one cohort study each had been conducted for periodontal disease, fracture, and cognitive impairment, whereas other evidence was cross-sectional, some of which was induced from baseline characteristic tables of studies designed for other purposes. CONCLUSION: In Japan, there is insufficient evidence about the relationship between diabetes and the incidence/prevalence of periodontal disease, fracture, cognitive impairment, and depression. By contrast, several cohort studies and integrated analyses have been conducted for the relationship with cancer. Further studies should be undertaken to estimate the contribution of diabetes on the incidence/prevalence of comorbidities that may be specific to the Japanese population.


Subject(s)
Comorbidity , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Japan/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Periodontal Diseases/epidemiology , Prevalence
20.
Tohoku J Exp Med ; 243(1): 35-39, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28924074

ABSTRACT

Carbohydrate-restricted diets are prevalent not only in obese people but also in the general population to maintain appropriate body weight. Here, we report that extreme carbohydrate restriction for one day affects the subsequent blood glucose levels in healthy adults. Ten subjects (median age 30.5 years, BMI 21.1 kg/m2, and HbA1c 5.5%), wearing with a continuous glucose monitoring device, were given isoenergetic test meals for 4 consecutive days. On day 1, day 2 (D2), and day 4 (D4), they consumed normal-carbohydrate (63-66% carbohydrate) diet, while on day 3, they took low-carbohydrate/high-fat (5% carbohydrate) diet. The daily energy intake was 2,200 kcal for males and 1,700 kcal for females. On D2 and D4, we calculated the mean 24-hr blood glucose level (MEAN/24h) and its standard deviation (SD/24h), the area under the curve (AUC) for glucose over 140 mg/dL within 4 hours after each meal (AUC/4h/140), the mean amplitude of the glycemic excursions (MAGE), the incremental AUC of 24-hr blood glucose level above the mean plus one standard deviation (iAUC/MEAN+SD). Indexes for glucose fluctuation on D4 were significantly greater than those on D2 (SD/24h; p = 0.009, MAGE; p = 0.013, AUC/4h/140 after breakfast and dinner; p = 0.006 and 0.005, and iAUC/MEAN+SD; p = 0.007). The value of MEAN/24h and AUC/4h/140 after lunch on D4 were greater than those on D2, but those differences were not statistically significant. In conclusion, consumption of low-carbohydrate/high-fat diet appears to cause higher postprandial blood glucose on subsequent normal-carbohydrate diet particularly after breakfast and dinner in healthy adults.


Subject(s)
Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted , Glucose/metabolism , Health , Postprandial Period , Adult , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Female , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...