Androgen Deprivation Therapy/Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitor Treatments for Prostate Cancer: Pathophysiology and Review of Effects on Cardiovascular Disease.

Androgen deprivation therapy is the cornerstone of systemic management for prostate cancer but is associated with multiple adverse effects that must be considered during treatment. These effects occur because of the profound hypogonadism that is induced from lack of testosterone or due to the medications used in the treatment or in combination with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors. This article critically reviews the associations between androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors, and cardiovascular complications such as prolonged QT interval, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral arterial occlusive disease. These unfavorable outcomes reinforce the need for regular cardiovascular screening of patients undergoing androgen deprivation for the management of prostate cancer.

Pulmonary Hypertension Is Associated with Worse Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for Sick Sinus Syndrome.

Sick sinus syndrome (SSS) is a condition of the sinoatrial node that arises from a constellation of aberrant rhythms, resulting in reduced pacemaker activity and impulse transmission. According to the World Health Organization, pulmonary hypertension (PH) is defined by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure of >25 mmHg at rest, measured during right heart catheterization. It can result in right atrial remodeling, which may predispose the patient to sinus node dysfunction. This study sought to estimate the impact of PH on clinical outcomes of hospitalizations with SSS. The U.S. National Inpatient Sample database from 2016-2019 was searched for hospitalized adult patients with SSS as a principal diagnosis with and without PH as a secondary diagnosis using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. The secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI), cardiogenic shock (CS), cardiac arrest, rates of pacemaker insertion, total hospital charges (THCs), and length of stay (LOS). Multivariate regression analysis was used to adjust for confounders. A total of 181,230 patients were admitted for SSS; 8.3% (14,990) had underlying PH. Compared to patients without PH, patients admitted with coexisting PH had a statistically significant increase in mortality (95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.32; P = .002), AKI (P < .001), CS (P = .004), THC (P = .037), and LOS (P < .001). In conclusion, patients admitted primarily for SSS with coexisting PH had a statistically significant increase in mortality, AKI, CS, THC, and LOS. Additional studies geared at identifying and addressing the underlying etiologies for PH in this population may be beneficial in the management of this patient group.

Profile of Childhood Poisoning and Its Outcomes in the United States: A One-Year Nationwide Study of Emergency and Inpatient Admissions.

Childhood poisoning is a prevalent and significant public health issue, with a higher incidence among children under the age of five due to their natural inquisitiveness and impulsive behavior. In order to gain a better understanding of the burden and outcomes of acute poisoning in children, this study utilized data from two comprehensive databases: the 2018 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample and the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample. A total of 257,312 hospital visits were analyzed, with 85.5% being emergency department visits and 14.5% being inpatient admissions. Drug overdose emerged as the most commonly known cause of poisoning in both emergency and inpatient settings. While alcohol poisoning was the predominantly known cause of non-pharmaceutical poisoning in the inpatient setting, household soaps and detergents were more common in the emergency setting. Among the identified pharmaceutical agents, non-opioid analgesics and antibiotics were the most frequently implicated. However, a significant proportion of the poisoning cases were caused by unidentified substances (26.8% in the pharmaceutical group and 72.2% in the non-pharmaceutical group). There were 211 deaths in total and further analysis revealed that patients with higher Charlson indices and hospital stays exceeding seven days were associated with increased likelihood of mortality. Additionally, admission to teaching hospitals or hospitals located in the western region of the country was linked to an increased likelihood of an extended hospital stay.

Increased national mortality in acute myocardial infarction hospitalization during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This retrospective study describes the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on epidemiologic trends and highlights disparities in outcomes among acute myocardial infarction (AMI) hospitalizations. The National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 was searched for hospitalizations of adult patients with AMI as a principal diagnosis using Clinical Classifications Software Refined codes. The admission rate for each calendar year was obtained as admission per 1000 adults hospitalized. The primary outcome was a comparison of inpatient mortality, and the secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and total hospital charge between prepandemic and pandemic years. During the pandemic (2020), the admission rate for AMI was 31.1 admissions per 1000 adults hospitalized compared to 33.4 admissions in 2019 (prepandemic) (P < 0.001). When compared to the prepandemic admissions, those admitted during the pandemic had a lower mean age (66.5 ± 13.2 vs 66.9 ± 13.4, P < 0.001), with more women (36.3% vs 37.3%, P < 0.001). The inpatient mortality during the pandemic was 5.0% compared to 4.5% in 2019 (P < 0.001). Mortality increased 12.0% in women vs 9.5% in men, 13.2% in Blacks vs 8.9% in Whites, and 6.5% in low-income vs 4.3% in high-income household hospitalizations. In conclusion, our study showed a statistically significant reduction in AMI admission rates during the pandemic and an increase in inpatient mortality. There were significant disparities in the increase in mortality across sociodemographic groups.

Impact of Geriatric Events on Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization of Acute Coronary Syndrome Hospitalizations.

