Short-Term Impact of Recycling-Derived Fertilizers on Their P Supply for Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne).

Various nutrient recycling technologies are currently under development in order to alleviate the dependency of non-renewable raw material for the production of mineral phosphorus fertilizers commonly used in agriculture. The resulting products, such as struvites and ashes, need to be assessed for their application as so-called recycling-derived fertilizers (RDFs) in the agricultural sector prior to commercialization. Here, we conducted a short-term (54 days) trial to investigate the impact of different phosphorus fertilizers on plant growth and the soil P cycling microbiota. Lolium perenne was grown with application of superphosphate (SP) as inorganic fertilizer, two ashes (poultry litter ash (PLA) and sewage sludge ash (SSA)), and two struvites (municipal wastewater struvite (MWS) and commercial CrystalGreen® (CGS)) applied at 20 and 60 kg P ha-1 in four replicates. A P-free control (SP0) was also included in the trial. Struvite application increased plant dry weights, and available P acid phosphatase activity was significantly improved for struvites at the high P application rate. The ash RDFs showed a liming effect at 60 kg P ha-1, and PLA60 negatively affected acid phosphatase activity, while PLA20 had significantly lower phoD copy numbers. P mobilization from phosphonates and phytates was not affected. TCP solubilization was negatively affected by mineral SP fertilizer application at both P concentrations. The bacterial (16S and phoD) communities were only marginally affected by the tested P fertilizers. Overall, struvites appeared to be a suitable substitute for superphosphate fertilization for Irish L. perenne pastures.

Design and Construction of Repacked Soil Columns for Measuring Solute Transport, Plant Growth and Soil Biota.

Researchers face a number of challenges in the construction of soil columns which can affect the outcome of their experiments. The use of intact soil cores closely mimics actual field conditions. However, the excavation of large intact soil cores is a time-consuming, labor-intensive process and may lead to soil compaction that would influence the solute transport behavior of the soil column. Repacked soil columns are used as an option to circumvent these challenges of intact soil cores. However, repacked soil columns also have their limitations and introduce other challenges. Here, we present a step by step procedure for the design of repacked soil columns to achieve a realistic bulk density, prevent preferential flow paths, and ensure hydraulic connectivity between soil layers. This protocol will be beneficial to Soil Scientists, Hydrologists and other Environmental Scientists utilizing repacked soil columns.

Sulfate fertilization supports growth of ryegrass in soil columns but changes microbial community structures and reduces abundances of nematodes and arbuscular mycorrhiza.

The increased use of sulfate fertilizers to compensate for soil sulphur (S) limitation in agricultural soils may affect soil microbes and micro-fauna involved in S mobilization. Here, columns with podzolic soil material and ryegrass (Lolium perenne) were fertilized with 0, 5, 10 and 20 kg ha-1 (S0/S5/S10/S20) inorganic sulfate-S alongside a full complement of other nutrients. In the S10 and S20 columns, significantly higher amounts of sulfate were present in soil solution. After two grass cuts (14 weeks in total), there was a significant decrease in arylsulfatase activity, bacterial-feeding nematode abundances and mycorrhizal colonization in the S10 and S20 columns compared to the S0. Bacterial, fungal and AM community structures shifted significantly across the treatments. After final harvest, the S10 and S20 columns had significantly higher grass dry matter yield and uptake of S, N, K, Ca and Mg compared to the S0. While the overall bacterial diversity was reduced in the S20 treatment, abundance (asfA) and diversity (ssuD and atsA) of bacterial genes involved in S cycling were not significantly affected by one-time sulfate fertilization. These results indicate that short-term sulfate fertilization benefits to plant growth outweighed the negative feedback from parts of the soil biota. To improve nutrient use efficiencies in a sustainable manner, future studies should consider alternative S fertilizers which may be beneficial to both, the soil biota and plants in the long-term.

One-time phosphate fertilizer application to grassland columns modifies the soil microbiota and limits its role in ecosystem services.

This study evaluated the effect of one-time phosphate fertilization on the soil microbiota, its cycling of phosphorus (P) and grass growth. Soil columns were established in a greenhouse using a P-limited Irish soil (index 1), planted with Lolium perenne and fertilized with 0 (control), 5 (quarter), 10 (half) and 20 (full)kgPha-1 as inorganic phosphate. Only traces of phosphate in soil solution were detected over the 14week experiment, even after phosphate fertilization. Grass dry matter yield between treatments was not significantly different. Full phosphate fertilization significantly reduced the arbuscular mycorrhization (AM) rate, bacterial- and fungal-feeding nematode population, bacterial phoD gene abundance, but increased alkaline and acid phosphatase activities at the time of harvest. Full and half P treatments significantly shifted the bacterial, fungal and AM community structures compared to the control. Furthermore, the control had a significantly higher relative abundance of bacterial genera including Bacillus, Bradyrhizobium, Paenibacillus, Nocardioides and Balneimonas, that have been associated with P mobilization in the past, when compared to the full phosphate treatment. These results suggest that a positive effect of a single phosphate application on plant growth in a soil can be cancelled out by its negative effect on the soil microbiota and their ecosystem services.