Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Ter Arkh ; 94(8): 985-991, 2022 Oct 12.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36286979

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the advantages of using combined therapy of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and esophagoprotector in comparison with basic therapy of PPIs for 4 weeks based on the results of changes in the endoscopic picture.To compare the effectiveness of 4-week PPI therapy and 4-week combination therapy with PPI and esophagoprotector Alfasoxx (sodium hyaluronate, chondroitin sulfate, poloxomer 407) in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) of any degree according to the Los Angeles Endoscopic Classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 81 patients with EE AC according to the Los Angeles endoscopic classification (1994) was enrolled in the study on the basis of the clinic of Peter the Great, Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University. By computer randomization, patients were divided into the control group 40 patients (pantoprazole 40 mg 1 time per day) and the intervention group 41 patients (pantoprazole 40 mg 1 time per day + Alfasoxx 1 sachet qid). The therapy was carried out for 4 weeks. In all patients before and after therapy, the frequency and severity of the main symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were assessed, esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed. RESULTS: The advantage of combination therapy over standard PPI monotherapy in patients with EE was revealed. According to the results of the control endoscopy, healing of erosions of the esophageal mucosa was observed in 39 out of 41 (95.1%) patients in the intervention group and 32 out of 39 (82.1%) in the control group. The proportion of patients who showed an improvement in the endoscopic picture before and after treatment for 4 weeks by at least 1 level according to the Los Angeles classification was significantly higher in the comparison group 41 patients (100%), while in the control group 33 patients (85%); p0.009. After treatment, the combination therapy group had a lower incidence (p0.01) and severity of heartburn (p0.01). The same results are demonstrated by combination therapy regarding the symptom belching of air: in the study group after treatment, this symptom occurred less frequently (p=0.014), its severity was significantly less than in the control group (p0.01). There was a statistically significant decrease in the need for on-demand antacid therapy in the study group. CONCLUSION: In this study involving 81 patients with erosive GERD, the benefits of combination therapy were demonstrated. The addition of Alfasoxx medical device to PPI therapy increases the clinical and endoscopic efficacy of therapy. This positive effect is associated with the esophagoprotective properties of the drug, based on unique pharmacodynamic characteristics. Combination therapy for GERD is preferred in patients with EE. Studies have shown the expediency of using Alfasoxx in case of insufficient effectiveness of classical acid-suppressive therapy for GERD.


Subject(s)
Esophagitis , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Peptic Ulcer , Humans , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pantoprazole/therapeutic use , Antacids/therapeutic use , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Chondroitin Sulfates/therapeutic use , Esophagitis/drug therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Peptic Ulcer/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
2.
Ter Arkh ; 91(2): 16-24, 2019 Feb 15.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32598623

ABSTRACT

The multicenter prospective observational study initiated by the European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG) is conducted in 27 countries in Europe. The data from the Russian part of the European registry for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection (European Registry on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection, protocol: "Hp-EuReg") allows us to analyze the real clinical practice of diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori and compare it with international recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative analysis of the data entered in the register by the Russian research centers "Hp-EuReg", in the period from 2013 to 2018, was conducted. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Invasive diagnostic methods prevail for the primary diagnosis of H. pylori [histology - 20.3% (in 2013 year) - 43.9% (in 2018 year), rapid urease test - 31.7% and 47.8% respectively]. The most popular mode of eradication therapy is a 10-day triple therapy (62.8-76.2%), the effectiveness of which does not exceed 79% (per protocol). Invasive tests (histology) are the leading method for control the effectiveness of therapy, however, there is a tendency towards a wider use of non-invasive methods (H. pylori stool antigen - from 17% in 2013 to 29.3% in 2018 and urea breath test from 6.9 to 18.3%, respectively). Serological test to control the effectiveness of eradication is still used from 8.2% (2013) to 6.1% (2018). Eradication therapy was not performed in 28% of patients throughout the entire observation period. CONCLUSION: In Russia, despite approved domestic and international recommendations, deviations in clinical practice persist, both during eradication therapy and in monitoring the effectiveness of eradication therapy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Antigens, Bacterial/analysis , Breath Tests/methods , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Feces/microbiology , Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter pylori/isolation & purification , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Therapy, Combination/adverse effects , Europe , Helicobacter Infections/epidemiology , Helicobacter pylori/immunology , Humans , Prospective Studies , Registries , Russia/epidemiology
3.
Ter Arkh ; 90(8): 118-124, 2018 Aug 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30701946

ABSTRACT

The following factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) pathogenesis are addressed in the abstract: activation of nociceptors, hyperexpression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and increase of functional activity of immune competent cells. The current classification of GERD is given which is based on identification of 4 phenotypes of the disease according to diagnostic criteria and prognosis of treatment effectiveness. Importance of pH-impedance monitoring in GERD diagnostics is demonstrated based on its primary significance for identification of reflux nature and determination of relationship between GERD symptoms and reflux. The diagnostics criteria of functional heartburn and hypersensitive; oesophagus according to Rome IV criteria (2016) are presented. The data of the private investigation are demonstrated according to which irritated oesophagus was observed in 26.2% of healthy persons and in 24.2% of GERD patients with endoscopic or pH-metric symptoms of the disease. Implication of oesophagus clearance disorder in GERD pathogenesis has been pointed out. An overview of the current literature data about effectiveness of surgical treatment in patients with different GERD phenotypes and also assessment of clinical effectiveness of long-term treatment with PPI are given. Advantages of anti-secretory drug of the last generation rabeprazole in different patient groups and possibilities of its use in all GERD phenotypes have been discussed.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Mucosa/drug effects , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Nociceptive Pain/drug therapy , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Electric Impedance , Esophageal Mucosa/metabolism , Esophageal Mucosa/pathology , Esophageal pH Monitoring , Nociceptors/drug effects , Nociceptors/metabolism , Nociceptors/pathology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...