[Celiac artery compression syndrome--stepchild of abdominal angina?]. / A truncus coeliacus kompressziós szindróma--a hasi angina "mostohagyermeke"?

BACKGROUND: Celiac trunk compression in few percentages of the cases can cause chronic abdominal pain that shows no connection with eating. CASE REPORT: Detailed preoperative examinations showed significant, segmental stenosis of the celiac trunk, caused by outer compression of a tendonous arc of diaphragm, in the background of abdominal pain and mesenteric ischemia of a 58-year-old woman. After preparation we have executed the surgery by removing a tight ring, located at around 8-10 mm from the origin of trifurcation, and a part of the celiac ganglion. The patient was dismissed from our hospital 6 days after surgery in good general condition. DISCUSSION: The abdominal pain can normally be the consequence of mesenteric ischemia. The root cause in most of the cases is the alteration of the particular artery. The outer compression is normally responsible only for a few percentages of the cases. In our case the problem was caused by a stronger tendonous part of the aortic hiatus. The first sign of this during the examination was a recognisable noise over the artery, which was caused by the poststenotic turbulent flow. Detailed radiological examinations executed based on this indeed proved this malfunction. CONCLUSION: In case of unidentified abdominal pain we have to consider the possibility of the stenosis of the celiac trunk. By our case study we would like to call the attention to the importance of the auscultation over the abdomen, which is a relevant part of the basic physical examinations. When getting to the final diagnosis, apart from the duplex doppler sonography, we also used the results of angiography. The essence of the surgery was to get rid of the outer compression of the artery, which has to be done as soon as possible in order to avoid that compression causes degeneration of the artery itself.

[Late metastases of abdominal cutaneous malignant melanoma in the small and large bowels]. / Hasfali melanoma malignum késoi multiplex vékony- es vastagbél-metasztázisa.

The authors reported the case of a 56 years old man, who was operated with abdominal cutaneous malignant melanoma 5 years ago. He had chemo-immunotherapy. His complaints were epigastric pain, melena, hematochezia, anorexia, lack of appetite, fatigue. The upper panendoscopy showed tumor mass in the duodenojejunal flexure and the colonoscopy showed tumor in the large bowel. The patient underwent jejunal resection and right hemicolectomy. The authors survey the metastases of malignant melanoma as well as their clinical signs, therapeutic measures and prognosis.

[Late metastases of cutaneous malignant melanoma on the abdominal wall to the small and large bowel]. / Hasfali melanoma malignum késoi multiplex vékony-es vastagbél metasztázisa.

We describe the case of a 56 years old man, who was operated on with abdominal wall skin malignant melanoma 5 years ago. He received postoperative DTIC + Intron A treatment. Five years later he presented with complaints of epigastric pain, melena, hematochezia, anorexia and fatigue. Upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy showed a tumour mass in the duodeno-jejunal flexure and colonoscopy showed a tumour in the large bowel. Histology verified anaplastic carcinoma. The patient was operated on. We found metastases in the small and the large bowel The patient underwent resection of the jejunum and right hemicolectomy. We describe the different types of metastases of malignant melanomas symptoms, therapies and prognosis.

[Dilemmas arising from surgical treatment of epiphrenic diverticulum]. / Az epiphrenalis nyelocso-diverticulum sebészi kezelésének dilemmái.

INTRODUCTION: Epiphrenic diverticulum cannot be considered a primary anatomical alteration, there is a manometrically verifiable motility disturbance in the background. OBJECTIVES: To determine the place, type and time of surgical solution in the treatment. PATIENTS: Between 1999 and 2004 seven patients were treated for epiphrenic diverticulum causing complaints. Average age was 61 years, and the leading symptom was dysphagia and regurgitation. Motility abnormalities characteristic of achalasia in four cases, hypertensive LES in three cases, and incompetent and normal LES, and diffuse esophageal spasm in one patient each could be revealed. The size of diverticuli varied between 5-9 cm. RESULTS: In four cases transthoracic diverticulectomy myotomy and partial antireflux plasty, in two cases esophagus resection, and in the case of one patient myotomy and fundoplication was performed. In the removed diverticuli an ulcer and a malignant transformation in one case each was detected. No major complications could be observed. Six patients are completely satisfied with the operation, only one reported well tolerable occasional regurgitations. CONCLUSION: Even in the era of minimal invasive surgery the traditionally performed, combined - diverticulectomy, myotomy, fundoplication - operative solution should be considered the gold standard. Surgical intervention is justified even for accidentally discovered symptomless patients, due to the considerable potential complications of the disease.