Can endoscopic submucosal dissection be safely performed in a smaller specialized clinic?

AIM: To investigate whether endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be safely performed at small clinics, such as the Shirakawa Clinic. METHODS: One thousand forty-seven ESDs to treat gastrointestinal tumors were performed at the Shirakawa Clinic from April 2006 to March 2011. The efficacy, technical feasibility and associated complications of the procedures were assessed. The ESD procedures were performed by five endoscopists. Sedation was induced with propofol for esophagogastorduodenal ESD. RESULTS: One thousand forty-seven ESDs were performed to treat 64 patients with esophageal cancer (E), 850 patients with gastric tumors (G: 764 patients with cancer, 82 patients with adenomas and four others), four patients with duodenal cancer (D) and 129 patients with colorectal tumors (C: 94 patients with cancer, 21 patients with adenomas and 14 others). The en bloc resection rate was 94.3% (E: 96.9%, G: 95.8%, D: 100%, C: 79.8%). The median operation time was 46 min (range: 4-360 min) and the mean size of the resected specimens was 18 mm (range: 2-150 mm). No mortal complications were observed in association with the ESD procedures. Perforation occurred in 12 cases (1.1%, E: 1 case, G: 9 cases, D: 1 case, C: 1 case) and postoperative bleeding occurred in 53 cases (5.1%, G: 51 cases, D: 1 case, C: 1 case); however, no case required either emergency surgery or blood transfusion. All of the perforations and postperative bleedings were resolved by endoscopic clipping or hemostasis. The other problematic complication observed was pneumonia, which was treated with conservative therapy. CONCLUSION: ESD can be safely performed in a clinic with established therapeutic methods and medical services to address potential complications.

Analysis of colonoscopic perforations at a local clinic and a tertiary hospital.

AIM: To define the clinical characteristics, and to assess the management of colonoscopic complications at a local clinic. METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records was performed for the patients with iatrogenic colon perforations after endoscopy at a local clinic between April 2006 and December 2010. Data obtained from a tertiary hospital in the same region were also analyzed. The underlying conditions, clinical presentations, perforation locations, treatment types (operative or conservative) and outcome data for patients at the local clinic and the tertiary hospital were compared. RESULTS: A total of 10  826 colonoscopies, and 2625 therapeutic procedures were performed at a local clinic and 32  148 colonoscopies, and 7787 therapeutic procedures were performed at the tertiary hospital. The clinic had no perforations during diagnostic colonoscopy and 8 (0.3%) perforations were determined to be related to therapeutic procedures. The perforation rates in each therapeutic procedure were 0.06% (1/1609) in polypectomy, 0.2% (2/885) in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and 3.8% (5/131) in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Perforation rates for ESD were significantly higher than those for polypectomy or EMR (P < 0.01). All of these patients were treated conservatively. On the other hand, three (0.01%) perforation cases were observed among the 24  361 diagnostic procedures performed, and these cases were treated with surgery in a tertiary hospital. Six perforations occurred with therapeutic endoscopy (perforation rate, 0.08%; 1 per 1298 procedures). Perforation rates for specific procedure types were 0.02% (1 per 5500) for polypectomy, 0.17% (1 per 561) for EMR, 2.3% (1 per 43) for ESD in the tertiary hospital. There were no differences in the perforation rates for each therapeutic procedure between the clinic and the tertiary hospital. The incidence of iatrogenic perforation requiring surgical treatment was quite low in both the clinic and the tertiary hospital. No procedure-related mortalities occurred. Performing closure with endoscopic clipping reduced the C-reactive protein (CRP) titers. The mean maximum CRP titer was 2.9 ± 1.6 mg/dL with clipping and 9.7 ± 6.2 mg/dL without clipping, respectively (P < 0.05). An operation is indicated in the presence of a large perforation, and in the setting of generalized peritonitis or ongoing sepsis. Although we did not experience such case in the clinic, patients with large perforations should be immediately transferred to a tertiary hospital. Good relationships between local clinics and nearby tertiary hospitals should therefore be maintained. CONCLUSION: It was therefore found to be possible to perform endoscopic treatment at a local clinic when sufficient back up was available at a nearby tertiary hospital.

