ColoPlus, a new product based on bovine colostrum, alleviates HIV-associated diarrhoea.

OBJECTIVE: HIV-associated diarrhoea occurs in nearly all patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in the developing countries. Diarrhoea is caused by the HIV-related immune dysfunction and is pivotal in the decrease of the helper T-cell (CD4 + ) population. Enteric pathogens in HIV-associated diarrhoea are, for example, Cryptosporidium, Amoeba and Campylobacter species. Bovine colostrum is the first milk the suckling calf receives from the cow. It is rich in immunoglobulins, growth factors, antibacterial peptides and nutrients. It supplies the calf with a passive immunity before its own active immunity is established. ColoPlus is a product based on bovine colostrum and is designed for slow passage through the gastrointestinal tract, as well as having a high nutritional value. The aim of the study was to investigate whether ColoPlus given orally can influence the severe diarrhoea associated with HIV infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was carried out at Braithwaite Memorial Specialist Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Thirty patients with HIV-associated diarrhoea were included in the study. The patients were treated with ColoPlus for 4 weeks in an open-labelled non-randomized study, after an observational period of one week. After a post-treatment period of another two weeks, treatment with anti-HIV drugs was started, if deemed appropriate. The effects on the frequency of stool evacuations per day, on body-weight, fatigue, haemoglobin levels and CD4+ counts before (week 1) and after treatment with ColoPlus (week 7) were measured. RESULTS: There was a dramatic decrease in stool evacuations per day from 7.0+/-2.7 to 1.3+/-0.5 (+/-SD), a substantial decrease in self-estimated fatigue of 81%, an increase in body-weight of 7.3 kg per patient and an increase in CD4+ count by 125%. CONCLUSION: ColoPlus may be an important alternative or additional treatment in HIV-associated diarrhoea.

Helicobacter species ribosomal DNA in the pancreas, stomach and duodenum of pancreatic cancer patients.

AIM: To determine whether gastric and enteric Helicobacter species are associated with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with exocrine pancreatic cancer (n = 40), neuroendocrine cancer (n = 14), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (n = 8), and chronic pancreatitis (n = 5) were studied. Other benign pancreatic diseases (n = 10) and specimens of normal pancreas (n = 7) were included as controls. Pancreatic tissue specimens were analyzed by Helicobacter-specific PCR-assay and products were characterized by denaturing gradient electrophoresis and DNA-sequencing. From a subset of the pancreatic cancer patients, gastric and/or duodenal tissue as well as gallbladder and ductus choledochus tissue were analyzed. Gallbladder and choledochus samples were included as controls. Stomach and duodenum samples were investigated to analyze whether a gastric helicobacter might disseminate to the pancreas in pancreatic cancer patients. Pancreatic specimens were analyzed by Bacteroides-specific PCR for detecting the translocation of indigenous gut microbes to the diseased pancreas. RESULTS: Helicobacter DNA was detected in pancreas (tumor and/or surrounding tissue) of 75% of patients with exocrine cancer, 57% of patients with neuroendocrine cancer, 38% of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia, and 60% of patients with chronic pancreatitis. All samples from other benign pancreatic diseases and normal pancreas were negative. Thirty-three percent of the patients were helicobacter-positive in gastroduodenal specimens. Surprisingly, H. bilis was identified in 60% of the positive gastroduodenal samples. All gallbladder and ductus choledochus specimens were negative for helicobacter. Bacteroides PCR-assay was negative for all pancreatic samples. CONCLUSION: Helicobacter DNA commonly detected in pancreatic cancer suggests a possible role of the emerging pathogens in the development of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for patients with carcinoma of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Local recurrence is one of the most common sites of failure after resection of exocrine pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) involves delivery of high doses of irradiation to the pancreas in patients with locally advanced disease, and to the surgical bed following pancreatic resection while uninvolved and dose-limiting tissues are displaced. Here we report our current experience with IORT in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: IORT was given as adjuvant treatment in 18 and palliatively in 37 patients. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was in addition delivered to 10 patients in the resection group and 29 in the palliation group. The cancer diagnosis was verified histologically and/or cytologically in all patients. RESULTS: There was no hospital mortality. Among the resected patients the postoperative complication rate was 44% (8/18). The corresponding figure after palliative operation was 14% (5/37). None of the postoperative complications were regarded as a consequence of IORT. Symptoms and complaints were observed after EBRT in 70 and 90%, respectively, in the two groups. However, no symptom was serious in nature. After resection the median survival time was 9 months (range 3-58) and local recurrence was diagnosed in 33% (6/18). In the palliatively treated patients the median survival was 7 months (range 2-30) and pain requiring opioids was present in 89% (24/27) of the patients within 6 months. CONCLUSION: In this nonrandomized study no apparent beneficial effects were seen after IORT in patients with pancreatic cancer, neither adjuvantly nor palliatively. However, radiotherapy did not lead to any major complications.

