Migraine in physicians and final year medical students: A cross-sectional insight into prevalence, self-awareness, and knowledge from Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: Despite its high prevalence, migraine remains underdiagnosed worldwide. A significant reason is the knowledge gap in physicians regarding diagnostic criteria, clinical features, and other clinical aspects of migraine. AIM: To measure the knowledge deficit in physicians and medical students and to assess the prevalence of migraine in the same population. METHODS: An online questionnaire was developed and distributed among physicians and final year medical students on duty in various medical and surgical specialties of Allied and DHQ Hospitals, Faisalabad, between October 2018 and October 2019. Inclusion criteria were public practicing physicians who experience headaches, while those who never experienced headaches were excluded. Different questions assessed respondents on their knowledge of triggers, diagnosis, management, and prophylaxis of the migraine headache. They were asked to diagnose themselves using embedded ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria for different types of migraine. Graphs, tables, and figures were made using Microsoft Office 2016 and Microsoft Visio, and data analysis was done in R Studio 1.4. RESULTS: We had 213 respondents and 175 fulfilled inclusion criteria, with 99 (52%), 58 (30%) and 12 (6.3%) belonging to specialties of medicine, surgery, and others, respectively. Both genders were symmetrically represented (88 male and 87 female). Fifty-two (24.4%) of our 213 respondents were diagnosed with migraine, with 26 (50%) being aware of it. Females had higher prevalence among study participants (n = 28, 32.2%) compared to males (n = 20, 22.7%, P = 0.19). A majority (62%) of subjects never consulted any doctor for their headache. Similarly, a majority (62%) either never heard or did not remember the diagnostic criteria of migraine. Around 38% falsely believed that having any type of aura is essential for diagnosing migraine. The consultation rate was 37% (n = 65), and migraineurs were significantly more likely to have consulted a doctor, and a neurologist in particular (P < 0.001). Consulters and migraineurs fared better in the knowledge of diagnostic aspects of the disease than their counterparts. There was no significant difference in other knowledge aspects between consulters versus non-consulters and migraineurs versus non-migraineurs. CONCLUSION: Critical knowledge gaps exist between physicians and medical students, potentially contributing to misdiagnosis and mismanagement of migraine.

Optimal management, prevalence, and clinical behavior of saddle pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The central location, size, and instability of saddle pulmonary embolism (SPE) have raised significant concerns regarding its clinical, hemodynamic effects as well as optimal management. Pulmonary embolism (PE) guidelines barely address such concerns. We aimed to pool the available data on the clinical behavior and outcomes of SPE and study the effects of various treatment modalities on mortality outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for articles (any date up to February 28, 2022) reporting patients with SPE. Data on SPE demographics, clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Results from all SPE cases: A total of 5251 patients from 194 studies were included in the review. Dyspnea (57 %) was the most prevalent symptom. Massive and submassive PE comprised 9.7 % and 45.8% of cases, respectively. Thrombolytic therapy (TT) was administered in 18.1 %, and thrombectomy was performed in 16 % of cases. SPE-related mortality was observed in 4.6 %, late decompensation in 9.5 %, and PE recurrence in 4.5 % of cases. Female sex (61.5 % vs. 41.3 %, p = 0.019), hypoxemia (90 % vs. 59.2 %, p < 0.001), massive PE features (89.7 % vs. 30.1 %, p < 0.001), associated chronic kidney disease (CKD) (10.3 % vs. 1.4 %, p = 0.002), and the need for mechanical ventilation (28.2 % vs. 13.1 %, p = 0.02) were significantly associated with increased mortality. The use of TT was significantly associated with increased survival (27.1 % vs. 12.5 %, p < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression model, massive PE features significantly increased the odds of death (OR: 29.3, CI: 4.86-181.81, p < 0.001), whereas, treatment with anticoagulation (AC) alone (OR: 0.1, CI: 0.027-0.356, p < 0.001), TT (OR: 0.065, CI: 0.019-0.26, p < 0.001), surgical thrombectomy (ST) (OR: 0.047, CI: (0.010-0.23), p < 0.001), or percutaneous thrombectomy (PT) (OR: 0.12, CI: 0.020-0.84, p = 0.032) significantly decreased odds of death. Results from a meta-analysis of observational studies: Meta-analysis of the included 17 observational studies revealed an overall 10 % (95 % CI: 4.56-16.89) SPE prevalence among all PE cases. The overall SPE-related mortality rate was 8 % (95 % CI: 5.26-10.96). Massive PE was observed in 13.3 % (95 % CI: 5.56-23.70), PE recurrence in 5.1 % (95 % CI: 2.22-9.05), and late decompensation in 11 % (95 % CI: 3.43-22.34) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: SPE comprises 10 % of all PE cases. Despite its ominous radiologic appearance, the clinical, hemodynamic, and mortality outcomes of SPE seem comparable to that of other PE types in general. The presence of massive PE features is the main predictor of mortality in SPE patients. AC, TT, ST, and PT are all associated with decreased odds of death from SPE.

The head that wears the crown: Henry VIII and traumatic brain injury.

Henry VIII of England is one of the most controversial figures in European history. He was born on 28 June 1491 as the second son of Henry VII and Elizabeth of York and became the heir to the English throne after his elder brother died prematurely. A contradictory picture of Henry's character emerges from history: the young Henry was a vigorous, generous and intelligent king who saw early military and naval successes. In contrast, in his later years he became cruel, petty and tyrannical. His political paranoia and military misjudgements are in direct contrast to his earlier successes and promise. Several hypotheses have been put forward regarding his transformation from a renaissance king to a later medieval tyrant, including endocrinopathies, psychiatric illnesses and traumatic brain injury. In this paper we examine the historical evidence linking the change in Henry's personality and health problems to traumatic brain injury. To our knowledge this is the first systematic neurological study of traumatic brain injury in Henry VIII.