Clinical characteristics and treatment for patients presenting with bleeding duodenal varices.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bleeding from ectopic varices, including duodenal varices, is uncommon, but it can be difficult to manage. The clinical data of patients diagnosed and treated for duodenal varices were reviewed to investigate the strategy for treatment. METHODS: The present study reviewed the clinical data of 10 patients with duodenal varices (mean age, 58.2 ± 15.6 years) at our associated institutes during the period between January 1996 and December 2008. RESULTS: Nine patients had duodenal varices located in the second portion, whereas in one case they were located in the duodenal bulbus. The underlying diseases included liver cirrhosis in eight patients, and extrahepatic portal vein obstruction in two patients. The lesions were identified with bleeding from varices in eight of 10 patients. Initial hemostasis was achieved in all eight patients. However, among four patients treated endoscopically only, two patients died from rebleeding from varices and two died from hepatic failure resulting from variceal bleeding. Additional interventional radiology (IVR) was used in three patients and additional surgery was carried out in one case. One patient who was treated with balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration rebled during IVR and died from bleeding. Two patients who underwent double balloon-occluded embolotherapy and one case who had surgery achieved good clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although endoscopic treatment is useful for initial hemostasis of hemorrhagic duodenal varices, the patients who underwent additional IVR after endoscopic treatment achieved good outcomes.

Stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers and adenomas.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Stricture is a complication that may occur after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric neoplasms. The goal of the present study was to investigate the incidence, risk factors and management of gastric stricture after ESD. METHODS: The medical records of 308 patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasms were reviewed. Stricture is defined as having symptoms caused by an obstruction through which a 1-cm diameter endoscopic fiber cannot be passed. RESULTS: Stricture was identified in six of 308 patients (1.9%). Three of the six lesions were located in the prepylorus, two cases in the antrum and one in the cardia. The mean longitudinal distance and the mean area of the resected specimens in the six cases with stricture (7.8 ± 2.0 cm, 34.0 ± 15.8cm(2) , respectively) was significantly larger than in those without stricture (4.5 ± 1.4cm, 12.7 ± 8.3cm(2) , respectively, P<0.01). The ratio of the resected circumference/whole circumference was 83.3±7.5% in those with stricture in comparison to 25.4 ± 16.3% in those without stricture (P<0.01). All six patients underwent endoscopic balloon dilations, and obtained relief from stricture. However, one patient experienced a gastric perforation and recovered following conservative therapy. CONCLUSION: Sub-circumferential resection over 75% of the circumference by ESD in the prepylorus, antrum and cardia is a risk factor for the occurrence of stricture. Early intervention might be considered for this high-risk group to avoid a perforation during balloon dilation.

Endoscopic treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Various methods have been reported for the endoscopic treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors. The present study was designed to identify the optimal treatment strategy for an endoscopic resection. METHODS: Forty rectal carcinoid tumors of 38 patients were treated endoscopically. The indication criteria, complete resection rate, selection of treatment, local recurrence, distant metastases, and complications were analyzed. All tumors were estimated to measure 1 cm or less in diameter, without muscular invasion, atypical features, and lymph node metastases to the pararectal region. RESULTS: Complete resection of the lesions was obtained in 75.0% (30/40). The complete resection rates were 20.0% (1/5) by conventional polypectomy, 84.6% (22/26) by a two-channel endoscopic mucosal resection, and 77.8% (7/9) by endoscopic submucosal dissection. The 10 cases that did not show a clear submucosal layer after initial endoscopic treatment received additional endoscopic microwave coagulation therapy. There were no local or distant recurrences in the followed-up periods (median, 6.4 years). No difference was observed in the complete resection rate between two-channel endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Small carcinoid tumors measuring less than 1 cm in diameter can therefore be managed endoscopically with no recurrence or spread. The selection of endoscopic treatment should be made after taking such factors as cost-effectiveness, expertise, and experience into careful consideration.

