Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Environ Monit Assess ; 195(5): 620, 2023 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37106210

ABSTRACT

The current study analyzed and interpreted airborne radiometric data from Ilesha's basement complex rock and its surroundings. At the surface, the concentrations of the most frequent primordial radionuclides notably K, elemental concentration of uranium eU, and elemental concentration of thorium eTh were measured. The weighted mean elemental and activity concentrations were 0.85%, 2.75 ppm, 10.22 ppm, and 267.54 Bq kg-1, 34.41 Bq kg-1, 41.51 Bq kg-1 for 40 K, 238U, and 232Th, respectively. The low concentration of 40 K was certainly due to the effects of weathering, kaolinization of granites, and pedogenesis activities. The abundance of uranium was ascribed to the availability of uranium minerals such as allanite, apatite, and sphene with accessories minerals, while that of thorium was due to minerals such as cheralite, thorite, uranothorite, thorianite, and uranothorianite with accessories minerals. The RPHR weighted mean 1.48 µWm-3 compared to the earth's crust mean between 0.8 and1.2 µWm-3 was higher due to significant presence of gneiss rocks in all the studied profiles. Radiological hazard, in particular, dose rates, external hazard index, internal hazard index, radium equivalent, annual gonadal dose, effective dose dispensed to various organs of the body were computed to determine the deleterious effects of rocks in the area. The weighted means of annual gonadal dose of 363.98 µSv y-1 and outdoor 0.91 × 10×3 and indoor 1.65 × 10-3 excessive life cancer risks were more than the global average 300 µSv y-1, 0.29 × 10-3 and 1.16 × 10-3. As a result, proper surveillance is required in the area in order to prevent epidemics occurrence in future.


Subject(s)
Radiation Monitoring , Radium , Soil Pollutants, Radioactive , Uranium , Environmental Monitoring , Thorium/analysis , Uranium/analysis , Radioisotopes/analysis , Minerals/analysis , Radium/analysis , Potassium Radioisotopes/analysis , Soil Pollutants, Radioactive/analysis , Spectrometry, Gamma , Background Radiation
2.
Heliyon ; 5(6): e01844, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31194128

ABSTRACT

The limitation of ionospheric models in describing short-term ionospheric events has led to the development of data assimilative models e.g. the International Reference Ionosphere extended to Plasmasphere (IRI-Plas) model. This paper compares the IRI-Plas derived total electron content (TEC), the peak height (hmF2) and critical frequency (foF2) of the F2-layer with those obtained from Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver's and Digisonde Precision Sounder (DPS-4) measurements over Ilorin (Geog. Lat. 8.50oN; Long. 4.50oE, dip: - 7.9o) during geomagnetic storm days. The model estimation was done by assimilation of Ionosonde foF2 and TEC derived from GPS (GPS-TEC) and Global Ionospheric Map (GIM-TEC) into the model code. In order to study the effect of data assimilation on the model's representation, the "no input" option of the model was used as reference. The result shows that with the exception of the foF2 assimilation mode, all the options generally reproduced TEC quite well for all the storm days considered. Overall, the model adjusted with GPS-TEC gives the best prediction of TEC as it reduced the prediction error of TEC by a multiple of up to three compared to using the GIM-TEC. Also, all the options failed to reproduce the storm induced prominent features in the storm-time features of foF2 and hmF2. In other word, assimilation with the TEC does not generally improve the storm-time predictions of foF2 and hmF2 at the station. Consequently, for storm-time estimation of the F2-layer peak parameters, the 'no input' representation of the model is more valid at this station.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...