ABSTRACT
Here, we describe a scalable and automated, high-content microscopy -based mini-immunofluorescence assay (mini-IFA) for serological testing i.e., detection of antibodies. Unlike conventional IFA, which often relies on the use of cells infected with the target pathogen, our assay employs transfected cells expressing individual viral antigens. The assay builds on a custom neural network-based image analysis pipeline for the automated and multiplexed detection of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM) in patient samples. As a proof-of-concept, we employed high-throughput equipment to set up the assay for measuring antibody response against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection with spike (S), membrane (M), and nucleo (N) proteins, and the receptor-binding domain (R) as the antigens. We compared the automated mini-IFA results from hundreds of patient samples to the visual observations of human experts and to the results obtained with conventional ELISA. The comparisons demonstrated a high correlation to both, suggesting high sensitivity and specificity of the mini-IFA. By testing pre-pandemic samples and those collected from patients with RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, we found mini-IFA to be most suitable for IgG and IgA detection. The results demonstrated N and S proteins as the ideal antigens, and the use of these antigens can serve to distinguish between vaccinated and infected individuals. The assay principle described enables detection of antibodies against practically any pathogen, and none of the assay steps require high biosafety level environment. The simultaneous detection of multiple Ig classes allows for distinguishing between recent and past infection. Public abstractThe manuscript describes a miniaturized immunofluorescence assay (mini-IFA) for measuring antibody response in patient blood samples. The automated method builds on machine-learning -guided image analysis with SARS-CoV-2 as the model pathogen. The method enables simultaneous measurement of IgM, IgA, and IgG responses against different virus antigens in a high throughput manner. The assay relies on antigens expressed through transfection and allows for differentiation between vaccine-induced and infection-induced antibody responses. The transfection-based antigen expression enables performing the assay at a low biosafety level laboratory and allows fast adaptation of the assay to emerging pathogens. Our results provide proof-of-concept for the approach, demonstrating fast and accurate measurement of antibody responses in a clinical and research set-up.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundPrevious SARS-CoV-2 infection primes the immune system and thus individuals who recovered from infection have enhanced immune responses to subsequent vaccination (hybrid immunity). However, it remains unclear how well hybrid immunity induced by severe or mild infection can cross-neutralize emerging variants. We aimed to compare the strength and breadth of antibody responses in vaccinated recovered and uninfected subjects. MethodsWe measured spike-specific IgG and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) from vaccinated subjects including 320 with hybrid immunity and 20 without previous infection. From 29 subjects with a previous severe or mild infection, we also measured NAb responses against Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529/BA.1) variants following vaccination. ResultsA single vaccine dose induced 2-fold higher anti-spike IgG concentrations and 3-fold higher neutralizing potency of antibodies in previously infected compared to uninfected fully vaccinated subjects. We found similar IgG concentrations in previously infected subjects after one or two vaccine doses. NAb titers were higher in subjects with severe compared to those with mild infection. This difference remained after vaccination with sequentially decreasing titers against Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants. ConclusionsHybrid immunity induced strong IgG responses, particularly after severe infection. However, the NAb titers were low against heterologous variants, especially against Omicron.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundValidation and standardization of accurate serological assays are crucial for the surveillance of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and population immunity. MethodsWe describe the analytical and clinical performance of an in-house fluorescent multiplex immunoassay (FMIA) for simultaneous quantification of antibodies against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleoprotein and spike glycoprotein. Furthermore, we calibrated IgG-FMIA against World Health Organisation (WHO) International Standard and compared FMIA results to an in-house enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and a microneutralisation test (MNT). We also compared the MNT results of two laboratories. ResultsIgG-FMIA displayed 100% specificity and sensitivity for samples collected 13-150 days post-onset of symptoms (DPO). For IgA- and IgM-FMIA 100% specificity and sensitivity were obtained for a shorter time window (13-36 and 13-28 DPO for IgA- and IgM-FMIA, respectively). FMIA and EIA results displayed moderate to strong correlation, but FMIA was overall more specific and sensitive. IgG-FMIA identified 100% of samples with neutralising antibodies (NAbs). Anti-spike IgG concentrations correlated strongly ({rho}=0.77-0.84, P<2.2x10-16) with NAb titers. The NAb titers of the two laboratories displayed a very strong correlation ({rho}=0.95, P<2.2x10-16). DiscussionOur results indicate good correlation and concordance of antibody concentrations measured with different types of in-house SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays. Calibration against WHO international standard did not, however, improve the comparability of FMIA and EIA results.
