Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 27(9): 5509-5518, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37505241

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between obesity and periodontitis staging compared with periodontal healthy or gingivitis in pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on pregnant women between 11 and 14 weeks of pregnancy. Sociodemographic, clinical, obstetric, and periodontal variables were studied. The exposure variable was obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30), and the primary outcome was periodontitis staging versus periodontal healthy/gingivitis. Data were analysed and estimated by multinomial logistic regression models. RESULTS: The present study screened 1086 pregnancies and analysed 972 women with a median age of 29 years; 36.8% were diagnosed as obese. 26.9% of patients were diagnosed as periodontal healthy or gingivitis, 5.5% with stage I periodontitis, 38.6% with stage II periodontitis, 24% with stage III periodontitis, and 5.1% with stage IV periodontitis. After identifying and adjusting for confounding variables (educational level and plaque index), obesity had a relative risk ratio (RRR) of 1.66 (95% CI: 1.05-2.64; p = 0.03) and 1.57 (95% CI: 1.09-2.27; p = 0.015) for stage III periodontitis compared to periodontal healthy/gingivitis and stage II periodontitis, respectively. CONCLUSION: Besides the already known risk indicators for periodontitis (age, smoking, and educational level), our study suggests a relationship between obesity and periodontitis staging in pregnancy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Obesity can alter host immune responses, leading to increased susceptibility to infections and overactive host immunity, which could influence the prevalence and severity of maternal periodontitis in pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Gingivitis , Periodontitis , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Periodontitis/complications , Periodontitis/epidemiology , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Gingivitis/epidemiology
2.
Prenat Diagn ; 41(8): 1018-1035, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34191294

ABSTRACT

There are over 50 SARS-CoV-2 candidate vaccines undergoing Phase II and III clinical trials. Several vaccines have been approved by regulatory authorities and rolled out for use in different countries. Due to concerns of potential teratogenicity or adverse effect on maternal physiology, pregnancy has been a specific exclusion criterion for most vaccine trials with only two trials not excluding pregnant women. Thus, other than limited animal studies, gradually emerging development and reproductive toxicity data, and observational data from vaccine registries, there is a paucity of reliable information to guide recommendations for the safe vaccination of pregnant women. Pregnancy is a risk factor for severe COVID-19, especially in women with comorbidities, resulting in increased rates of preterm birth and maternal morbidity. We discuss the major SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, their mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety profile and possible benefits to the maternal-fetal dyad to create a rational approach towards maternal vaccination while anticipating and mitigating vaccine-related complications. Pregnant women with high exposure risks or co-morbidities predisposing to severe COVID-19 infection should be prioritised for vaccination. Those with risk factors for adverse effects should be counselled accordingly. It is essential to support patient autonomy by shared decision-making involving a risk-benefit discussion with the pregnant woman.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/immunology , Vaccination/ethics
3.
Prenat Diagn ; 36(5): 476-82, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26988336

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to explore the feasibility of measuring endothelial and placental biomarkers in saliva and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and to determine if patients with preeclampsia (PE) have a different profile of these biomarkers in oral fluids. METHOD: A case-control study was conducted, including patients with PE (n = 10) and a control group with normal pregnancies randomly selected (n = 20) admitted at the Sótero del Río Hospital in Santiago, Chile. A complete periodontal and obstetric history that involved the collection of oral fluids was performed at the same gestational age. Levels of Cd63(+) extracellular vesicles, placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP), placental growth factor (PlGF), and sFlt-1 levels were determined by ELISA assays. Data analysis was performed with chi-square or Fisher's exact test, and Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables. The association was assessed using a multiple logistic regression model. RESULTS: sFlt-1 concentrations in saliva and GCF were significantly higher in patients with PE (p = 0.045 and p = 0.033 respectively). Concentrations of PLAP were elevated in GCF of patients with PE (p = 0.049). The PLAP/CD63(+) ratio in GCF of patients with PE was significantly higher (p = 0.0008). No differences in PlGF levels were observed. CONCLUSION(S): GCF of patients with PE concentrates higher levels of biomarkers related with the PE development. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Subject(s)
Alkaline Phosphatase/metabolism , Extracellular Vesicles/metabolism , Isoenzymes/metabolism , Placenta Growth Factor/metabolism , Pre-Eclampsia/metabolism , Saliva/chemistry , Tetraspanin 30/metabolism , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/metabolism , Body Fluids/chemistry , Case-Control Studies , Chile , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , GPI-Linked Proteins/metabolism , Gingiva , Humans , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Pregnancy , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL