Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 114(1-3): 39-44, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15933079

ABSTRACT

A mobile measurement facility which complies with IEC 62220-1 has been set up to determine the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray detector systems. Exemplary measurements were performed for two similar CR detector systems, a CsI-based indirect detector and an Se-based direct detector. The standardised radiation quality RQA 5 was applied for measurement and for three of these systems RQA 9 was also applied. A pronounced dependence of DQE on radiation quality was observed for the direct detector, where the DQEs for RQA 5 and RQA 9 differ by a factor of approximately 2. The uncertainty (95% confidence interval) associated with the measured DQE values is within 0.01 and 0.04 depending on, for example, the spatial frequency. Thus, it has been demonstrated that the DQE can be measured accurately and reliably with the accuracy required by the international standard IEC 62220-1. It is now possible to objectively measure and compare DQE values of digital X-ray detector systems.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Calibration , Cesium/chemistry , Diagnostic Imaging/instrumentation , Diagnostic Imaging/standards , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Humans , Iodides/chemistry , Models, Theoretical , Radiographic Image Enhancement/instrumentation , Radiometry , Selenium/chemistry , Software , X-Ray Intensifying Screens , X-Rays
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 114(1-3): 75-80, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15933084

ABSTRACT

Former studies by Hoeschen and Buhr indicated a higher total noise in a thorax image than expected from technical noise, i.e. quantum and detector noise. This difference results from the overlay of many small anatomical structures along the X-ray beam, which leads to a noise-like appearance without distinguishable structures in the projected image. A method is proposed to quantitatively determine this 'anatomical noise' component, which is not to be confused with the anatomical background (e.g. ribs). This specific anatomical noise pattern in a radiograph changes completely when the imaging geometry changes because different small anatomical structures contribute to the projected image. Therefore, two images are taken using slightly different exposure geometry, and a correlation analysis based on wavelet transforms allows to determining the uncorrelated noise components. Since the technical noise also differs from image to image, which makes it difficult to separate the anatomical noise, images of a lung phantom were produced on a low-sensitive industrial X-ray film using high-exposure levels. From these results, the anatomical noise level in real clinical thorax radiographs using realistic exposure levels is predicted using the general dose dependence described in the paper text and compared with the quantum and detector noise level of an indirect flat-panel detector system. For consistency testing, the same lung phantom was imaged with the same digital flat-panel detector and the total image noise including anatomical noise is determined. The results show that the relative portion of anatomical noise may exceed the technical noise level. Anatomical noise is an important contributor to the total image noise and, therefore, impedes the recognition of anatomical structures.


Subject(s)
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Artifacts , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Models, Theoretical , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , X-Ray Intensifying Screens , X-Rays
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 114(1-3): 214-9, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15933111

ABSTRACT

A variant of the edge method for the determination of the pre-sampled modulation transfer function (MTF) of digital X-ray imaging devices has been developed and accepted as the standard method in the novel DQE measurement standard IEC 62220-1. An opaque tungsten edge-test device accomplishes the ideal step-like profile of the incident X rays. The edge spread function is measured over a large region across the edge transition that enables an accurate MTF measurement including the 'low-frequency drop'. The method has been applied to different state-of-the-art X-ray imaging detectors, a computed radiography, a CsI-based indirect and an Se-based direct flat-panel detector. The MTF measurement results will be presented. In contrast to the opaque edge device, the commonly used semi-transparent edge-test devices produce scatter radiation that deteriorates the incident X-ray profile, which leads to a systematic overestimation of the MTF.


Subject(s)
Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , X-Rays , Cesium/chemistry , Equipment Design , Humans , Iodides/chemistry , Reproducibility of Results , Selenium/chemistry , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tungsten , X-Ray Intensifying Screens
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...