[A survival case of hepatocellular carcinoma with splenic metastasis: metachronous rupture at the liver primary and splenic metastatic lesion].

A 78-year-old man was referred to our hospital in March 2003 for rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hemostasis was obtained by emergency angiography. In December 2004, metastasis to the right lung appeared and right lower lobectomy was carried out. In October 2005, a splenic metastatic lesion ruptured and hemostasis was obtained by emergency partial splenic embolization (PSE). Since viable remnants of the splenic tumor were suspected by CT, splenectomy was subsequently performed. He has been followed up in the outpatient clinic without recurrence. This is a markedly rare case of HCC in which, metachronous rupture primary and metastatic lesions, the patient was saved.

Endoscopic management of duodenal diverticular bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Although the presence of a duodenal diverticulum is usually asymptomatic, bleeding in this tissue is sometimes difficult to diagnose and treat. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the strategy for treatment, we reviewed the clinical data of patients diagnosed and treated for duodenal diverticular bleeding. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Single tertiary-referral center. PATIENTS: Seven consecutive patients with bleeding from a duodenal diverticulum (mean age, 73.7 +/- 3.4 years old). INTERVENTIONS: The clinical characteristics, endoscopic findings, and treatment strategy for duodenal diverticular bleeding. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: All 7 patients achieved hemostasis. Six of 7 patients were treated endoscopically. There were no complications with endoscopic treatment. RESULTS: Three patients bled from diverticula located at the second portion of the duodenum, and 4 patients bled from that located at the third portion. In 6 of 7 patients, lesions were identified and treated endoscopically with hemoclips, hypertonic saline solution and epinephrine (HSE), and/or 1% polidocanol injection. In 1 case, the lesion could not be detected during the first endoscopic examination, and the patient, therefore, was treated with transarterial embolization followed by surgical resection. LIMITATIONS: This preliminary case series described the feasibility of the endoscopic treatment. However, optimal management, including angiography and/or surgery, should be individualized to the patients, location, and type of hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding from a duodenal diverticulum should be considered in the case of upper-GI bleeding of unknown origin. An endoscopy may be an effective alternative to surgery in the management of a bleeding duodenal diverticulum.

Ectopic varices rupture in the gastroduodenal anastomosis successfully treated with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection.

The term "ectopic varices" is used to describe dilated portosystemic collateral veins in unusual locations other than the gastroesophageal region. We recently experienced a rare case of ectopic varices that developed in the gastroduodenal anastomosis after subtotal gastrectomy. A 70-year-old male with liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus infection was admitted for hematemesis and tarry stool. He had received a subtotal gastrectomy with the Billroth-I method for gastric ulcer at 46 years of age. Although emergency endoscopy revealed esophageal and gastric fundal varices, there were no obvious bleeding points. After removal of the coagula, ectopic varices and a fibrin plug were observed on the gastroduodenal anastomosis. During the observation, blood began to spurt from the fibrin plug. N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate with lipiodol injection succeeded in hemostasis. Splenic angiography showed gastric varices feeding from a short gastric vein and the posterior gastric vein. The blood flow around the bleeding point, as indicated by lipiodol deposition, had decreased, and no feeding vein was observed. Endoscopic and angiographic findings are shown and the treatment for such lesions is discussed.

Laparoscopic-assisted partial ileectomy for crohn's disease associated with chronic anemia due to frequent hemorrhage.

Crohn's disease can involve any part of the gastrointestinal tract. Although good conservative treatment is given as soon as possible, most patients with this disease will eventually require surgery. We encountered a case of Crohn's disease associated with anemia which we treated with laparoscopic-assisted ileectomy. The postoperative course was satisfactory. The most important characteristic of Crohn's disease, fat wrapping and extending over the serosal surface toward the antimesenteric border, was observed in the ileum, distinguishing the disease and pinpointing the lesion accurately. This surgical method has an advantage over open surgery in that the recovery time is shorter and incisions are smaller, allowing easier surgery in the future, shortening the patient's hospital stay, and improving the patient's quality of life.