[Guidelines for management of patients with chronic pancreatitis. Report from a consensus conference]. / Riktlinjer för handläggning av patienter med kronisk pankreatit. Rapport från ett konsensusmöte.

Chronic pancreatitis has an incidence of 3-8 new cases per 100,000 inhabitants and year. Alcohol is the most common cause. It is, however, not an independent risk factor but rather a co-factor. Smoking and genetic predisposition are increasingly regarded as causative factors. The diagnosis is today based mainly on history and findings at imaging tests. Pain treatment starts with NSAID-medication with or without paracetamol. Oral pancreatic enzyme therapy for pain should be tested early in the course. Endoscopic stent insertion into the main pancreatic duct can be used in selected cases. Operation is not recommended until other less invasive methods have been tested but should ideally be performed before addiction to opiates occurs. Oral enzyme supplementation is effective in the majority of cases with malnutrition. Most patients with chronic pancreatitis and diabetes need insulin treatment. Interdisciplinary specialist treatment teams should be established and take responsibility for diagnosis, assessment and interventional procedures (e.g. endoscopy, surgery). Due to the low incidence of the disease 3-4 such teams/centres seem appropriate in our country to allow a critical patient load.

Management of cancer of the ampulla of Vater: does local resection play a role?

BACKGROUND: The clinical outcome of patients with ampullary carcinoma is significantly more favorable than for patients with pancreatic head carcinoma. The Whipple procedure is the operation of choice for both diagnoses. Still local resection is recommended in selected cases. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of local resection of cancer of the ampulla of Vater by comparison with pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHOD: 92 patients with cancer of the ampulla of Vater treated between 1975 and 1999 with local resection (n = 10), pancreatic resection (n = 49) or laparotomy and no resection (n = 33) were studied retrospectively. The main outcome measures were postoperative morbidity and mortality, surgical radicality and long-term survival. RESULTS: The postoperative complication rate was significantly lower after local resection (p = 0.036) whereas mortality did not differ between the 2 resection groups. UICC stages were less advanced in the local resection group (p < 0.04). Still, the frequency of positive resection margins and RO resections was the same in both groups, as was long-term survival. Local recurrence was diagnosed in 8/10 (80%) patients after local and in 11/49 (22%) patients after pancreatic resection (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is the preferred operation for cancer of the ampulla of Vater in patients who are fit for the procedure. Local resection plays a limited role in carefully selected patients.

Extended operation with or without intraoperative (IORT) and external (EBRT) radiotherapy for gallbladder carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gallbladder carcinoma is a rare disease with dismal prognosis. However, lately improved survival has been reported after extended operation including liver resection and lymphadenectomy in addition to cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate such a surgical strategy with and without adjuvant intra- and postoperative radiotherapy (IORT/EBRT). METHODOLOGY: 20 patients underwent extended operation and the last 10 of them IORT/EBRT in addition. Tumor staging was done using the TNM system, determination of histological tumor differentiation and immunohistochemical assessment of p53, Ki67, metallothionein, deleted in colorectal cancer and carcinoembryogenic antigen in tumor tissue. RESULTS: There was no hospital mortality. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients (15%). Actuarial 5-year survival was 47% in the radiotherapy group and 13% after operation only (NS). The corresponding figures for median survival are 28.8 and 20.2 months, respectively. Five patients are still alive in the radiotherapy group. There was no difference in tumour stages of the two groups irrespective of the way of evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that extended operation for gallbladder carcinoma +/- IORT/EBRT can be done safely. The tendency to longer survival after adjuvant radiotherapy was not statistically significant.

[Guidelines for management of patients with pancreatic cancer]. / Riktlinjer för handläggning av patienter med pankreascancer.

The incidence of pancreatic cancer has fallen during the last ten years in Sweden. Early signs and symptoms of the disease are still undiscovered and when diagnosis is made the disease is incurable in most patients. Transabdominal ultrasonography is the first-line imaging test followed by spiral computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) if required for definite diagnosis. Spiral CT is also the imaging test of choice for assessment of resectability of the tumor. Surgical removal of the tumor is the only chance of cure. Markedly improved hospital mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy is reported and an association between hospital volume and outcome of the operation has been established. Longterm survival after attempted curative resection continues to be dismal, however. Adjuvant treatment should not be given outside clinical studies. Palliative treatment has improved thanks to progress in the field of endoscopy, interventional radiology and in management of pain and nutrition. Palliative chemotherapy should only be given selectively outside clinical studies. Radiotherapy has no proven effects on survival. Special pancreatic cancer treatment teams with catchment areas of 2-4 million inhabitants are recommended by international authorities.