ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess survivor and parent perceptions of the long-term survivor visit and preferences regarding accessing health information, survivorship education, and support networks in rural and metropolitan regions of Texas. METHODS: Leveraging the multi-institutional Survivorship and Access to Care for Latinos to Understand Disparities (SALUD) cohort, we administered a 26-item bilingual survey to adult survivors of childhood cancer and parents of younger survivors. Characteristics and responses were compared between survivors vs. parents and Latinos vs. non-Latinos using a t test or Fisher exact test. Odds ratios for the outcomes of interest were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: We received 138 responses from 59 survivors and 79 parents of survivors treated at three Texas pediatric cancer hospitals/clinics. Parents were more likely than survivors to seek survivorship information from other survivors or parents of survivors (OR=6.32, 95% CI 1.78, 22.47), and non-Latinos preferred social media as an educational resource (OR=3.70, CI 1.58, 8.68). Survivors, particularly Latino survivors, preferred short videos as a mode of survivorship education delivery. Highest topic priorities for survivorship education were 'risk for second cancers' and 'diet, nutrition, and exercise.' All parents and survivors who rated survivor physical and mental health as 'fair' or 'poor' identified as Latino. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight differences in perceived health status between Latino and non-Latino survivors and support the development of adapted survivorship education content to address the specific needs of Latino survivors. Implications for Cancer Survivors Results of this study suggest a need for survivorship educational materials in multiple formats and that are tailored to the style, content, language preferences, and health literacy status of the target population.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Children with hematologic malignancies, especially those who receive intensive chemotherapy, are at high risk for invasive mold infections (IMI) that confer substantial mortality. Randomized controlled trials support the use of antifungal prophylaxis with antimold activity as an optimal strategy for risk reduction in this population, but studies outlining the practical application of evidence-based recommendations are lacking. PROCEDURE: We conducted a 15-year, single-institution retrospective review in a diverse cohort of children with hematologic malignancies treated with chemotherapy to determine the incidence of proven or probable IMI diagnosed between 2006 and 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify host and disease factors associated with IMI risk. We then compared the incidence and type of IMI and related factors before and after 2016 implementation of an evidence-based, risk-adapted antifungal prophylaxis algorithm that broadened coverage to include molds in patients at highest risk for IMI. RESULTS: We identified 61 cases of proven or probable IMI in 1456 patients diagnosed with hematologic malignancies during the study period (4.2%). Implementation of an antifungal prophylaxis algorithm reduced the IMI incidence in this population from 4.8% to 2.9%. Both Hispanic ethnicity and cancer diagnosis prior to 2016 were associated with risk for IMI. CONCLUSION: An evidence-based, risk-adapted approach to antifungal prophylaxis for children with hematologic malignancies is an effective strategy to reduce incidence of IMI.