Background The effect of geriatric events (GEs) on outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admissions is poorly understood. We evaluated the prevalence and impact of GEs on clinical outcomes and resource utilization of older patients admitted with ACS. Methods Using the 2018 National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample, we analyzed all elective hospitalizations for ACS in older adults (age ≥ 65 years) and a younger reference group (age 55-64). Nationally-weighted descriptive statistics were generated for GEs based on ACS subtypes. Multivariate logistic regression models controlling for comorbidities, frailty, patient procedure, and hospital-level variables were used to estimate the association of age with GEs and GEs with outcomes. Results Out of 403,760 admissions analyzed, 71.9% occurred in older adults (≥65 years). The overall rate of any GE in older adults with ACS was 3.4%. With advancing age, the number of GEs was found to significantly increase (p<0.001). After adjustments, having any GE was found to have a significant impact on mortality (adjusted OR (AOR): 1.32; 95%CI: 1.15-1.54; p < 0.001), post-myocardial infarction (MI) complications (AOR: 1.53; 95%CI: 1.36-1.71; p < 0.001), prolonged hospital stays (AOR: 2.97; 95%CI: 2.56-3.30; p < 0.001), and non-home (acute care and skilled nursing home) discharge (AOR: 1.68; 95%CI: 1.53-1.85; p < 0.001). The occurrence of GEs was also associated with a substantial increase in total hospitalization costs with a mean increase of $48,325.22 ± $5,539 (p < 0.001). A dose-response relationship was established between GEs and all outcomes. Limitations of the study included the use of retrospective data and an administrative database. Conclusion Geriatric events were found to significantly worsen outcomes for older adults with ACS. There is, therefore, a need for increased awareness and effective management of GEs in older adults to improve their health outcomes and reduce the burden on the healthcare system.

Racial Disparities in Patients With COVID-19 Infection: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis.

Introduction Evidence suggests the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic highlighted well-known healthcare disparities. This study investigated racial disparities in patients with COVID-19-related hospitalizations utilizing the US (United States) National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Methodology This was a retrospective study conducted utilizing the NIS 2020 database. The NIS was searched for hospitalization of adult patients with COVID-19 infection as a principal diagnosis using ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) codes. We divided the NIS into four major racial/ethnic groups: White, Black, Hispanic, and others. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality, and the secondary outcomes were the mean length of stay, mean total hospital charges, development of sepsis, septic shock, use of vasopressors, acute respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney failure, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accident, and need for mechanical ventilation. Results Compared to White patients, Hispanic patients had higher adjusted inpatient mortality odds (aOR [adjusted odds ratio]: 1.25, 95% CI 1.19-1.33, p<0.001); however, Black patients had similar adjusted mortality odds (aOR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.91-1.01, p=0.212). Black patients and Hispanic patients had a higher mean length of stay (8.01 vs 7.13 days, p<0.001 and 7.67 vs 7.13 days, p<0.001, respectively), adjusted odds of cardiac arrest (aOR: 1.53, 95% CI 1.37-1.71, p<0.001 and aOR: 1.73, 95% CI 1.54-1.94, p<0.001), septic shock (aOR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.13-1.33, p<0.001 and aOR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.73-2.04, p<0.001), and vasopressor use (aOR: 1.32, 95% CI 1.14 - 1.53, p<0.001 and aOR: 1.87, 95% CI 1.62 - 2.16, p<0.001). Conclusion Our study showed that Black and Hispanic patients are at higher risk of adverse outcomes compared to White patients admitted with COVID-19 infection.

Weekend Effect on Mortality, Access to Renal Replacement Therapy, and Other Outcomes Among Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Retrospective Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: A large body of research has been conducted on the "weekend effect," which is the reportedly increased risk of adverse outcomes for patients admitted to the hospital on weekends versus those admitted on weekdays. This effect has been researched in numerous patient populations, including sub-populations of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, with varying conclusions. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether differences in in-hospital mortality, access to renal replacement therapy (RRT), time to RRT, and other important outcomes exist in patients with ESRD or patients on RRT admitted on the weekend versus weekdays. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the 2018 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients were included if they were adults with a principal or secondary diagnosis of ESRD or if they were admitted with a diagnosis related to initiation, maintenance, or complications of RRT. Patients admitted between midnight Friday and midnight Sunday were classified as weekend admissions. Primary outcome measurements included in-hospital mortality, in-hospital dialysis (peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis, and continuous RRT), and renal transplantation (TP). Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay (LOS) and total hospitalization charges. RESULTS: The study included 1,144,385 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria. Compared with patients admitted on weekdays, patients with ESRD admitted on weekends had 8% higher adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.03-1.13; p = 0.002), 9% lower adjusted OR of any RRT over the weekend than on weekdays (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.89-0.93; p = 0.000), lower RRT rates (within 24 hours) (adjusted OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.70-0.73; p = 0.000), higher odds of renal TP (adjusted OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.20-1.45; p = 0.000), and higher hospitalization charges (mean adjusted increase: $1451; p = 0.07). LIMITATIONS: The limitations of the study include the use of retrospective data and an administrative database. CONCLUSION: Compared with weekday admissions, patients with ESRD admitted on weekends had higher odds of mortality, higher mean hospitalization charges, and higher odds of renal TP. They had lower overall RRT rates, and a longer time to first RRT. However, the average LOS was similar for both weekend and weekday admissions.