Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nutr Rev ; 78(1): 65-76, 2020 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31407778

ABSTRACT

Although chemotherapy succeeds in reducing tumor burden, the efficacy is limited due to acquired drug resistance and often irreparable side effects. Studies show that antioxidants may influence the response to chemotherapy and its side effects, although their use remains controversial. The evidence shows that some chemo-drugs induce oxidative stress and lead to normal tissue apoptosis and the entry of cancer cells to a dormant G0 state. Through the suppression of oxidative stress, antioxidants could protect normal cells and bring the tumor out of dormancy so as to expose it to chemotherapies. This review is focused on the redox biology of cancer/normal cells and association of reactive oxygen species with drug resistance, cancer dormancy, and side effects. To this end, evidence from cellular, animal, and clinical studies is provided to better understand the conundrum of dietary antioxidants in cancer chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Diet , Neoplasms/metabolism , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Primary Prevention , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism
2.
Biochem Mol Biol Educ ; 44(4): 349-60, 2016 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26898954

ABSTRACT

Metadiscourse markers (MDMs) are lexical resources that writers employ to organize their discourse and state their stance towards the content or the reader. This study investigated the frequency with which interactive and interactional MDMs were employed in biological research articles (RAs). It also explored the possible relationship between the frequency of these markers and Impact Factor (IF) of journals as an index of quality. Moreover, it aimed at finding out the difference(s) between two groups of authors (Iranian and American) in their use of these markers. Forty biological RAs published in years 2008-2011 written by Iranian non-native authors and published in four ISI journals with different IFs and 40 articles with the same characteristics published by American native authors were selected and examined for the use of the markers. The results showed that there was a strong positive correlation between the frequency of MDMs and IF of the journals. Regarding the frequency of MDMs, it was observed that Iranian authors employed interactive and interactional markers slightly more than their American counterparts. These results may provisionally confirm the considerable role of MDMs in enhancing the coherence and organization of articles for possible publication in high-impact journals. © 2016 by The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 44(4):349-360, 2016.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/standards , Information Dissemination , Journal Impact Factor , Periodicals as Topic/standards , Writing , Humans , Iran , United States
3.
Bioimpacts ; 4(4): 171-4, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25671172

ABSTRACT

The experience of work in BioImpacts and direct involvement in whole the process of publication inspired us to tackle here the dimensions which we recognize as problematic areas in publication, namely, scientific setbacks, language and technical issues. Authors besides readers as competent future authors are urged not to neglect the significance of well-writing either through considering the language-associated issues or attending the technical matters besides enriching the scientific content. The article offers a scope for the authors to manifest themselves, hence we suggest how to best appear in this play.

4.
Bioimpacts ; 2(1): 61-8, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23678443

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: journal selection for publication purposes is one of the concerns of biomedi-cal researchers. They apply various criteria for choosing appropriate journal. Here, we have tried to collect main criteria biomedical researchers use to select a journal to submit their works. METHODS: we collected these criteria through focus group conversations with researchers during our careers, feedbacks from participants of our scientific writing work-shops and non-systematic review of some related literature. RESULTS: we have presented a summative and informative guidance in the selection of journals for biomedical paper submission and publication. CONCLUSION: Categorized criteria as a mnemonic tool for au-thors may help the authors in journal selection process.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...