1.
Psychiatr Serv
; 59(10): 1218-9, 2008 Oct.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-18832513
2.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry
; 28(5): 431-3, 2006.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-16950380
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Chemical restraint is controversial. Appropriate use is ill-defined and chemical restraint may be overutilized. During the period of an unrelated observational study for patients with acute psychomotor agitation in a psychiatric emergency service, we noticed a significant reduction in the number of involuntary intramuscular injections administered. RESULTS: We observed a 27% decrease (P=.015) in the number of involuntary intramuscular injections in the 3-month observational study period, compared to 3-month periods before and after the study. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the observation process itself may have been beneficial and may have reduced the incidence of unnecessary intramuscular injections.