ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations among IOL formulas after phacovitrectomy. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 206 eyes of 206 patients who underwent 25-gauge phacovitrectomy, without gas tamponade, for macular pathology. Pre-operative optical biometry used the IOLMaster 700 to calculate the IOL power with the new formulas, i.e. the Barrett Universal II (BU II), Emmetropia Verifying Optical version 2.0, Hill-Radial Basis Function (RBF) version 3.0, Kane, and Ladas Super Formula, and conventional formulas, i.e. Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/T (SRK/T). A single-piece foldable IOL was implanted in all cases. Manifest refractions were measured before and 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: The BU II formula showed the lowest standard deviation and mean and median absolute errors and had the highest percentage of eyes with a refractive prediction error within ± 0.25 D. The absolute error was significantly lower with the four new formulas, except the Hill-RBF, than with the Hoffer Q (all p = ≤ 0.010) and Holladay 1 formulas (all p = < 0.010). The absolute error with the BU II formula was also lower than that with the Holladay 2 (p = 0.012) and SRK/T (p = 0.024) formulas. CONCLUSION: Overall, the new IOL formulas, except the Hill-RBF, were superior to some of the conventional formulas for calculating IOL power in phacovitrectomy.
Subject(s)
Lenses, Intraocular , Phacoemulsification , Refractive Errors , Humans , Refraction, Ocular , Pilot Projects , Biometry , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Optics and PhotonicsABSTRACT
The enantioselective total synthesis of (-)-scabronine G is described. The key features of the present synthesis include the construction of a 5-6 ring system containing two quaternary carbon centers via a diastereoselective intramolecular double Michael reaction and the formation of a seven-membered ring using a Prins cyclization.
