Effect of eicosapentaenoic acid on central systolic blood pressure.

Central systolic blood pressure (C-SBP) has been shown to be a better predictor of cardiovascular risk than brachial SBP. In this study, the effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) on C-SBP were compared with pravastatin. Twenty-four patients with hyperlipidemia were assigned 13 to receive 1800 mg/day EPA (EPA group) and 11 to receive 10 mg/day pravastatin (pravastatin group) for 3 months. In the EPA group, there were no changes in the LDL-cholesterol level. However, the radial augmentation index (AI) and C-SBP decreased after treatment by 5.7% (p < 0.01) and 8.7% (p < 0.001), respectively. Moreover, systolic and diastolic brachial BPs decreased by 7.1% and 8.0%, respectively (p < 0.01 for both). In the pravastatin group, the LDL-cholesterol level decreased by 29.5% (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant changes in brachial BP, AI and C-SBP between. These results suggested that EPA but not pravastatin may reduce cardiac afterload by reducing vascular reflected waves and lowering C-SBP.

Effects of Val-Pro-Pro and Ile-Pro-Pro on nondipper patients: a preliminary study.

Much clinical evidence on the antihypertensive effects of the milk-derived antihypertensive peptides Val-Pro-Pro and Ile-Pro-Pro (lactotripeptides) has been reported. However, circadian rhythm effects determined by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) to eliminate the confounding influence of the white-coat effect have not been fully studied. Twelve hypertensive patients not receiving antihypertensive medication (2 men, 10 women; mean age±standard deviation, 63.5±8.3 years) who had been visiting our clinic for more than 1 year participated in this study. Mean (±standard deviation) systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 142.4±2.6 and 83.5±6.4 mm Hg, respectively, at the first office visit. After patients ingested a fermented milk product containing antihypertensive peptides (2.53 mg Val-Pro-Pro; 1.52 mg Ile-Pro-Pro) for more than 4 weeks, both office SBP and DBP were significantly reduced to a mean (±standard deviation) of 133.3±7.0 mm Hg and 76.5±8.4 mm Hg (P<.001 and P<.005 by paired t-test), respectively. The 24-hour SBP and DBP determined by ABPM were reduced from 127.3±2.4 and 78.7±2.3 mm Hg to 120.2±2.4 and 75.0±2.2 mm Hg (P<.001 and P<.05), respectively. Awake-time SBP (08:00-21:00), night-time SBP (0:00-05:00), and early-morning SBP (06:00-07:00) were reduced from 130.9±2.4 to 123.3±2.3 mm Hg, 118.7±2.9 to 113.2±3.4 mm Hg, and 132.8±4.3 to 122.4±3.9 mm Hg (by paired t-test: P<.001, P<.05, and P<.05), respectively. As seen with DBP measured by ABPM, 24-hour DBP and awake-time DBP were significantly reduced from 78.7±2.3 to 75.0±2.2 mm Hg and 82.1±2.5 to 77.3±2.2 mm Hg (P<.05 and P<.01), respectively. Office BP and 24-hour blood pressure did not significantly differ between the dipper and nondipper groups at baseline. However, after treatment, night-time and early-morning blood pressure were significantly reduced from baseline in the nondipper group (-8.5±2.5 and -15.6±3.7 mm Hg; P<.05 and P<.01, respectively) but not in the dipper group (-2.5±3.6 and -1.2±4.7 mm Hg; P not significant), and the reduction in early-morning blood pressure significantly differed between the groups (P<.05). These results suggest that Val-Pro-Pro and Ile-Pro-Pro decrease blood pressure in patients with stage I hypertension and result not only in lower blood pressure at night-time but also in lower early-morning SBP in nondipper patients.

Do eicosapentaenoic acid supplements attenuate age-related increases in arterial stiffness in patients with dyslipidemia?: A preliminary study.

The present study was conducted to examine the effect of eicosapentaenoic acid supplements on pulse wave velocity (PWV) in patients with dyslipidemia as a prospective open-labeled study. Eicosapentaenoic acid supplements (1,800 mg/day) were prescribed to 40 patients, and diet therapy in consultation with a nutritionist was conducted in 44 patients as a control group. These interventions were continued for 12 months, and PWV and blood examinations were performed at the start and end of these interventions. PWV increased in the control group but not in the eicosapentaenoic acid group. After adjustment for age, gender, the initial PWV, and the changes in mean blood pressure during the study period, a general linear model univariate analysis post hoc comparison demonstrated that the change in PWV during the period of study was significantly larger in the control group (42 +/- 20 cm/s) than in the eicosapentaenoic acid group (-9 +/- 19 cm/s) (p<0.05). Thus, this preliminary study suggested that eicosapentaenoic acid supplements attenuate age-related increases in arterial stiffness in patients with dyslipidemia. A further study with a larger number of subjects is proposed to confirm this beneficial effect of eicosapentaenoic acid supplements on arterial stiffness.