ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Benzodiazepine anxiolytics are believed to cause urination disorders due to their anticholinergic effects. OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to investigate the potential inhibitory effects of 15 clinically available anxiolytics in Japan on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced contractions in rat detrusor smooth muscle (DSM) to predict whether these anxiolytics could induce urination disorders. METHODS: -Effects of anxiolytics on contractions induced by ACh and 80 mmol/L KCl solution in rat DSM and effects of anxiolytics on specific binding of [N-methyl-3H]scopolamine ([3H]NMS) in mouse cerebral cortex were investigated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: ACh-induced contractions in rat DSM were inhibited by clotiazepam and diazepam (benzodiazepine anxiolytics) at concentrations that were clinically relevant. These contractions were also significantly inhibited by paroxetine, escitalopram (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors -[SSRIs]), and hydroxyzine (a histamine H1 receptor antagonist), albeit at concentrations that substantially exceeded clinically achievable blood levels. At a concentration of 10-5 mol/L, paroxetine, escitalopram, and hydroxyzine inhibited 80 mmol/L high-KCl solution-induced rat DSM contractions but not clotiazepam and diazepam. Paroxetine, escitalopram, and hydroxyzine also inhibited specific binding of [3H]NMS in mouse cerebral cortex but clotiazepam and diazepam did not. In contrast to the effects of the abovementioned anxiolytics, ACh-induced contractions were not significantly affected by tofisopam, alprazolam, lorazepam, bromazepam, oxazolam, chlordiazepoxide, clonazepam, ethyl loflazepate (benzodiazepine anxiolytics), fluvoxamine (an SSRI), or tandospirone (a serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist). These findings suggest that most clinically used anxiolytics are not likely to result in anticholinergic-induced urination disorders within their clinically achievable blood concentration ranges. However, clotiazepam and diazepam may induce urination disorders within their clinical dose ranges via nonanticholinergic inhibition of DSM contractility.
Subject(s)
Acetylcholine/antagonists & inhibitors , Anti-Anxiety Agents/toxicity , Benzodiazepines/toxicity , Muscle Contraction/drug effects , Muscle, Smooth/drug effects , Urinary Bladder/drug effects , Animals , Male , Mice , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Muscle, Smooth/physiology , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Scopolamine Derivatives/metabolism , Urinary Bladder/physiology , Urination Disorders/chemically inducedABSTRACT
Antipsychotics are often the first-line treatment for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. However, the potential anticholinergic effects of antipsychotics could counteract the therapeutic effects of cholinesterase inhibitors used to treat dementia. We investigated the inhibitory effects of 26 antipsychotics on [N-Methyl-3H]scopolamine specific binding in mouse cerebral cortex. At 10-5 M, chlorpromazine, levomepromazine, prochlorperazine, timiperone, zotepine, pimozide, blonanserin, olanzapine, quetiapine, and clozapine inhibited [N-Methyl-3H]scopolamine binding by > 45%. Furthermore, the pKi values of chlorpromazine, levomepromazine, zotepine, olanzapine, and clozapine overlapped with their clinically achievable blood concentrations. Therefore, the anticholinergic properties of these antipsychotics could attenuate the effects of cholinesterase inhibitors.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/metabolism , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacology , Cerebral Cortex/metabolism , Cholinergic Antagonists/metabolism , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/metabolism , Receptors, Muscarinic/metabolism , Scopolamine/metabolism , Animals , Chlorpromazine/pharmacology , Depression, Chemical , Drug Interactions , Male , Methotrimeprazine/pharmacology , Mice, Inbred Strains , Prochlorperazine/pharmacology , Protein BindingABSTRACT
The present study aimed to investigate the potential inhibitory effects of 21 clinically available hypnotics on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced contractions in rat urinary bladder smooth muscle (UBSM) in order to predict whether these hypnotics could induce voiding impairment. ACh-induced contraction in rat UBSM was inhibited only by diphenhydramine (a histamine H1 receptor antagonist) at a concentration that was clinically relevant. ACh-induced contraction was also significantly inhibited by flurazepam (a benzodiazepine hypnotic) and suvorexant (an orexin receptor antagonist), albeit at concentrations that substantially exceeded clinically achievable blood levels. These three drugs (at 10-5 M) also inhibited high-KCl (80 mM) Locke-Ringer solution-induced contractions. In contrast to the effects of the abovementioned hypnotics, ACh-induced contractions were not significantly affected by triazolam, etizolam, brotizolam, lormetazepam, estazolam, flunitrazepam, nitrazepam (benzodiazepine hypnotics), thiopental, thiamylal, pentobarbital, amobarbital, secobarbital, phenobarbital (barbiturate hypnotics), zolpidem (an imidazopyridine hypnotic), zopiclone (a cyclopyrrolone hypnotic), ramelteon (a melatonin receptor agonist), bromovalerylurea, and chloral hydrate. These findings suggest that most clinically used hypnotics are not likely to result in anticholinergic-induced dysuria within their clinically achievable blood concentration ranges. Diphenhydramine may, however, induce voiding impairment, an action attributable to diminished UBSM contractility within its clinical dose range.
