Assessment of a syndromic surveillance system based on morbidity data: results from the Oscour network during a heat wave.

BACKGROUND: Syndromic surveillance systems have been developed in recent years and are now increasingly used by stakeholders to quickly answer questions and make important decisions. It is therefore essential to evaluate the quality and utility of such systems. This study was designed to assess a syndromic surveillance system based on emergency departments' (ED) morbidity rates related to the health effects of heat waves. This study uses data collected during the 2006 heat wave in France. METHODS: Data recorded from 15 EDs in the Ile-de-France (Paris and surrounding area) from June to August, 2006, were transmitted daily via the Internet to the French Institute for Public Health Surveillance. Items collected included diagnosis (ICD10), outcome, and age. Several aspects of the system have been evaluated (data quality, cost, flexibility, stability, and performance). Periods of heat wave are considered the most suitable time to evaluate the system. RESULTS: Data quality did not vary significantly during the period. Age, gender and outcome were completed in a comprehensive manner. Diagnoses were missing or uninformative for 37.5% of patients. Stability was recorded as being 99.49% for the period overall. The average cost per day over the study period was estimated to be euro287. Diagnoses of hyperthermia, malaise, dehydration, hyponatremia were correlated with increased temperatures. Malaise was most sensitive in younger and elderly adults but also the less specific. However, overall syndrome groups were more sensitive with comparable specificity than individual diagnoses. CONCLUSION: This system satisfactorily detected the health impact of hot days (observed values were higher than expected on more than 90% of days on which a heat alert was issued). Our findings should reassure stakeholders about the reliability of health impact assessments during or following such an event. These evaluations are essential to establish the validity of the results of syndromic surveillance systems.

A major epidemic of chikungunya virus infection on Reunion Island, France, 2005-2006.

In January 2005, an epidemic of chikungunya fever broke out in the Comoro Islands and lasted until May 2005. In April, cases were also reported in Mayotte and Mauritius. On Réunion Island, the first cases were reported at the end of April. Surveillance of this epidemic required an adaptive system, which at first was based on active and retrospective case detection around the cases reported, then relied on a sentinel network when the incidence increased. Emerging and severe forms of infection were investigated. Death certificates were monitored. By April 2006, the surveillance estimate was 244,000 cases of chikungunya virus infection, including 123 severe cases and 41 of maternoneonatal transmission, with an overall attack rate of 35%. Chikungunya infection was mentioned on 203 death certificates and significant mortality was observed. This epidemic highlighted the need for a mutual strategy of providing information on arboviral diseases and their prevention and control between countries in the southwestern Indian Ocean.

A community-wide outbreak of legionnaires disease linked to industrial cooling towers--how far can contaminated aerosols spread?

A community-wide outbreak of legionnaires disease occurred in Pas-de-Calais, France, in November 2003-January 2004. Eighteen (21%) of 86 laboratory-confirmed cases were fatal. A case-control study identified smoking, silicosis, and spending >100 min outdoors daily as risk factors for acquiring the disease. Legionella pneumophila strain Lens was isolated from cooling towers, wastewater, and air samples from plant A. This unique strain matched all 23 clinical isolates, as assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis subtyping. Modeling of atmospheric dispersion of aerosols emitted from plant A cooling towers showed good coverage of the communes where patients lived and showed that the dispersion extended over a distance of at least 6 km from plant A. No other aerosol-producing installation was identified as a plausible source, and no common source of indoor exposure was found. These findings implicate plant A as the most likely outbreak source and suggest that the distance of airborne transmission of L. pneumophila may be greater than previously reported.

[An inter-laboratory study of anti-HCV antibody detection in saliva samples]. / Etude inter-laboratoires de la détection des anticorps anti-VHC sur prélèvements salivaires.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody detection in the saliva samples of 108 drug users in an inter-laboratory study. METHODS: Between January and June 2001, 108 subjects in Lille, Metz and Lens received a test to detect anti-HCV antibodies in their saliva. Two consecutive saliva samples were taken in each subject (Salivette system, Sarstedt). An HCV serology (Axsym HCV 3.0, Abbott) was also performed and serum HCV RNA detection by Amplicor HCV 2.0 (Roche) was performed when HCV serology was positive. Sixty three patients had a negative HCV serology, 45 had a positive HCV serology, and 31 of these had positive HCV RNA as well. Tests for the detection of the anti HCV antibody in saliva samples were performed as a blind study in both the Lille and the Thionville laboratories. RESULTS: The sensitivity of saliva anti-HCV antibody tests was respectively 71% (32/45) and 78% (35/45) in Lille and Thionville. In the event of positive HCV viremia, the sensitivity was respectively 90% (28/31) and 93% (29/31). The specificity was respectively 97% (61/63) and 98.5% (62/63). Results from the two laboratories agreed for 101 saliva tests while discrepancies were found in 7 (Kappa Concordance Coefficient: 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms, in a large, unselected population sample, that anti-HCV antibody detection tests in saliva allow the detection of 90% of viremic HCV-antibody-positive patients with excellent specificity. The simplicity and reproductibility of this technique makes it a precious tool for epidemiological studies.