Stimulation of the subthalamic vasodilator area and fastigial nucleus independently protects the brain against focal ischemia.

We investigated whether stimulation of the functionally discrete subthalamic region, subthalamic cerebrovasodilator area (SVA), which increases cerebral blood flow (CBF) when excited, would, like stimulation of cerebellar fastigial nucleus (FN), produce central neurogenic neuroprotection. A 1-h electrical stimulation of SVA or FN reduced infarctions triggered by permanent occlusion of middle cerebral artery (MCA) by 48-55% in Sprague-Dawley rats and by 59% in Fisher rats. The salvaging effect of SVA stimulation, similar to FN, was long lasting and reduced the volume of infarctions placed 72 h or 10 days later by 58 and 26%, respectively, in Fisher rats. Bilateral lesioning of FN neurons by the microinjection of ibotenic acid 5 days before SVA stimulation did not affect SVA-evoked neuroprotection. Bilateral lesions of SVA neurons administered 5 days before FN stimulation had no effect on FN-induced neuroprotection but reversed the stimulus-locked increase in CBF accompanying FN stimulation. This study demonstrates that (1) excitation of neurons and/or fibers projecting through the SVA reduces ischemic infarctions as substantially as excitation of FN neurons; (2) the effects are long-lasting and not attributable to increases in cerebral blood flow, changes in blood gases or brain temperature, or rat strain; (3) the neuroprotective effects of SVA and FN stimulation are mutually independent and (4) FN-evoked cerebrovasodilation is mediated by SVA neurons. The SVA and FN are part of a neuronal system in CNS, which is distributed and, when excited, acts to protect the brain from ischemic injury.

Hippocampal theta activity and facilitated locomotor stepping produced by GABA injections in the midbrain raphe region.

Inactivation of neurons in the midbrain raphe region produces increases in locomotor activity, and it appears that they function to suppress locomotion. Inactivation of neurons there also produces hippocampal slow wave (theta) activity and it appears that they also function to inhibit rhythmic activity in the hippocampus. We determined whether the degree of association between the two effects was consistent with the operation of a single mechanism. Stimulation electrodes were implanted into locomotor sites of the hypothalamus of 34 urethane-anesthetized rats. Hindlimb stepping was elicited by 5.12-s trains of perifornical electrical stimulation presented once per minute. Hippocampal theta activity was recorded across the CA1 layer of the dorsal hippocampus. GABA injections were used to locate raphe sites at which neuronal inactivation influenced stepping and hippocampal activity. A glass pipette (80-microm tip) was inserted into the midbrain, and injections of GABA (50-100 mg/0.1-0.2 microl) were made in 70 sites in the midbrain. Injections at 34 sites facilitated stimulation-elicited stepping, and at 17 sites, they also produced intertrial stepping. Facilitating injections, but not ineffective or suppressive injections, increased the mean peak frequency of hippocampal activity, and increased power in the 4-5 Hz band during the period that preceded the stimulation trains, but did not change the 5-6 Hz activity produced during the stimulation trains. Priming locomotor stimulation which also facilitated stepping produced generally similar increases in pre-stimulation peak frequency and 4-Hz power. The magnitudes of the increases in stepping and 4-Hz power were uncorrelated. The increase in 4-Hz power appeared earlier than the increase in stepping in 18 of 34 cases, and later in 11 cases; no increases in 4-Hz power were apparent in five cases. The results indicate that pre-locomotor 4-Hz hippocampal activity in the urethane-anesthetized rat is loosely coupled with facilitated locomotor initiation. Neurons in the midbrain raphe region appear to suppress both processes, but the low degree of association between the magnitudes and onset times of increases in stepping and hippocampal 4-Hz power indicate the operation of multiple mechanisms.

Locomotion and head scanning initiated by hypothalamic stimulation are inversely related.

Stimulation in the hypothalamus elicits locomotor stepping. Before stepping is initiated, head scanning movements occur. We determined the relationships between the latency of locomotor initiation and the number, extent and direction of the head scanning movements. Chronic stimulation electrodes were stereotaxically implanted in and around the hypothalamus of 29 rats. Under awake conditions, 38 locomotor sites were tested in a runway apparatus. Behaviors occurring between the onset of stimulation and the first step were recorded on videotape. Points on the rat were digitized at sampling rate of 6 Hz to produce measures of head angles in the vertical, horizontal, and sagittal planes. The priming paradigm was used with a current selected for each site that was minimally sufficient to produce reliable stepping. In trials at approximately 1-min intervals, a 5-s train of stimulation (the control) was followed by a second train (the test) delivered 5-20 s later. Initiation latency on control trains was strongly correlated with head movement measures. Vertical and lateral head movements were independent of one another. Together, their frequency and extent accounted for 85% of the variance in locomotor initiation latencies. In effective priming trials, when locomotor initiation latencies were reduced on the test train, the frequency and extent of vertical and lateral head movements were also reduced. In non-effective priming trials, when latencies were not reduced, head movements were not reduced. Head scanning and locomotor initiation reflect reciprocal processes.