Comparison of long term clinical outcomes, event free survival rates of patients undergoing enhanced external counterpulsation for coronary artery disease in the United States and Turkey.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the long-term efficacy of EECP (Enhanced External Counterpulsation) in Turkish (TR) patients initially and compared these results with the United States (US) in a real world setting. STUDY DESIGN: In this study, 2072 patients were treated and followed in the US and 82 patients were treated and followed in TR. The International EECP Patient Registry Phase I and II was initiated and coordinated at the University of Pittsburgh. The aim of the "registry" was to assess the outcomes of clinical trials in a real world setting. Another unique feature of this study was to enroll patients not only from university hospitals but also from private hospitals, educational hospitals, and treatment centers. RESULTS: TR patients had less diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia than US patients (p<0.01). TR patients also had a higher proportion of diastolic augmentation (p<0.001). Both groups showed a significant reduction in the severity of angina after a 35 h EECP course (p<0.001). Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) rate (death, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, myocardial infarction) was low in both groups during treatment (2.5% vs. 2.7%). At 1 year follow up, 84% of TR and 76% of US patients had maintained the improvement of angina. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting for EECP treatment from TR had different baseline profiles from US patients. However, despite the high risk baseline characteristics, both cohorts achieved similar reduction in angina. In the long term follow-up, the MACE rate was low and the improvement after EECP was sustained in most of the patients.

Discrete supravalvular aortic stenosis in children: Is it necessary to reconstruct the whole aortic root?

OBJECTIVE: Discrete supravalvular aortic stenosis (SAS) is known to involve the whole aortic root. Some surgeons have therefore changed their approach from relief of obstruction using a single-patch to symmetric reconstruction of the whole aortic root - three-patch technique. The advantages are said to be preserved long-term aortic valve function and allowance for growth. This is unproven. We compare growth and aortic root geometry in patients who have undergone relief of discrete SAS using either single-or three-patch technique. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (14 male, 11 female, mean age of 11+/-4 years, range 4-18) underwent surgery for discrete SAS. No patients with diffuse SAS were included in this retrospective analysis. Twelve patients had features of Williams syndrome. Five patients had other concomitant procedures. A single-patch was inserted into the longitudinal incision, which passed across the stenosis into the non-coronary sinus in 14. A three-patch technique was used in 11 patients. Changes in aortic root following repair were documented in patients using both echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: There were no operative deaths. The mean preoperative gradient was 66+/-17 mmHg (range 50-100 mmHg), which decreased to 14+/-7 mmHg (range 4-18 mmHg) early postoperatively. The late mean gradient was 15+/-5 mmHg. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative aortic regurgitation or gradient across the repair between two techniques according to the echocardiograms and MRI findings. CONCLUSION: According to our study, we cannot demonstrate any benefit in reconstructing the whole aortic root for discrete SAS. A single-patch technique is easy, safe and appears durable.