Pathologic complete response and survival in HER2-low and HER2-zero early breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancers without HER2 amplification but still expressing this membrane protein constitute a new entity called HER2-low tumors. It is important to characterize them in terms of sensitivity to treatment and prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To investigate chemosensitivity and long-term prognosis of HER2-low early breast cancer (eBC), compared to HER2-0 tumors, we retrospectively retrieved clinicopathological characteristics, response to treatment, and survival data from 511 patients treated for eBC with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in a French cancer center between 2007 and 2018. Factors associated with the achievement of pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival were studied among hormone receptor positive (HR+) and negative (HR-) eBC. RESULTS: A total of 280 HR+ (61% HER2-low), and 231 HR- (28% HER2-low) eBC were included. We found classical clinicopathological factors usually associated with chemosensitivity and prognosis, in both HR+ and HR- eBC. By uni- and multivariable analysis, HER2 status (low vs 0) was not independently associated with pCR, either in HR+ or HR- eBC. Relapse free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between HER2-low and HER2-0 among HR+ tumors. In contrast, among HR- negative tumors, RFS and OS were slightly better in HER2-0 eBC by univariable but not by multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In eBC patients treated with NAC, taking into account HR expression subtype and other current clinicopathological features, HER2-low tumors did not appear to have different chemosensitivity or prognosis, compared to their HER2-0 counterparts.

Pathologic and immunohistochemical prognostic markers in residual triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Background: The persistence of residual tumour after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in localised triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is known to have a negative prognostic value. However, different degrees of expression of some immunohistochemical markers may correlate with different prognoses. Methods: The expression of biomarkers with a known prognostic value, i.e., cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), androgen receptor (AR), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) proliferation-related nuclear antigen Ki-67, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), protein 53 (p53), forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3), and cluster differentiation 8 (CD8), was analysed by immunohistochemistry in 111 samples after NAC in non-metastatic TNBC patients addressed to Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Centre Dijon, France. Clinical and pathological variables were retrospectively collected. Cox regression was used to identify immunohistochemical (IHC) and clinicopathological predictors of event-free survival (EFS) (relapse or death). Results: Median age was 50.4 years (range 25.6-88.3), 55.9% (n = 62) were non-menopausal, 70 (63.1%) had stage IIA-IIB disease. NAC was mostly sequential anthracycline-taxanes (72.1%), and surgical intervention was principally conservative (51.3%). We found 65.7% ypT1, 47.2% lymph node involvement (ypN+), and 29.4% lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Most residual tumours were EGFR >110 (H-score) (60.5%, n = 66), AR ≥4% (53.2%, n = 58), p53-positive mutated (52.7%, n = 58), CD8 ≥26 (58.1%, n = 61), FOXP3 ≥7 (51.4%, n = 54), more than half in the stroma, and 52.3% (n = 58) HER2 score 0. After a median follow-up of 80.8 months, 48.6% had relapsed. Median EFS was 62.3 months (95% CI, 37.2-not reached (NR)). Factors independently associated with poor EFS were AR-low (p = 0.002), ypN+ (p < 0.001), and LVI (p = 0.001). Factors associated with lower overall survival (OS) were EGFR-low (p = 0.041), Ki-67 high (p = 0.024), and ypN+ (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Post-NAC residual disease in TNBC showed biomarkers specific to a basal-like subtype and markers of lymphocyte infiltration mostly present in the stroma. Prognostic markers for EFS were AR, LVI, and ypN and warrant further validation in a prognostic model.

Efficacy of Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiform: A Real-life Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Bevacizumab and chemotherapy are used in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) relapse. However, the choice of chemotherapeutic agent remains an open question and this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different combinations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2005 and August 2020, all patients treated with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (BVZ) for recurrent glioblastoma in the Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France were included in this retrospective comparative study. The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS) and as secondary objectives, overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were investigated. Factors associated with response were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were screened: 100 received fotemustine plus BVZ (62%) and 62 (38%) received another cytotoxic agent plus BVZ: 35 (22%) irinotecan (IRI), 18 (11%) temozolomide (TEM), and 7 (4%) lomustine (LOM). In the whole population, median PFS was 4.47 months, median OS was 9 months, and 3-month DCR was 51%. Regarding survival according to treatment, median OS was significantly lower in the fotemustine group compared to that in other cytotoxic agents: 7.3 vs. 19.9 months. In the fotemustine group, steroids use at baseline and low Karnofsky performance status were associated with poor median OS. Grade 3-4 adverse events were found in 21.9%, with no difference between groups, but 7 patients had grade 5 adverse events in the fotemustine group. CONCLUSION: Using real-life data, this study showed lower efficacy of fotemustine and bevacizumab, as compared to IRI or TEM or LOM-BVZ combinations.

Pathologic Response After Weekly Paclitaxel versus Docetaxel in Operable Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Weekly paclitaxel (Ptx) and q3w docetaxel (Dtx) are equivalent in adjuvant breast cancer treatment. Weekly Ptx is better tolerated than q3w Dtx and became the first choice in daily practice, even preoperatively. METHODS: To compare the efficacy and safety of the two regimens, a retrospective analysis was performed in breast cancer patients (pts) referred for neoadjuvant, sequential, taxane-containing chemotherapy to the Institute of Oncology and Oncofort Clinic, Bucharest, between 2008 and 2017. RESULTS: Forty-seven cases were eligible, median age was 56 years (34-73 years), mainly stage IIIA-B (53.2%, 25 pts) and ductal invasive (70.2%, 33 pts) of which 24 pts (51%) received q3w Dtx and 23 pts (48.9%) weekly Ptx. The histological response rates were 62.5% (15 pts) and 73.7% (17 pts) (p=0.47), average dose-intensity was 87.7% and 96.7% (p=0.002) and grade III-IV toxicity rate was 12.5% and 13% (p=0.64), respectively. Pathologic response was correlated with immunophenotype, PgR expression, tumor size and backbone chemotherapy (p<0.05). DISCUSSION: Our study showed an improved efficacy of taxane's weekly administration, probably due to a better tolerance and a lower rate of dose-impairing toxicities.

Potential clinically useful prognostic biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer: preliminary results of a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a poor prognosis, even in its early stages. In the absence of postoperative targeted treatments, intensive adjuvant chemotherapy regimens are proposed. For those favorable histologies, such as apocrine and adenoid cystic carcinoma, which frequently belong to TNBC, aggressive treatments are unnecessary. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 631 cases of breast cancer, primary operated curatively, and followed up at our institution for at least 36 months to identify the bio-markers assessable by immunohistochemistry, to be proposed as prognostic score for tailoring adjuvant treatment to TNBC patients. RESULTS: The triple-negative phenotype was found in 85 patients (13.5%). Over a mean followup of 55.7 months, relapses occurred in 106 patients (16.8%), of which 18 (2.8%) were TNBC. Recurrence was directly correlated with Ki67 and cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6) immunoreactivity in all breast cancer patients (P=0.005), but only marginally with CK5/6 and epithelial cadherin (E-cad) expression in TNBC patients (P=0.07). Mean event-free survival (EFS) in TNBC patients was 85.52 months compared with 100.4 months in non-TNBC patients (P=0.228). The EFS of CK5/6-negative triple-negative patients was 68.84 months compared with 98.84 months in those who were CK5/6 positive (HR =5.08; P=0.038). EFS differed among patients identified as double-positive for E-cad and CK5/6 (83.87 months), those expressing E-cad or CK5/6 (64.23 months), and those negative for both biomarkers (39.64 months). CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that CK5/6 and E-cad are possible core biomarkers for a cost-effective prognostic evaluation of primary operable TNBC patients.